Velda F.,1 Complainant,v.Robert Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 15, 20190120181190 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 15, 2019) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Velda F.,1 Complainant, v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency. Appeal No. 0120181190 Hearing No. 530-2014-00208X Agency No. 200H-0460-2013103453 DECISION On February 20, 2018, Complainant filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) claiming that the Agency was not in compliance with its December 14, 2017 final order implementing the decision of an EEOC Administrative Judge finding discrimination. The appeal is accepted pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.401(e).2 BACKGROUND During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Clinical Pharmacist, GS-12, at the Agency’s Medical Center in Wilmington, Delaware. Complainant filed an EEO complaint claiming that she was subjected to discrimination based on her race (Black) when she applied, and interviewed for the position of Associate Pharmacy 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission notes that Complainant’s appeal is referred to a Petition for Enforcement. However, a Petition for Enforcement is only available to enforce an order of the Commission itself. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503. Therefore, we will address Complainant’s appeal as a claim regarding the Agency’s noncompliance with its own final order, dated December 14, 2017. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.504. 0120181190 2 Chief, GS-0660-13 (Vacancy ID Number: 828101), but on May 23, 2013 received a non- selection notice. Following a hearing on the complaint, an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) concluded Complainant had established her discrimination claim. On December 14, 2017, the Agency issued its Final Order fully implementing the AJ’s decision. The Agency also implemented the AJ’s order, dated October 25, 2017, which required the Agency to take the following actions: 1. Offer Complainant, no later than 45 calendar days after the date the AJ’s decision becomes final, the position of GS-0660-13 Assistant Chief, Pharmacy Services at the Wilmington, Delaware VA Medical Center, or if no such position now exists, a substantially equivalent GS-13 position at the same level and rate of pay that Complainant would currently hold if she had been selected for the position in May 2013. 2. Determine the appropriate amount of back pay, if any (with interest, if applicable) and other benefits due Complainant, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501, no later than 45 calendar days after the date the AJ’s decision becomes final. 3. Provide eight (8) hours of in-person EEO training to the responsible management official and the Director of the facility regarding their responsibilities under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. 4. Post a notice of the finding. 5. Pay Complainant $7,000.00 in nonpecuniary compensatory damages within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the AJ’s decision becomes final. 6. Pay attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $21,189.53 within thirty (30) days of the date the AJ’s decision becomes final. On February 9, 2018, Complainant, through counsel, notified the Agency that it had until February 16, 2018 to comply with the AJ’s order. On February 20, 2018, Complainant, through counsel, filed an appeal asserting that the Agency had not fully complied with its December 14, 2017 final order. Specifically, Complainant asserts, that as of February 16, 2018, the Agency failed to: (1) offer Complainant the Assistant Chief, Pharmacy Services position or a substantially equivalate position, (2) pay Complainant any portion of the backpay not in dispute and make any final calculations on the backpay amount in dispute despite some discussion between Complainant and the Agency; (3) provide eight hours of EEO training to the responsible management official and Director; and (4) post a notice of the finding. 0120181190 3 Complainant, through counsel, also submits an affidavit, dated July 12, 2018, claiming that the “Agency has employed retaliatory tactics in combining three (3) separate positions into one (1) position rather than simply offering [her] an equivalent position as ordered by the AJ.” Specifically, Complainant states that the Agency offered her an Associate Chief of Pharmacy Information, Quality Assurance and Pharmacy Operations for the Community Based Outpatient Clinics (GS-660-13) with 50% clinical functions, effective May 3, 2018. Complainant claims that this position combines three separate positions – Pharmacy ADPAC, Quality Assurance; Associate Chief of CBOCs, Residency Director; and Clinical Pharmacy Specialist. The Agency has not responded to Complainant’s appeal. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS When discrimination is found, the Agency must provide Complainant with a remedy that constitutes full, make-whole relief to restore her as nearly as possible to the position that she would have occupied absent the discrimination. See, e.g., Franks v. Bowman Transp. Co., 424 U.S. 747, 764 (1976); Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 418-19 (1975); Adesayna v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 01933395 (July 21, 1994); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501. Upon review, we cannot determine whether the Agency is in full compliance with the relief ordered. The Agency has not responded to Complainant’s appeal or provided any documentation supporting that it has implemented the ordered relief. Accordingly, we will remand this matter to the Agency and order compliance with the AJ’s order. CONCLUSION Because the Agency has not provided any documentation establishing compliance, we remand this matter to the Agency to provide relief consistent with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501 and the decision of the Administrative Judge, as restated, and in the Order below. ORDER To the extent that it has not already done so, the Agency is ORDERED to provide the following relief to Complainant within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this decision, unless other time deadlines are herein ordered: 1. The Agency shall offer Complainant retroactive placement in the position of GS-0660-13 Assistant Chief, Pharmacy Services at the Wilmington, Delaware VA Medical Center, or if no such position now exists, a substantially equivalent GS-13 position. The position 0120181190 4 shall be at the level and rate of pay that Complainant would currently hold if she had been selected for the position in May 2013.3 2. The Agency shall determine the appropriate amount of back pay, if any (with interest, if applicable) and other benefits due Complainant, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501. Complainant shall cooperate in the Agency’s efforts to compute the amount of back pay and benefits due, and shall provide all relevant information requested by the Agency. The Agency shall provide to Complainant a clear and detailed, plain language explanation of its back pay calculations, including the calculation of all benefits provided to Complainant and providing explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations, for example, that are not familiar to others reviewing the calculations or that contains language peculiar to the Agency. The Agency shall also provide documentation supporting its calculations and information concerning who prepared the computations and any relevant Agency policy or Office of Personnel Management guidelines. The Agency shall afford Complainant at least sixty (60) days to respond to its back pay and other calculations. Complainant must cooperate with the Agency in providing information requested by the Agency where the information is appropriate and relevant to calculating a back pay determination. If there is a dispute regarding the exact amount of back pay and/or benefits, the Agency shall issue a check to Complainant for the undisputed amount within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the Agency determines the amount it believes to be due. 3. The Agency shall provide eight (8) hours of in-person EEO training to the responsible management official and the Director of the facility regarding their responsibilities under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. 4. The Agency shall post copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after being signed by the Agency’s duly authorized representative, shall be posted and maintained for 365 consecutive days, in conspicuous places at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Wilmington, Delaware, including all places where notices to employees and applicants for employment are customarily posted; the Agency shall take 3 The Commission has consistently held that a “substantially equivalent” position is one that is similar in duties, responsibilities, and location (reasonable commuting distance) to the position for which the complainant originally applied. See, e.g., Monroig v. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, EEOC Petition No. 04A40029 (Sept. 29, 2005); Spicer v. Dep't of the Interior, EEOC Petition No. 04980007 (Sept. 24, 1998); Patterson v. Dep't of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 05940079 (Oct. 21, 1994). The burden is on the Agency to establish that the position offered to Complainant in fact is substantially equivalent to the position lost. See Rai v. Dep't of the Interior, EEOC Appeal No. 01901186 (May 17, 1990). We note that Complainant has asserted that the position offered to her in May 2018 was not substantially equivalent because it was the combination of three other positions. If there is a dispute concerning the position offered to Complainant, the Agency must provide evidence that it is substantially equivalent to the one she was not selected for. 0120181190 5 reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other materials. 5. The Agency is ordered to pay Complainant $7,000.00 in nonpecuniary compensatory damages. 6. The Agency is ordered to pay attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $221,189.53. The Agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as provided in the statement entitled “Implementation of the Commission’s Decision.” The report shall include documentation verifying that the correction action has been implemented. POSTING ORDER (G0617) The Agency is ordered to post at its Medical Center facility copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after being signed by the Agency's duly authorized representative, shall be posted both in hard copy and electronic format by the Agency within 30 calendar days of the date this decision was issued, and shall remain posted for 60 consecutive days, in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted. The Agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. The original signed notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer as directed in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision," within 10 calendar days of the expiration of the posting period. The report must be in digital format, and must be submitted via the Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). ATTORNEY'S FEES (H1016) If Complainant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e)(1)(iii)), she is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the complaint. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall be paid by the Agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees to the Agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision was issued. The Agency shall then process the claim for attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0719) Under 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c) and §1614.502, compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory. Within seven (7) calendar days of the completion of each ordered corrective action, the Agency shall submit via the Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP) supporting documents in the digital format required by the Commission, referencing the compliance docket number under which compliance was being monitored. Once all compliance is complete, the Agency shall submit via FedSEP a final compliance report in the digital format required by the Commission. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The Agency’s final report must contain supporting documentation when previously not uploaded, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant and his/her representative. 0120181190 6 If the Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409. Failure by an agency to either file a compliance report or implement any of the orders set forth in this decision, without good cause shown, may result in the referral of this matter to the Office of Special Counsel pursuant to 29 CFR § 1614.503(f) for enforcement by that agency. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0617) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Complainant’s request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The agency’s request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party. 0120181190 7 Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610) This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations August 15, 2019 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation