§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Steven Berrezueta, Appellant.

Brief

48 Cited authorities

  1. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 38,165 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

  2. Pennsylvania v. Mimms

    434 U.S. 106 (1977)   Cited 3,369 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officer's practice of ordering occupants out of the car during all traffic stops was not a constitutional violation

  3. People v. Romero

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8640 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 4,926 times

    No. 151. Argued October 18, 2006. Decided November 21, 2006. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 11, 2005. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of murder in the second degree. People v. Romero, 22 AD3d 287, affirmed. Center

  4. People v. Bleakley

    69 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 11,300 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Appellate Division committed reversible error when it "avoid[ed] its exclusive statutory authority to review the weight of the evidence in criminal cases"

  5. People v. Casey

    95 N.Y.2d 354 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 1,346 times
    Finding nonhearsay allegations including the complainant's supporting deposition, which stated that the order had been issued, was in effect, and that she had personally observed the defendant engage in conduct that violated the order could help to cure an alleged defect in the instrument premised on the failure to provide the underlying court order

  6. People v. Kalin

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2446 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 687 times
    In Kalin, 12 N.Y.3d 225, 878 N.Y.S.2d 653, 906 N.E.2d 381, the Court of Appeals examined an information which had charged the defendant with, among other things, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree for the possession of nine plastic bags of heroin.

  7. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,271 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.

  8. People v. Prochilo

    41 N.Y.2d 759 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 1,602 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a weapons frisk based on an officer's observation of an item in a man's pocket that "struck him immediately as . . . 'the outline of a gun'"

  9. People v. Hollman

    79 N.Y.2d 181 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 780 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable suspicion was required before narcotics officers could approach a passenger in a bus terminal and ask for permission to search the person's bag

  10. People v. Lane

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8641 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 458 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claim of insufficiency of evidence was not preserved for appellate review

  11. Section 1050.1 - Authorization and purpose

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 21 § 1050.1   Cited 2 times

    (a) The provisions of sections 1203-a(3) and 1204(5-a) of the Public Authorities Law provide the New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority with the power to make rules governing the conduct and safety of the public in the use and operation of the transit facilities of those authorities. (b) These rules are established by the New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority to promote safety, to facilitate