Warren E. Funston, Appellant,v.Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 14, 1999
01981575 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 14, 1999)

01981575

01-14-1999

Warren E. Funston, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Warren E. Funston v. Department of the Navy

01981575

January 14, 1999

Warren E. Funston, )

Appellant, )

)

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01981575

) Agency No. 98-44466-002

)

Richard J. Danzig, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Navy, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed

allegation (a) in appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a). In allegation (a), appellant

indicated that he was discouraged from applying for jobs when he received

negative and false comments from two agency employees. The record

indicates that the incidents involved alleged discriminatory comments

which were not accompanied by any concrete and/or personnel action against

appellant. The agency indicated that appellant was eligible to apply for

positions under the merit promotion process. The Commission has held that

a remark or comment, unaccompanied by concrete action, is not a direct

and personal deprivation sufficient to render an individual aggrieved.

See Henry v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05940695 (February 9, 1995).

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed

allegations (b), (c), and (d) in appellant's complaint, pursuant to

29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b), due to untimely EEO Counselor contact. In the

subject allegations, appellant indicated that he was denied half of the

cost of living allowance increase of his previous grade, WG-10, step 5;

he was not considered fairly for other jobs; and he was not regarded

as having a permanent disability. The record, undisputed by appellant,

indicates that the alleged incidents occurred sometime between 1994 and

early 1996, and appellant did not contact an EEO Counselor until July

26, 1997, which was beyond the 45-day time limit set by the regulations.

On appeal, appellant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence

to show that he contacted an EEO Counselor with regard to the subject

allegations in a timely manner pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1).

Based on the foregoing, the agency's final decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

January 14, 1999

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations