NoticeCal. Super. - 6th Dist.November 21, 2016CIV-020 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WTHOUT ATTORNEY: STATE BAR NO.: 177863 NAME: BISSCTIT Saffouri FIRM NAME: RAMEY LAW GROUP STREET ADDRESS: 3736 Mount Diablo Blvd., Suite 300 CITY: Lafayette STATE: CA TELEPHONE NO.: 925-284-2002 FAX NO. (if available) E-MAIL ADDRESS (if available): hussein@ramseylawgroup.com ATTORNEY FOR (name): Plaintiffs Robert and William Sommer ZIP CODE: 94549 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Santa Clara STREET ADDRESS: 191 N. First St. MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Jose, CA 95113 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert and William Sommer DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Celebuddy, Inc. and John Tran NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE CASE NUMBER: 16CV302986 1. Party intending to appear by telephone is lxi I Plaintiff/Petitioner (name): Robert and William Sommer Defendant/Respondent (name): Other (name): 2, The conference, hearing, or proceeding is for (describe): Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings set on (date):June 18, 2019 at (time):9:00am before (name of judicial officer, if known): Sunil Kulkarni Date: June 14, 2019 Hussein Saffouri (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) in (department): 8 (SIGNATURE) See Code of Civil Procedure section 367.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.670 to determine if a conference, hearing, or proceeding is one generally considered appropriate for telephone appearance. Note that a court may determine on a hearing-by-hearing basis that a personal appearance is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 367.5(c).) This form is intended only to provide written notice to a court and parties as provided in rule 3.670(h) of the California Rules of Court. Check with the court to determine how to make arrangements for telephone services for an appearance either directly with the court or through a court-appointed vendor. Read California Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h) to determine when you have to file and serve notice of the intent to appear by telephone. There are different deadlines depending upon the circumstances: (1) On a regularly noticed hearing, notice must be given at least two court days before the appearance (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(1)(6)) or, after receiving notice that another party will be appearing telephonically, by noon on the court day before the appearance (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(2)). (2) On an ex parte application, notice must be given by an applicant by 10:00 a.m. two court days before the hearing (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(3)(B)). Any party other than an applicant may give notice by 2:00 p.m. or the "close of business" (as that term is defined in rule 2.251) whichever is earlier, on the court day before an ex parte appearance. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670(h)(4).) P ge 1 oft Form Ap roved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California CIV-020 (Rev. January 1, 20161 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE Code of Civil Procedur § MITA Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.670 Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, on 6/14/2019 1:34 PM Reviewed By: Yuet Lai Case #16CV302986 Envelope: 3010899 CourtCall' CourtCall Appearance - Service Copy 6383 Arizona Circle Los Angeles, CA 90045 Phone: (888) 882-6878 Fax: (888) 883-2946 CourtCall.com Court Conference is a division of CourtCall® This document shall serve as notice of a CourtCall Appearance by the participant listed below in the referenced case. Others wishing to appear remotely should contact CourtCall, LLC at (888) 882-6878 or (310) 342-0888. Hussein Saffouri Ramsey Law Group Tel: (925) 284-2002 Fax: (925) 402-8053 Case Name: Robert Sommer vs. Celebuddy, Inc. Case Number: 02-16CV302986 Court Name: Santa Clara County Superior Court (CA) Dept/Judge: 8 / Judge Sunil R. Kulkarni Proceeding: Motion Date/Time: Tuesday, June 18th, 2019 at 9:00 AM PT Note: this is not a Confirmation of your CourtCall Appearance. Each participant must make his or her own arrangements with CourtCall. While clients can save money and Courts can become more efficient and generate revenue, CourtCall has the most impact upon practicing attorneys as it helps to give them their lives back. Attorneys can use the time they save using CourtCall to catch-up on other pressing matters, enjoy time with family and friends or otherwise take advantage of the time no longer spent traveling to and from Court. Call us for detai ls. There are no subscriptions or equipment to buy. COURTCALL VIDEO IS HERE! CourtCall is equipping Courtrooms of interested Judges with its state-of-the-art, browser-based video conferencing platform, enabling full video participation for traditional CourtCall Appearances. Lawyers only need a computer with sufficient bandwidth and a webcam to view and/or share video in accordance with a Judge's preferences. To learn more about video options, please ask a CourtCall representative. The foregoing information may have been obtained from court records which may not reflect recent calendar changes. If It is inaccurate because your appearance has been continued, please apply this information to the new date. If the matter is off calendar, you have no involvement in the case or you do not wish to use this service, please disregard this notice. Do not call the Court Clerk. Remote Appearances. Simplified. CourtCall Appearances are available for over 2,000 Judges nationwide, monthly. Please visit our website at www.courtcall.com for a complete across the US, Canada and other jurisdictions. with additional Courts being added list of participating Courts and Judges Hussein Saffouri SERVICE COPY FOR COURTCALLC) APPEARANCE Copyright © 2019 CourtCall, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE (CCP §§ 1013(a) and 2015.5; FRCP 5) I, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Contra Costa, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within action. My business address is Ramsey Law Group, 3736 Mount Diablo Boulevard, Suite 300, Lafayette, California, 94549. On June 14, 2019, I caused to be served the within NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE COURT CALL APPEARANCE - SERVCIE COPY on the following parties: Michael Avramidis, Esq. Law Offices of Timothy A. Pupach 95 S. Market Street, Suite 260 San Jose, CA 95113 [X] (BY FIRST CLASS) - I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail in Lafayette, California to be served on the parties as indicated on the Service List. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Lafayette, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. [ ] (BY CERTIFIED MAIL) - I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to be placed in the United States Mail in Lafayette, California. [ ] (BY EXPRESS MAIL OR ANOTHER METHOD OF DELIVERY PROVIDING FOR OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) [ ] (BY ELECTRONIC FILING AND/OR SERVICE) - I served a true copy, with all exhibits, electronically on designated recipients listed on the Service List on: (date) at (time) [ (FEDERAL EXPRESS) - I caused the envelope to be delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized to receive documents with delivery fees provided for. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on June 14, 2019, at Lafayette, CA. Tr na Audley 2 PROOF OF SERVICE