NoticeCal. Super. - 6th Dist.August 30, 2017I&athryn C. Iolaus, Esq. - SBN 205923 Rebecca D. Martino, Esq. - SBN 236094 Solomon Pantuch, Esq. - SBN 309458 CODDINGTON, HICKS R DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94065-2133 Tel.: 650.592.5400 Fax: 650.592.5027 ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant IWanh Quoc Bui 10 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 15 DMITRY MAIZEL, Plaintiff, vs. I~ANH QUOC BUI, and DOES 1 - 10, Defendants. Case No. 17CV316966 DISCOVERY MOTION DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF NON- OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 17 19 20 21 22 23 Date: October 10, 2019 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: 19 Hon. Peter H. I~van Defendant IWanh Quoc Bui respectfully submits this Notice of Non-Opposition in support of defendant's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One and Request For 24 Sanctions. 25 Dated: October 3, 2019 26 CODDI G ON, HICKS R DANFORTH 28 By ebecca D. Martino Attorneys for Defendants I&hanh Quoc Bui l Defendant's Notice of Non-Opposition to Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery Case No: CGC-17-559981 629532 Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, on 10/3/2019 4:39 PM Reviewed By: Y. Chavez Case #17CV316966 Envelope: 3477750 17CV316966 Santa Clara - Civil Y. Chavez PROOF OF SERVICE California Code of Civil Procedure sections 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5 California Rule of Court rule 2.251 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b) I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300, Redwood City, California 94065. My electronic mail address is h orter chdla ers.com. 10 12 I am readily familiar with my employer's business practice for collection and processing of correspondence and documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service, mailing via overnight delivery, transmission by facsimile machine, and delivery by hand. On October 3, 2019, I served a copy of each of the documents listed below by placing said copies for processing as indicated herein. 13 14 DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 15 Electronic Transmission: The correspondence or documents were transmitted electronically by OneLegal as follows: 17 XX As authorized by Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6(d) and Rules of Court, Rule 2.253(b)(1)(A), I caused the document(s) listed above to be sent to the persons at the electronic notification addresses listed below. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 United States Mail:The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes with postage thereon fully prepaid on the above date placed for collection and mailing at my place of business to be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service at Redwood City, California on this same date in the ordinary course of business. PERSONS OR PARTIES SERVED: In Pro Per Drnitry Maizel 280 Los Palmos Way San Jose, CA 95119 Telephone: (415) 203-6210 formusor ahoo.com I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration wa ex d on October 3, 2019, Hele orter Court: Superior Court of California, Santa ClaraCoun'ctionNo: 17CV316966'ase Name: Maiqel u. Bui 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28