NoticeCal. Super. - 6th Dist.January 16, 2018OOQON \O 10 11 12 13 14 15 1-6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart© (ABA # 02803628 - c/o PO B0x 694 . A v San Jose, CA 95106 FEB 1 5 2018 Tele: (408) 217-4426 S flCéerk of the Court - - - - upe or ourt ofCA County o! Santa ClaraFor Petltloner/Plamtlff BY DEPUTY %K. Ross SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA - Civil Unlimited Division 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 HIRH Prince William Bullock, HI: Case No. 18-CV-321862 Stewart©’ the natural hvmg man’ Stewart /vs/ Barbadillo, et al Petitioner /vs/ . . . . . . Plalntlff/Petltloner HIRH PrmceGm D- Barb?dlll°’ SEN 261799’ William Bullock III Stewart©’s: (prlvate capamty); Notice 0f Notice 0f Removal 0f Case 18- CV-321862, t0 Neutral County (Alameda), as to all Parties and all Actions [Authority: Defendant Barbadillo, City 0f Milpitas City Councilman, C.C.P. § 394] Note: This removal does not include related Case N0. 17EA000128 [C.C.P. §§ 394, 397; Title 28 U.s_c. §§ 1441, 1443; Charluck v. Municipal Court, Civ. N0. 45837. Court of Appeals 0f California, Second Appellate District, Division Four. August 26, 1975.; Title 42 U.S.C. § 407(a); In re Hall, 442 B.R. 754, 762 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2010); FRCP Rule 12(b), Rule 12(1); Federal Constitution of 1787 4‘“, 5”“, 14‘“ Amendments; Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1347, 1446, 1446(a), 1446(d), 1447 (a); Magma Carta of 1215] Raj eev Kumar Madnawat, SBN 244855, (private capacity); Timothy A. Griswold, SBN 258001, (private capacity); Kenneth Cleon Brooks, SBN 167792, (private capacity); Defendants Federal Law states: The use nf fictitiuus names nr‘ addresses (ALL-EAPITAL-LEWERS) in a private individual's names ur a ZIP EDDE against the individual's wishes is a crime under Title 39 U.S.E. Sectiun 3003, Title IB 113.13. 1302, 1341, 1342, and is punishable by up to IE years imprisonment and $1,000,030.01] fine. WW Plaintiff’s Notice of Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Cise 18-CV-322862T Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, lo Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case ‘ Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. - Page 1 of 5 - OOQONUILWN \O 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Nétfiiféieé‘fifitiefififimiwfis‘fiefififi§¥207£1§ WWEOnmufilation qenerall. J (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified fiom holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces 0f the United States. TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CIVIL UNLIMITED DIVISION, the Judge in the instant case, AND all Parties to the Instant Case, and any other Interested Parties to the above captioned case: V NOTICE T0 THE STA TE CIVIL COURT, AND ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 0F RECORD IS HEREBY GIVEN: Plaintiff HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, natural living man, gives notice in the case sub judice, pursuant to C.C.P. §§ 394, 397, for which Plaintifi removes the instant case as to all parties and all causes 0f action, complaint, cross complaint(s), and counter claim(s). Plaintiff also gives notice that Plaintiff has the authority to remove the instant case and all related cross claims and counter claims and actions; and has removed the case(s) t0 a neutral county, pursuant to C.C.P. § 394 mandatory removal statute, and C.C.P. § 397 discretionary removal statute, due to Defendant Barbadillo’s employment 0n the City of Plaintiff's Notice of Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. - Page 2 of 5 - \OOOQQMAWNn-o NNNNNNNNNr-Ar-Ib-tr-A-IHHHHH OOQGUIAWNl-‘OOWQQMAWNHO Milpitas City Council. The removed instant case(s), Case No. 18-CV-321862, Stewart v Barbadillo et a1, are hereby ' " '~" "‘ ' ’ NMASE‘IMALBKGmmN, to the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CIVIL DIVISION UNLIMITED. [ In order to avoid bias due to public entity employee Defendant Milpitas City Councilman Barbadillo, wherein Plaintiff, is having his CIVIL RIGHTS, directly and systematically impaired and infringed upon in the Civil Division 0f this Court, by unconstitutional statutory laws and customs, practices, and policies having the force and efi‘ect of law in the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by the SUPERIOR COURT, 1t s Commissioners, and the OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, and multiple entities who are not a true party in interest, this case is removed to a neutral county. ] UL R0 slim (9 JUR'BHIE .-_« 1446 1d Resolution Trust Corp v. Bayside Developers, 43 F. 3d 1230 (9m Cilrcuitil9-94)(C1tauons Omitted). See also California ex. Rel. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District V. United States, 215 F.3d 1005, 101.1 (9th Circuit 2000)(sta11'ng that removal necessarily divests state court of its jurisdiction and noting that “following removal, any further proceedings in state court are considered in comm nonjudice and will be vacated even if the case is later remanded”) “Coram nonjudice” 'means that the “court” is no longer judicial in character (with regard to the removed proceedings) and accordingly has N0 JURISDICTION. _ This Court should take notice that, then, after removal, any actions taken by this court will be taken “in the complete absence of iurisdiction”, so that no immunity for any Plaintiff's Notice of Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. - Page 3 of 5 - \DOOQGUIAWNH NNNNNNNNNHHHv-IHHb-I-Am-tr-A ooqoxmAri-IowoofloxUI-thr-do ' frivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new violations of. Defendants’ will apply under 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988 (civil liability for costs & damages), or, for that matter, under 18 U.S.C. §§24l, 242 (criminal liability for civil rights infiingement). Further, the Divestiture Rule or Divestiture Doctrine also removes jurisdiction fiom the Court that the case(s) is/are removed fiom, until such time as the case(s) are remanded, with a letter of Remittiteur. The Court and attorneys should take notice that this SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SANTA CLARA, CIVIL DIVISION, is now WITHOUT JURISDICTION WHATSOEVER T0 CONTINUE THIS CASE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM REGARDING ALL MATTERS. THE DEFENDANTS WERE SERVED, OR SERVED THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD ON OR ABOUT Wednesday, 2/14/2018, AFTER PROPER FILING WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT CLERK. VERIFICATION The undersigned cettifies that the contents ofthis pleading are true and: (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation, and; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a non- law, and; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiaiy support afler a reasonable opportunity for fimher investigation or discovery, and; (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information. Further your Afiiant sayeth naught. m Date: February 14, 2018 By: HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, Plaintiff Plaintiff's Notice of Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 1B-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case .Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. - Page 4 of 5 - Councilmember Bax’oadillo | City of Milpitas http:lfwww.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/dtflteam/gany-barbadillo/ f 9 in Contact Us EI‘ Stay Informed It \fideo Tour Enter Keyword to Search fl HOME fl GOVERNMENT :3. RESIDENTS g BUSINESS ? l WANT TO... Councilmember Barbadillo Home / Teammate / Councilmembersarbadmo Councilmember Milpitas City Council Garry Barbadlllo City Elected: November 201 4 00””0“ ' Term Expires: November 2018 Elected Office.W ?mbglg Officials Blvd., Milpitas. CA 95035 :3 125133;: :33 24 zs‘zsm 23 29.3q Phone: 408 586-3024 Fax: 3‘ 'f'i‘ '72:, Mayor View My Calendar (408) 586-3056 Tran Email: Obarbadillo@0i.milpitas.ca.qov Vice Mayor ' ' Grim Current CounCII Committee " ‘_ g Assignments Councilmember Barbadillo o Parks, Recreation, and o City Council Lanflmasmte » 10f3 2/14/2018, 11:23 AM Councilmember Baxbadillo l City of Milpitas Councilmember Nunez Councilmember Phan Meetings City Council Agendas and Minutes Meeting Schedule Council Calendars Meeting Times: 1st and 3rd Tuesday each month 7:00pm Public Meeting Meeting Location: City Council Chambers 455 E. Calaveras Blvd. Milpitas, CA 95035 Main Office Contact: 408 586-3051 20f3 Cultural Resources Commission, Liaison o Recycling, and Source Reduction Advisory Commission, Liaison o Telecommunications Commission, Liaison o Association of Bay Area Governments, Voting Member General Assembly htlp :l/www.ci.milpitas.ca gov/dtfiteam/garry-barbadillo/ Transportation Subcommittee, Liaison o City Council Finance Subcommittee, Liaison o Cities Association of Santa Clara County Board Member, Alternate o League of California Cities Peninsula Division I Santa Clara Valley Water Commission __ ° PersonalBackgroundlnformation c!) Work Experience o Law Offices 0f Garry Barbadillo Community Involvement o Pro Bono Project of Santa Clara County's "Lawyers in the Library" Program o Volunteers in Various Civic, Non-Profit, and Community Events in Milpitas and throughout Santa Clara County Education o Juris Doctor Law Degree o Bachelor of Arts in Political Science Personal Garry is married to Vilma, a nurse in a local public hospital. They are proud parents of Derrick and Danielle, who are both excellent piano players and Tae Kwon Do athletes. Translate » 2/14/2018, 11:23 AM Councilmember Barbadillo l City of Milpitas 30f3 http://www.ci.milpitascagov/dt_teamlgany-balbadillo/ Maps Bike Paths Crime Mapping Flood Zones Parks © Copyright 201 6 City of Milpitas Quick Links Commissions Depanments Elected Officials News and Announcements Public Hearings a E-mail Webmaster Resources Activities Guide E-Plans E-Permits Flood Hazard Information Utility Payments Contact Us CityHan 9 455 E. Calaveras Blvd. Milpitas,CA 95035 ‘- (408)-5863000 0 www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 0 SiteMap City of Milpitas. California Accessibility Policy Translate » 2/14/2018, 11:23 AM \OWQO‘UIAMN 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21_ zé 23 24 25 26 27 28 HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart© (ABA # 02803 628) _uty PO Box 694 ENSan Jose, CA 95 106 AL £35831) Tele: (408) 217-4426 AMEDA For Petitioner/Plaintifi‘ F COUNTY C t3 I 5 2018 LERKOFmEESUP 31': ERICA 3Ami“;JRCOURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALI-FQR’N’IA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA- Civil Unlimited Division 1225 Fallon Street, Oakland, California 94612 l?! 8HIRH Prince William Bullock III ) Case NRGB Stewart©, the natural living man, ) Stewart /vs/ Barbadillo er al Petitioner ) /vs/ ) Plaintiff/Petifioner HIRH Prince Gany D. Barbadillo, SBN 261799, ) William Bullock III Stewart©’s Notice (private capacity); ) of Removal of Case 18-CV-321862, to Rajgsv Kumar Madpawat, SBN ) Neutral County (Alameda), as to all .2. 244855, (private capacity); Parties and all Actions ' " Timothy A. Griswold, SBN 258001, Note: This removal does not include (private capacity); ’ related Case No. 17EA000128 Kenneth Cleon Brooks, SBN )[Caliform'a Code of Civil Procedure § 394 167792, (private capacity); ) Mandatory Removal Pursuant fo Public ’ Respondents ) Entity Patty, § 397 Discretionary RemovalI , ) Pursuant to Public Entity Party, California No'te to Court Clerk: 18 U.S. Code ) Evidence Code §§ 451, 452(c), 452(d), §2071 -Con_cealment, removal, or ) 453, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule mutllatlon generally ) 7(b), 16, 26 thru45; RICO Statutes, (a) Whoever willfully and ) Threats Against Public Officials pursuant unlawfully conceals, removes, to California Penal Code; Harassing Calls; mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or Title 28 USC § 1443] attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, 'paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United Page 1 of 6 Plaintiff’s Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, £5. County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of Calitomia, County of Alameda. \Omflmmhwmr-A WQQUIAWNHOQWQOm-bWNHO States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. NOTICE 0F REMOVAL BYAFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF: HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) Comes now your Afi'lant: HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, being over the age of 18, makes these statements under oath and afler first being duly sworn according to law, states that he is your Affiant, and he believes these facts to be true to the best ofhis belief based upon first hand knowledge and states as follows: 1) This Affidavit is made in the CITY OF SAN JOSE, COUNTY 0F SANTA CLARA, on February 14, 2018, and describes events that have occurred within the COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 2) Your Affiant states that he is known as HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©. 3) Your Affiant states that HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, _is also known as Prince William or Prince, pursuant to court order of Judge Emede, January 16, 2018, case 17- EA-000128. 4) Your Affiant states that HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart© is a natural born living man, with clean hands, rectus in curia. 5) Your Affiant states that HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart© is competent, and makes these statements freely. 6) Your Afiiant states that HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart© has personal, first hand knowledge ofthe facts which are stated herein. 7) Your Afiiant states that the foregoing statements are true, correct, complete and not misleading. Page 2 of 6 Plaintiff‘s Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. \oooqoxmhwn.‘ NNNNNNNNNHI-lr-In-It-Ip-Ip-IHHH MQO’XUI-bUJNb-IOOOOQONUIAWNHO ~ 8) Your Affiant states that HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living i 15) Your Affiant states that denial of due process for the Plaintiff via failure to notice is a man, is not to be confused with either a deceased person, or a juristicPerson ', which is a legal ' fiction. 9) Your Affiant states that HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, does not hold the ofiice of ‘person ’. 10) Your Affiant states that all cases are civil cases, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 2. 11) Your Affiant states that civil cases. may be removed to other judicial districts or jurisdictions. 12) Your Afiiant states that there are no time limits for removal based upon civil rights in Title 28 U.S.C. § 1441. 13) Your Afiiant states that there are no time limits for removal based upon civil rights in Title 28 U.s.c. § 1.443. 14) Your Affiant states that 28 section 1443 states: ~ 28 U.S. Code § 1443 - Civil rights cases Any of the following civil actions or criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court may be temoved by the defendant to the district court ofthe United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction thereof; (2) For any act under color of authority derived from any law providing for equal rights, or for refiising to do any act on the ground that it would be inconsistent with such law. basis for this removal. '16) Your Affiant states that the California Constitution Article 1 Section 3, and 7 guarantee the protection ofPlaintiff‘s civil rights to due process. 17) Your Affiant states that the 4th, 5th, 6m, 7'“, and 14m Amendments to the Constitution of 1787 guarantee the protection of an individual’s civil rights. 18) Your Afliant states that the rulings and case law of any California Appellate Court, is binding and controlling on all California Superior Courts. Page 3 of 6 Plaintiff’s Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California,. County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. \OMQQU’I-b 10 11 .12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - of a civil right is sufficient cause to make a claim against any ofl'lcer ofthe United States. - California, County of Alameda. I9) Your Affiant states that the United States is a signatory to the Universal Postal Union treaty. 20) Your Affiant states that all coutts ofthe United States are legally bound by all provisions contained in treaties which the United States is a signatory. 21) Your Affiant states that all cases have a cross-complaint pursuant to Universal Postal Union treaty. 22) Your Affiant states that the Plaintiff", HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, is not the same as the all capitalized name cestua que trust established by the United States Department of the Treasury. 23) Your Affiant states that the undersigned Secured Party, HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, Dons NOT AGREE andHAs NEVER AGREED, to stand in as cargo in ‘rem ' for the all capitalized name cestua que trust. 24) Your Afiiant states that there is a distinct difference between the undersigned natural man and the all capitalized name cestua que trust. 25) Your Afiiant states that the secured party HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, is legally recognized and documented as distinct from the cestua que trust, by the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. 26) Your Affiant states that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is a collection agency subsidiary of the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. 27) Your Afiiant states that the secured party HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, has a separate EIN number from the all capitalized name cestua que trust, assigned by the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. 28) Your Affiant states that secured party HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, the natural living man, has the authority to act and sign on behalf of the all capitalized name cestua que trust pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code Article 3 Section 419 (UCC 3-419). 29) Your Afiiant states that secured party HIRH Prince WilliamBullock III Stewalt©, the natural living man, has a general power of attorney for the all capitalized name cestua que trust. 30) Your Affiant states that the individuals designated as Defendants in the instant removed case, have violated the civil rights ofthe Plaintifi‘ herein. 31) Your Afiiant states that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the mere violation Page 4 of 6 Plaintiff‘s Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of \OOONOflthri-c NNNNNNNNNv-IHHp-IHr-A-In-IHH OOQONUI-th-‘OOOOQQUIALANr-‘O 32) Your Afi'lant states that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the victim need not prove that any damage was done to make a claim against an officer who has violated the victims civil rights. 33) Your Afi'lant states that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that proof of the mere violation of the victims civil rights is sufl'lcient cause to make and establish a claim against the oficer. 34) Your Afliant states that Defendant Gn'swold, self identified as a judicial oflicer in the instant removed case, has violated the civil rights of the Plaintiff. 35) Your Affiant states that when a judge or other judicial ofl'lcer violates someone’s civil rights, the action rises from mere judicial error to judicial misconduct. 36) Your Affiant states that Defendant Griswold, self identified as a judicial ofl'lcer in the instant removed case is guilty ofjudicial misconduct. 37) Your Afiiant states when a state omcer violates the civil rights of another, they are considered a federal officer. 38) Your Affiant states that Defendants Barbadillo, Madnawat, Griswold, and Brooks are members of the state BAR association. 39) Your Affiant states that Defendants Barbadillo, Madnawat, Griswold, and Brooks are state judicial ofi'lcers. 40) Your Afliant states Defendants Barbadillo, Madnawat, Griswold, and Brooks, have violated the civil rights ofthe Plaintiff. 41) Your Afi'lant states Defendants Barbadillo, Madnawat, Griswold, and Brooks, have acted in conspiracy against Plaintifi‘ and Plaintiff’s rights. 42) Your Affiant states that at least one Defendant is a sitting member on the City Council for the City ofMilpitas. 43) Your Afi'lant states that the City ofMinitas is a political subdivision contained within the COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 44) Your Afiiant states that California Code of Civil Procedure (C.C.P.) § 394 provides for mandatory removal of cases containing public entities or employees thereof as parties, to a neutral county. 45) Your Afiiant states that California Code of Civil Procedure (C.C.P.) § 397 provides for discretionary removal of cases containing public entities or employees thereof as parties, to a neutral county. Page 5 of 6 Plaintiff’s Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321882, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. \OmflmmkmNp-A NNNNNNNNNp-nn-Ir-Ap-Ap-Ip-up-Ip-AHH OOQQUIAWNHOKOOOQQUI-bWNp-O 46) Your Afiiant states that the instant document serves as notice to all interested parties and their attorneys of record, that the instant case 180V321862 is removed pursuant to C.C.P. § 394 as to all parties and as to all actions, to the Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. 47) Your Afi'xant states that even if the instant case is removed improperly, the previous court has lost all jurisdiction until such time as the clerk ofthe remanded court receives a letter of remittiteur fi'om the removed to court, pursuant to Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4, California, SPANAIR S.A. et aI., Plaintifilv andAppellants, v. MCDONAELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. B205945. Decided: March 19, 2009. 48) Your Afiiant states that all orders issued by the removed from court prior to remand will , be stricken, even if the instant case is removed improperly, pursuant to 28 USC 1446(d). 49) Your Affiant, HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewart©, commands and demands that the instant case 18CV321862, Stewart v. Barbadillo et al, is removed pursuant to C.C.'P. § 394 as to all parties and as to all actions; to the Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, and all associated parties, actions, cross complaints and counter complaints, to that case, are removed from the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, to SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction. 50) Your Affiant states that case removal to a neutral county pursuant to C.C.P. §§ 394 or 397 is to prevent bias in the case. VERIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the contents ofthis pleading are true and: (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation, and; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a non- frivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law, and; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support afier a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery, and; (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information. Further your Affiant sayeth naught. Date: February 14,2018_ By: HIRH EW'fiEwmh HIRH Prince William Bullock III Stewa1t©, Plaintiff Page 8 of 6 Plaintiff's Notice of Removal from Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case 18-CV-321862, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, to Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction, Case . Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 E See Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) D See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s], not Notary) 1-... I\.'I Lt: J1. Signature of Document Signer No. 1 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 fif any) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the tmthfulness, accuracy. or validity of that document. State of Califgtia Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me Count of fl gal a, IE y M on this I day of EMMM a2, Mnthby Date oYear (1) ?V' ' 35. w+ 55’ (and (2) m'fl/ ). Name(s) of Signer(s) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who a peared before me. Signature Seal Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document._ Description of Attached Document . . Whamdaw'J- TitIe or Type of Document. MM_Document Date:mm,K Number of Pages: (Q Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: L) l l4” ©2014 NationaI Notary Association- www. NatIonalNotary rg- 1-800-US NOTARY (1- 800-876-6827) Item #5910
