Worzella Publishing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 15, 1958121 N.L.R.B. 78 (N.L.R.B. 1958) Copy Citation 78 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 4. We find, in agreement with the parties, that the following em- ployees of the Employer constitute a unit appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of- the Act: All production and maintenance employees at theEmployer's plants at Rockford, Ottawa, Bloomington, Urbana, Champaign, Pana,,and Decatur, Illinois, including working foremen, dough mixers, ovenmen, machine men, open kettle friers, bench men, pan rackers, roll panners, rackers, and pan greasers, but excluding office and plant clerical employees, guards, professional employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act. 5. In its brief, the-Petitioner requests that, if the Board directs an election, the Board place- on the ballot, in lieu of the Petitioner, the Illinois Bargaining Association.is BCW, however, objects to placing the Association on the ballot. In a motion to intervene filed by the Association after the hearing, it is alleged that, after the hearing herein at a meeting noticed to all employees of the Employer, a reso- lution was adopted authorizing the establishment of the Association to act as the bargaining representative of the-Employer's employees in the existing contract unit. BCW does not dispute these allegations and objects to granting the Petitioner's requeet-_t6 place the Association on the ballot only because "the -request was based upon evidence de- literately created subsequent to the close of the hearing in this matter." Neither the fact that the Association was formed after the hearing nor the motives underlying its formation are material to the disposi- tion of Petitioner's request. In the absence of any valid objection thereto, we shall grant such request. [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.] vene filed after the bearing by Local 189 of ABC ,'' and by Illinois Bargaining Asseelstion for the Good & welfare of Purity Employees e'i8a, Baitay and Coc fectla ii gy workers Internatlviial Union, AFL-CIO, hereinafter variously- called Abe Illinois, Bar- gaining Association or the Association. -10 See footnote 15. . Worzella Publishing Company and International Printing Press- menzand Assistants' Union of North America , AFL-CIO, Peti- tioner. Case No. 18 RC-3576, July,15, 1958 - DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION - UpQn a petition duly filed uilder-Section,9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing. was held lore Jack R. Carrier, hearing officer. " Thee hearing officer's rulings ode at the hearing are free from pre judicial, error and are hereby afiirined. - 121 NLRB No. 18. WORZELLA PUBLISHING COMPANY 79. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Leedom and Members Bean and Fanning]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain em- ployees of the Employer. 3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The Petitioner seeks to represent a unit of printing employees at, the Employer's Stevens Point, Wisconsin, plant. The Employer op- poses the unit contention of the Petitioner and asserts that the only appropriate unit is one composed of all of its employees, including, in addition to those sought by Petitioner, various bindery employees and stockroom, shipping and receiving, and maintenance employees. There is no history of bargaining for any of its employees involved herein. The Employer operates a commercial printing and bookbinding establishment and publishes two Polish language newspapers. The unit sought by the Petitioner comprises letterpress operators, linotype operators, hand compositors, stereotypers, and lithographic employees, their assistants and apprentices. These employees, about 20 in num- ber, comprise all the employees of the Employer engaged in its print- ing operations. In addition the Employer has about 30 employees in the following departments : hand binding, bindery, shipping and re- ceiving, stockroom and maintenance. The printing employees and certain of the bindery employees are required to serve an apprenticeship of 4 to 6 years. All the printing employees, except the lithographic employees, are under the immediate supervision of Joseph Tuszka, who also supervises the hand binding operation and the stockroom. The lithographic employees,are ,under separate immediate supervision, and do not interchange with other printing employees. The record shows, however, that there is some interchange, the extent of which is not specified, between the printing employees and the bindery employees. In view of this interchange, the common supervision of certain of the printing and nonprinting employees by Tuszka, as related above, and the fact that its printing, and other employees work in the same rooms, without any intervening partitions, the Employer contends that only a''plantwide unit is appropriate. We do not believe, how- ever, that there is sufficient integration between the printing and bindery operations to preclude finding appropriate a separate unit of printing employees, as sought by the Petitioner. ; The Board normally finds that the various categories of printing employees, i. e., (1) lithographic employees, (2) letterpress operators 80 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and (3) compositors-here involved constitute separate appropriate units.' However, where, as here, the only unit sought is one combin- ing two or more of the foregoing groups, and the employer does not object to the proposed unit on the ground of the joinder of such groups in a single unit, the Board finds the combined unit appropriate 2 We find, therefore, that the following employees constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the mean- ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act. All letterpress pressmen, apprentice pressmen, all letterpress press assistants, apprentice press assistants, offset pressmen, offset press assistants, rotary pressmen, hand compositors, linotype operators and apprentices, stereotypers, offset cameramen, strippers, layout em- ployees, platemakers, opaquers, and darkroom employees at the Em- ployer's Stevens Point, Wisconsin, plant, but excluding employees in the hand binding department, bindery department, stockroom, shipping and receiving- department, maintenance department, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act 3 [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.] McQuiddy Printing Company, 116 NLRB 1114 (lithographing employees ; letterpress operators ) and Everlast Process Printing Co, 98 NLRB 1313 ( linotype operators and compositors). 2 Drug Package Co., Inc., 101 NLRB 1123, 1124-1125. 3 The unit finding conforms substantially to the unit request of Petitioner. Calumet Contractors Association and Christian Building Trades Local 12, Christian Labor Association of U. S., Petitioner. Case No. 13-RC-5479. June 30, 1958 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before a hearing .officer of the National Labor Relations Board. His rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are affirmed.' Pursuant to Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers herein to a three-member panel [Chairman Leedom and Members Rodgers and Jenkins]. Upon the entire record, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organization named below claims to represent certain employees of the Employer. 1 The hearing officer properly permitted various building trade craft unions, herein called the Intervenors , to intervene for the sole purpose of protesting the appropriateness .of the unit . See Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 91 NLRB 615 ( footnote 1). 121 NLRB No. 16. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation