Warwick Lumber Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 7, 194878 N.L.R.B. 107 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of PAUL GILL AND W. H.. VAN LANDINGHAM, CO-PART-- NERS D/B/A WARWICK LUMBER COMPANY, EMPLOYER and INTERNA- TIONAL WOODWORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO, PETITION ER Case No. 10-RC-56.-Decided July 7,1948 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed,' hearing in this case .was held at Cuth- bert, Georgia, on March 4, 1948, before Gilbert Cohen, hearing officer- The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju- dicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER The Employer, a copartnership, maintains and operates a plant at Warwick, Georgia, where it is engaged in the production of planed lumber. From November 21, 1947, when it acquired this plant, to March 4, 1948, the hearing date, it purchased raw materials consisting- of logs and lumber, valued at approximately $15,000, all within the State of Georgia. During the same period, the Employer's sales of finished products amounted to approximately $30,000. Such sales were made pursuant to an oral agreement whereby the Employer sold. 99 percent of its finished products to Sauter Lumber Company, a whole- sale firm also located in Georgia, and shipped them for that Company 1 The Employer moved to dismiss the petition on the ground, inter alia, that the petition as originally filed named the Employer' s predecessor and that an entirely new petition should have been filed . The petition was amended prior to the hearing by correcting the, Employer 's name in the title. The record shows that the Employer was fully apprised of the Petitioner ' s claim and that it has been aware at all times that this matter concerned its employees . Moreover , the Employer participated in the hearing . There is no prejudice under these circumstances , and we, therefore, deny the motion to dismiss with respect to this ground. Matter of La Salle-Crittenden Press, Inc., 72 N. L. R. B. 1166 . We also find no merit in the other bases of the motion to dismiss inasmuch as the representative showing in support of the petition , as well as the Petitioner's compliance status , are not subject to collateral attack. Matter of Lion Oil Company, 76 N. L. R. B. 565. 78 N. L. R. B., No. 20 107 108 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD directly from,the Employer's plant. Approximately $6,000 worth of such finished products during this period was shipped to customers of Sauter Lumber Company outside the State of Georgia and about $24,000 worth to that Company's customers within the State. We find, contrary to the contention of the Employer, that it is engaged in activities affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act.2 H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED 11 The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION We find that a question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IT. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Petitioner seeks a unit comprising all production and mainte- nance employees, excluding salesmen, office workers, guards, profes- sional employees, and supervisors. The Employer is in general agree- ment with the proposed unit. There is a, question, however, concerning the alleged supervisory status of graders and lumber and log checkers and whether employees classified as firemen are watchmen. The record shows that the lumber checker, log checker, and grader direct employees in the performance of their duties, and have the authority to recommend effectively the hiring and discharging of em- ployees as well as changes in rates of pay. The lumber checker also acts as yard foreman. Under the circumstances, we are of the opinion that they are supervisors within the meaning of the Act. The night firemen act as watchmen 15 minutes out of every hour. During the remaining 45 minutes, they take care of the dry kiln and fire one of the boilers. The day firemen fire two boilers and perform general unskilled labor when the boilers are not in operation. Day and night firemen are interchangeable and carry no arms. Inasmuch as these employees spend only an insubstantial part of their time as watchmen,3 we are of the opinion that they are not guards within the meaning of the Act and that therefore they should be included in the unit. = See Matter of McCar ty Manufacturing Company , 59 N. L . R B 1244. Matter of Carolina Metal Products, Inc, 76 N L R. B 644. WARWICK LUMBER COMPANY 109 Accordingly, we find that all production and maintenance employees, excluding checkers , salesmen, office workers, guards , office and clerical employees , professional employees , students and trainees of any em- ployees who themselves are excluded from the unit, and supervisors constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Warwick Lumber Company, Warwick, Georgia, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Region in which this case was heard, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay -roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off , but ex- cluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election , and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement , to determine whether or not they desire to be repre- sented, for purposes of collective bargaining, by International Wood- workers of America, CIO. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation