Viola D. Johnson-Washington, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 12, 2009
0120091892 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 12, 2009)

0120091892

06-12-2009

Viola D. Johnson-Washington, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Viola D. Johnson-Washington,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091892

Agency No. 4H327002909

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated February 17, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

In a complaint dated January 22, 2009, complainant alleged that she was

subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American) and

color (Brown) when she was subjected to her third route inspection within

six months. The inspections occurred on June 11, July 16, and October

29, 2008. In its final decision, the agency dismissed the complaint,

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim.

The instant appeal followed. Complainant does not make any new arguments

on appeal.

To the extent that the agency dismissed the matter for untimely EEO

counselor contact, stating that complainant did not contact the EEO

counselor until December 8, 2008, the Commission disagrees. The Commission

finds complainant is alleging she is receiving route inspections too

frequently and as such her EEO counselor contact was within 45 days of

the third inspection. Complainant would not have known of the frequency

when the first or second inspection was given.

However, the Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim

under the EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that she

suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of

employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the

Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Complainant does

not allege that any adverse action occurred as a result of the route

inspections. Moreover, to the extent that complainant is alleging that

she was being subjected to discriminatory harassment, we note that a

complainant may assert a cause of action if the discriminatory conduct

was so severe or pervasive that it created a work environment abusive to

complainant because of her race, gender, religion, national origin, age or

disability. Rideout v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01933866

(November 22, 1995) (citing Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17,

22 (1993)) request for reconsideration denied EEOC Request No. 05970995

(May 20, 1999). In applying this standard to this case, we conclude

that the events as described by complainant, even assumed to be true

and considered together, do not create a direct and personal deprivation

sufficient to render her aggrieved for the purposes of Title VII.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 12, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120091892

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120091892