Order Received for Signature

Cal. Super. - 5th Dist.May 3, 2021

E-FILED 9/15/2021 2:26 PM Superior Court of California County of Fresno By: L Peterson, Deputy CITY ATTORNEY CITY HALL FRESNO. CA 9372l \DOONONUIADJNfl NNNNNNNNNHHHt-IHt-Ip-np-Au-H WVQMhWNHOOWNQm-PWNHO DOUGLAS T. SLOAN, City Attorney CITY OF FRESNO By: Brian M. Velez, Deputy City Attorney (#330940) 2600 Fresno Street, Room 2031 Fresno, California 93 721-3 602 Telephone: (559) 621-7500 Facsimile: (559) 457-1084 Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Cornplainant, CITY 0F FRESNO Exempt From Filing Fees Pursuant T0 Government Code Section 6103 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE 0F CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO GIANNA PROVENZANO, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF FRESNO, GUIDO VENTRESCA LIVING TRUST; JOHN VENTRESCA; and DOES 1-30 Inclusive, Defendants. CITY OF FRESNO, Cross-Complainant VS. JOHN G. VENTRESCA, Trustee ofJohn G. Ventresca and Lucianna Ventresca Declaration 0f the Trust, LUCIANNA VENTRESCA as Trustee 0f the John G. Ventresca and Lucianna Ventresca Declaration 0f the Trust, ROES 1 through 10, Cross-Defendants VVVVVUUUUVVVVVVUVV VUWVVUVVVVVVVVVV Case No.2 21CECG01263 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF FRESNO LEAVE TO FILE CROSS- COMPLAINT DATE: 11/10/21 TIME: 3:30 p.m. DEPT: 502 Action Filed: 05/03/2021 First Amended Filed: 07/07/2021 Trial Date: 03/27/2023 Gianna Provenzano v City of Fresno Case No.: 2 lCECG01263 [Proposed] Order Granting Motion for Leave t0 File Cross-Complaint CITY ATTORNEY CITY HALL FRESNO. CA 93721 \OOOQQUIAL'JNH NNNNNNNNN-t---_t-np-t-t-‘p-‘ WQQMANNHO©WQOM¥WNHO Having read the motion, the memoranda and declarations filed by the parties, and having heard argument of counsel, the Court finds that the cross-complaint arises out ofthe same transaction 0r occurrence as that alleged in the first amended complaint and finds good cause that defendant’s failure t0 file a cross-complaint with the answer was excusable and in good faith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant City 0f Fresno’s Motion for Leave to File Cross- Complaint is hereby granted DATED: Honorable Judge of the Superior Court PL 196277 Gianna Provenzano v City of Fresno Case No.: 21CECG01263 [Proposed] Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint PROOF 0F SERVICE CCP §§ 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5 2 FRCP 5(b) 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO I am employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. I am over the age 0f 18 and 4 not a party t0 the within action; my business address is 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721 - 3602. 5’ 5 On September /_, 2021, I served the document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CITY OF FRESNO LEAVE T0 FILE CROSS-COMPLAINT on the 6 interested parties in this action identified as follows: 7 Jesse Fretwell Kevin Pickut Law Office of Darryl B. Freedman, Inc. HEAT Attorney 8 3705 W. Beechwood Avenue STRATMAN, SCHWARTZ & WlLLlAMS-ABREGO Fresno, CA 9371 1 Central Valley Branch Legal Office, Fresno ~ 9 Email: eservicg@freedmanlaw.com; Sacramento 10 JesseF@FreedmanLaw.com; Farmers Insurance Exchange AdrienneA@FreedmanLaw.com Mailing Address: P.O. Box 258829, Oklahoma City, 11 Office: (559) 447-9000 OK 73 125-8829 FAX N0: (559) 447-9100 Direct Dial: (559) 433-2522 12 (Attorney for Plaintiff) E:Mail: kevin.piekutéflfarmersinsurauce.com 1 3 (Attorney for Defendants John G. Ventresca & Lucianna as Trustee of the John G. Ventresca and Lucianna 14 Ventresca Trust) I By: D transmitting the original in a sealed envelope, I transmitting a true copy thereof in a 15 sealed envelope, I transmitting a true copy thereof: l BY MAIL D I deposited an envelope containing the above-referenced document in the mail 16 at Fresno, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully 17 prepaid. I As follows: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice 0f collection and 18 processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited 19 with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Fresno, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of 20 the patty served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date 0r postage meter date is more than onc day after date 0f deposit for mailing in affidavit. 21 D (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused an envelope containing 0f the above-referenced 22 document to be hand delivered. D (BY FAX) I caused the above-referenced document to be transmitted by fax to the 23 addressee(s) at the fax number(s) shown. U (BY OVERNIGHT COURIER) I caused the envelope(s) containing the above-referenced 24 document to be delivered to an overnight courier service for delivery to the addressee(s). 25 I (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) I caused the above-referenced document to be transmitted by electronic mail (e-mail) to the addressee(s) at the e-mai1(s) shown. 26 Executed 0n September , 2021, at Fresno, California. I (State) I declare under penalty 0f perjury under the laws 0f the State 0f galifornia that the 27 above is true and correct. 28 CITY ATTORNEY Gianna Provenzano v City of Fresno ‘ 9”" *{AU' Case No.2 21CECGo 1263mmNo. LA 9372i . . . . [Proposed] Order Grantmg Motion for Leave t0 FIIe Cross-Complamt