Zepuor Parsanian, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 30, 2011
0120110626 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 30, 2011)

0120110626

11-30-2011

Zepuor Parsanian, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.




Zepuor Parsanian,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120110626

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

Agency's letter dated September 21, 2010, declining to take action on

her request for official time for Agency No. 4F-900-0277-08/EEOC Hearing

No. 480-2009-00151X during which she represented a fellow Agency employee

who was terminated while in probationary status.

In its letter, the Agency declined to take action because the

Administrative Judge (AJ) assigned to EEOC Hearing No. 480-2009-00151X

stated that she would assume jurisdiction over the issue. However,

for reasons that remain unclear, when the assigned AJ issued her final

decision, she did not rule on the issue, causing Complainant to seek

relief from the Agency by seeking EEO counseling.

The Commission has held that the right to official time for a

representative flows from the complaining party, and therefore, a

denial of official time for a representative is properly raised by a

complaining party, and not his representative. See Lambert v. Social

Security Administration, EEOC Request No. 05970856 (October 8, 1998);

Barrett v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01A55067 (January 26,

2006). Complainant does not have standing to raise the issue of being

denied official time when serving as an EEO representative for other

employees.1 Therefore, we DENY this appeal.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 30, 2011

__________________

Date

1In Parsanian v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 0120093702 (Jan. 7,

2011), we also denied Complainant’s request for official time for

representing other federal employees in the EEO process.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120110626

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120110626