Statement Case Management ConferenceCal. Super. - 6th Dist.May 8, 2018CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): Kathryn C. Klaus, Esq. 2059231 Douglas E. Johns, Esq. 314798 Coddington, Hicks & Danforth 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94065 TELEPHONE NO.: (65 0 ) 5 92 - 5 4 0 0 FAX NO.(Optional) .· (650) 5 92 - 5 0 2 7 FOR COURT USE ONL Y I E-MAILADDRESS(Optionaij:kklaus@chdlawyers.com/djohns@chdlawyers.com I ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant Irenne Soto Zwierlein I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLAEA I STREET !\DDRESS: 191 North First Stre et MAILING ADDRESS: San Jose, California 95113 CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gary Paul Dixon DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Irenne Soto Zwierlein, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Check one): !XI UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded exceeds $25,000) (Amount demanded is $25,000 or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 8/21/ 18 Time: 2:15 p.m. Dept.: 13 Address of court (if different from the address above): CASE NUMBER: 18CV327896 Div.: !XI Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Douglas E. Johns Room: INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Part'l or parties (answer one): a. !XI This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant Irenne Soto Zwierlein b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The compiaint was filed on (date) : b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared , or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify namesj: (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which they may be served) : 4. Description of case a. Type of case in IXl complaint 0 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): This personal injury action arises out of a motor vehicle accident that happened on June 14, 2016. Negligence is the only cause of action. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] erne , ~. tiai ab.com Q]Forms CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720-3.730 www.courts.ca.gov Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, on 8/6/2018 2:50 PM Reviewed By: R. Tien Case #18CV327896 Envelope: 1803829 18CV327896 Santa Clara - Civil R. Tien CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETIT!ONER:Gary Paul Dixon CASE NUMBER - 18CV327896 oEFENoANTIRESPONoEN~Irenne Soto Zwierlein, et al. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount), estimated future medical expenses, lost eamings to date, and estimated future lost eamings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Plaintiff alleges injuries and damages that arise out of a motor vehicle accident that happened on June 14, 2016. o (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. .Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request W a jury trial D a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6. Trial date a. D The trial has been set for (date): b. [XI No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the compiaint (if not, explain): c. Oates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. IX) days (specify number): 5 - 7 b. D hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial [XI by the attorney or party listed in the caption D by the following: Q. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: D Additional representation is desciibed in Attachment 8. 9. Preference o This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different AoR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel IX) has D has not provided the AoR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed AoR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party D has D has not reviewed the AoR information package identified in rule 3.221 . b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) D This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under of Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) D Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .11. (3) D This case is exempt from judiciai arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] rrn", ~~ .iS~nt~m ~m roforma- CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 5 CM-110 PLA!NTIFF/PETITIONER:Gary Paul Dixon CASE NUMBER: - 18CV327896 DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT:lrenne Sat a Zwierlein, et al. 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check aI/ that apply and provide the specified information): I (i) Mediation (2) Settlement conference (3) Neutral evaluation (4) Nonbinding judicia! arbitration (5) Binding private arbitration I I (6) Other (specify): CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CEBel Essential a!b.com 0 Fr,nms' ! The party or parties completing I this form are willing to I participate in the following ADR processes (check all that apply): W D D - 0 D o If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to I participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, I indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties ' ADR stipulation) : W Mediation session not yet scheduled D Mediation session scheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete mediation by (date): D Mediation completed on (date): W Settlement conference not yet scheduled D Settlement conference scheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): D Settlement conference completed on (date): D Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled D Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): D Neutral evaluation completed on (date): o Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled I o Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): D Judicial arbitration completed on (date): '.-~-' .. - D Private arbitration not yet scheduled ! o Private arbitration scheduled for (date): I D Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): I D Private arbitration completed on (date): D ADR session not y et scheduled D ADR session scheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): D ADR completed on (date): CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of 5 I I CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER Gary Paul Dixon CASE NUMBER: 18CV327896 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Irenne Soto Zwierlein, et al. 11. Insurance a. D Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): CSAA Insurance Exchange b. Reservation of rights: D Yes (Xl No c. 0 Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (exp/ainj: 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describe the status. D Bankruptcy 0 Other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. D There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: D Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. D A motion to 0 consolidate D coordinate 14. Bifurcation will be filed by (name party): D The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions D The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): 16. Discovery a. D The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. W The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Defendant Written Discovery Defendant Depositions Defendant Expert Discovery Date February 2019 December 2018 Per Code c. D The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of 5 ern-I t;ss.. enti5l~ ceb.com m Forms CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Gary Paul Dixon CASE NUMBER: 18CV327896 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Irenne Soto Zwierlein, et al. 17. Economic litigation a. 0 This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic iitigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. 0 This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, 8xpiain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or iria; should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues D The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19. Meet and confer a. 0 The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference. including the written authority of the party where required. Date: August 6, 2018 D0l1g1as E CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011J C[B~ I E ential CC-o,COM ElF@f S' ,Iohns (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) ~ fI~4~NATUREOF~PA ~ATIORNEY)- ~ ------------------------------------------------ (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATIORNEY) o Additional signatures are attached. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 I CourtCalr COlJrtCa/i Appearance - Service Copy 6383 Arizona Circle Los Angeles. CA 90045 Phone: (888) 882 .. 6878 Fax: (888) 883-2946 Cou!"tCall.com Court Con¥omnce" is ~ dlvi3ion !y' CuurtCai!.b This document shall serve as notice of a CourtCall Appearance by the participant listed below in the referenced case. Others wishing to appear remotely should contact CourtCall, LLC at (888) 882-6878 or (310) 342-0888. Douglas E Johns Coddington, Hicks & Danforth Tel: (650) 592-5400 Fax: (650) 592-5027 Case Name: Dixon v. Zwierlein Case Number: 18CV327896 Court Name: Santa Clara County Superior Court (CA) Dept/Judge: 13 / Judge James L. Stoelker Proceeding: Case Management Conference Date/Time: Tuesday, August 21st, 2018 at 2:15 PM PT Note: this is not a Confirmation of your CourtCall Appearance. Each participant must make his or her own arrangements with CourtCali. While clients can save money and Courts can become more efficient and generate revenue, CourtCall has the most impact upon practicing attorneys as it helps to give them their lives back. Attorneys can use the time they save using CourtCall to catch-Up on other pressing matters, enjoy time with family and friends or otherwise take advantage of the time no longer spent traveling to and from Court. Call us for details. There are no subscriptions or equipment to buy. COURTCALL CourtCall is interested VIDEO equipping Judges IS HERE! Courtrooms of with its state-of-the-art, browser-based video conferencing platform, enabling full video participation for traditional CourtCal1 Appearances. Lawyers only need a computer with sufficient bandwidth and a webcam to view and/or share video in accordance with a Judge's preferences. To learn more about video options, please ask a Courteall representative, The foregoing information have been obtained from records which may not recent calendar changes. ,If may court reflect it is inaccurate because your appearance has been continued, please apply this information to the new date. If the matter is off calendar, you have no involvement in the case or you do not wish to use this service, please disregard this notice. Do not call the Court Clerk. Our representatives areavanable to make presentations for your firm, your clients, Bar Associations or other groups. Please call to schedule a presentation. Remote Appearances. Simplified. CourtCall Appearances are available for over 2,000 Judges monthly. Please visit our website at www.courtcall.com for a across the US, Canada and other jurisdictions. nationwide, compiete with additional Courts list of participating Courts being and added Judges NOTFD [P] SERVICE COPY FOR COURTCALL® APPEARANCE Copyright © 2018 CourtCall, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 1 2 '2 J PROOF OF SERVICE California Code of Civil Procedure sections 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5 California Rule of Court rule 2.251 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b) 4 I 1. the undersigned. declare that I am emoloved in the CountvJ of San Mateo, State of II - J ~ / 5 California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My 6 business address is 555 Twin DolprLin Drive, Suite 300, Redwood City, California 94065. My 7 electronic mail address is Eva@chdlawyers.com. 81 I am readily familiar with my employer's business practice for collection and processing 9 of correspondence and documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service, mailing via 10 overnight delivery, transmission by facsimile machine, and delivery by hand. 11 On August 6, 2018, I served a copy of each of the documents listed below by placing 12 said copies for processing as indicated herein. 13 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~~ I L:J 26 27 28 x COURTCALL APPEARANCE - SERVICE COpy United States Mail: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes with postage thereon fully prepaid on the above date placed for collection and mailing at my place of business to be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service at Redwood City, California on this same date in the ordinary course of business. Overnight Delivery: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled packaging for overnight de1ivery, with Federal Express, with all charges to be paid by my employer on the above date for collection at my place of business to be deposited in a facility regularly maintained by the overnight delivery carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by the overnight delivery carrier to receive such packages; on this date in the ordinary course of business. Hand Delivery: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes and served by personal delivery to the party or attorney indicated herein, or if upon attorney, by leaving the labeled envefopes with a receptionist or other person having charge of the attorney's office. Facsimile Transmission: The correspondence or documents were placed for transmission from (650) 592-5027 at Redwood City, California, and were transrritted to a facsimile machine maintained by the party or attorney to be served at the facsimile machine telephone number provided bv said party or attorney, on this same date in the ordinary course of business. The transmission was reported as complete and without error, and a record of the transmission was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. Electronic Transmission: The correspondence or documents were transnutted electronically to the electronic address set forth below. 1 2 3 4 II 5 t:.. v 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 II 23 I 24 25 26 27 28 State. The recipient has filed and served notice that he or she accepts electronic service; the recipient has electronically filed a document with the court; and/ or the Court has mandated that the parties serve documents through its Court approved vendor. The grinted form of this document bearing the original signature is on file and available .Lor inspection at the request of the court or any party to the action or proceeding in which it is flied, in the manner provided in California Rule of Court Rule 2.257 (a). Federal. The recipient of this electronic service has consented to t}ljs method of service in writing, a copy of which is on file and available for inspection in my ernployer's office. I have received no indication the electronic transmission did not reach the recipient. PERSONS OR PARTIES SERVED: Brent J. Griffith Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. 55 S. Market Street Suite 1010 San Jose, CA 95113 TeleJ?h