William D. Morris, Complainant, William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 13, 2000
05990139 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 13, 2000)

05990139

09-13-2000

William D. Morris, Complainant, William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency), Agency.


William D. Morris v. Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency),

Request No. 05990139

September 13, 2000

.

William D. Morris,

Complainant,

William S. Cohen,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Defense Logistics Agency),

Agency.

Request No. 05990139

Appeal No. 01962984

Agency No. DM-92-056

Hearing No. 170-95-8281X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The agency initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in William

D. Morris v. Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency), EEOC Appeal

No. 01962984 (October 1, 1998).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material

fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial

impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b)). The agency's request is denied.

However, based upon review of the record, the Commission finds that the

previous decision's order should be modified. The previous decision

awarded complainant back pay between February 27, 1992 and June 8, 1992.

The record indicates that complainant was off duty from April 11,

1992 through June 8, 1992, due to an on-the-job injury and received

workers' compensation benefits. Furthermore, the EEOC Administrative

Judge determined and the previous decision affirmed that the agency

did not discriminate against complainant during this relevant time

period because complainant was not at work. Accordingly, we find that

the previous decision's Order should be modified and the agency shall

determine the appropriate amount of back pay, interest, and other benefits

due complainant, for any work missed by complainant between February 27,

1992 and April 10, 1992, rather than between February 27, 1992 and June 8,

1992.

After a review of the agency's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC

Appeal No. 01962984 is modified as discussed herein. There is no further

right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this

request for reconsideration.

ORDER

1. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall determine the appropriate amount of back pay,

interest and other benefits due complainant, for any work missed by the

complainant between February 27, 1992 and April 10, 1992, because of the

agency's failure to accommodate the complainant's medical restrictions,

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.501. Complainant shall cooperate in the

agency's efforts to compute the amount of back pay and benefits due,

and shall provide all relevant information requested by the agency.

If there is a dispute regarding the exact amount of back pay and/or

benefits, the agency shall issue a check to complainant for the

undisputed amount within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the

agency determines the amount it believes to be due. Complainant may

petition for enforcement or clarification of the amount in dispute.

The petition for clarification or enforcement must be filed with the

Compliance Officer, at the address referenced in the statement entitled

"Implementation of the Commission's Decision."

2. Within ten (10) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall give complainant a notice of his right to submit

objective evidence (pursuant to the guidance given in Carle v. Department

of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01922369 (January 5, 1993)) in support of

his claim for compensatory damages within forty-five (45) calendar days

of the date complainant receives the agency's notice. The agency shall

complete the investigation on the claim for compensatory damages within

seventy-five (75) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final.

Thereafter, the agency shall process the claim in accordance with 29

C.F.R. 1614.108(f).

3. Within sixty (60) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall provide training to all responsible management

officials in the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 regarding

their obligation to provide a reasonable accommodation to an employee

with a disability. Documentation evidencing completion of such training

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer within thirty (30) calendar

days thereafter.

4. The agency shall post at the Defense Distribution Region East,

Warehousing Division, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, copies of the attached

notice. Copies of the notice, after being signed by the agency's duly

authorized representative, shall be posted by the agency within thirty

(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, and shall

remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places,

including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted.

The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are

not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. The original

signed notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer within ten

(10) calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

5. The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include supporting documentation.

POSTING ORDER (G1092)

The agency is ORDERED to post at its Defense Distribution Region East,

Warehousing Division, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, copies of the attached

notice. Copies of the notice, after being signed by the agency's duly

authorized representative, shall be posted by the agency within thirty

(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, and shall

remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places,

including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted.

The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not

altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. The original signed

notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited

in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision,"

within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H1199)

If complainant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(1)(iii)), he/she is entitled to

an award of reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the

complaint. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall

be paid by the agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of

fees to the agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for

attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501.

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0400)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER

ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission.

If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE

COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD,

IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 13, 2000

__________________

Date

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

An Agency of the United States Government

This Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") dated ___________ which

found that a violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 791

et. seq., has occurred at the Department of Defense, Defense Logistics

Agency, Defense Distribution Region East, Warehousing Division, New

Cumberland, Pennsylvania (hereinafter "DDRE").

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee

or applicant for employment because of the person's RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, or PHYSICAL or MENTAL DISABILITY with respect

to hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, or other terms, conditions

or privileges of employment.

The DDRE supports and will comply with such Federal law and will not

take action against individuals because they have exercised their rights

under law.

The DDRE has been found to have denied a reasonable accommodation to

an employee with a disability by failing to timely reassign him from

a warehousing job to an office job. As a result, the agency has been

ordered by the EEOC to award the employee back pay for any missed work

opportunities, and award appropriate compensatory damages and attorney's

fees to the employee. Further, the agency has been ordered to provide

training in the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act to the responsible

management officials at the DDRE who were responsible for engaging in

discrimination. The DDRE will ensure that officials responsible for

personnel decisions and terms and conditions of employment will abide

by the requirements of all Federal equal employment opportunity laws

and will not retaliate against employees who file EEO complaints.

The DDRE will not in any manner restrain, interfere, coerce, or retaliate

against any individual who exercises his or her right to oppose practices

made unlawful by, or who participates in proceedings pursuant to,

Federal equal employment opportunity law.

______________________________

Date Posted: ____________________

Posting Expires: ________________

29 C.F.R. Part 1614

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.