Yvonne D. Nelson, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 8, 2000
01993683 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 8, 2000)

01993683

12-08-2000

Yvonne D. Nelson, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area) Agency.


Yvonne D. Nelson v. United States Postal Service

01993683

December 8, 2000

.

Yvonne D. Nelson,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area)

Agency.

Appeal No. 01993683

Agency No. 4H370121696, 4H370006397

Hearing No. 250978292X, 250988058X

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal from the agency's final decision

concerning her equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as

amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. <1> The appeal is accepted pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405. Complainant alleges she was discriminated

against on the bases of race (African-American), sex (female), retaliation

(prior protected activity) and disability (dog bites resulting in injury

to right leg, post traumatic stress and depression) when:

(1) on June 18, 1996, she was placed on emergency suspension; and

November 15, 1996, she was not given proper assistance from an

occupational health nurse to return to work.<2>

For the following reasons, the Commission AFFIRMS the agency's final

decision.

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a), all post-hearing factual findings by

an AJ will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Substantial evidence is defined as �such relevant evidence as a reasonable

mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.� Universal

Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951)

(citation omitted). A finding regarding whether or not discriminatory

intent existed is a factual finding. See Pullman-Standard Co. v. Swint,

456 U.S. 273, 293 (1982).

After a careful review of the record, the Commission finds that the

AJ's decision properly summarized the relevant facts and referenced the

appropriate regulations, policies, and laws. The AJ queried whether

complainant established that she was an individual with a disability, or

otherwise established a prima facie case of discrimination on any basis

inasmuch as she failed to establish that individuals outside of any of

her protected classes were treated more favorably than she under similar

circumstances. We note that the record supports the AJ's finding that

complainant failed to present evidence that any of the agency's actions

were in retaliation for complainant's prior EEO activity or were motivated

by discriminatory animus toward complainant's sex, race or disabilities.

Accordingly, we need not determine whether complaint was an individual

with a disability, as we discern no basis to disturb the AJ's ultimate

determination that complainant failed to establish discrimination.

Therefore, after a careful review of the record, we AFFIRM the agency's

final decision.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 8, 2000

Date

1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations

governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process went into effect.

These regulations apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at

any stage in the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission

will apply the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in

deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be

found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2 Complainant, represented by counsel, made no objection at the hearing,

to framing the issues as outlined herein. Hearing Transcript at 7.