Vatech Co., Ltd. et al.Download PDFPatent Trials and Appeals BoardFeb 1, 20212020001535 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 1, 2021) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 15/301,469 10/03/2016 Tae Woo KIM 810.0072 9663 76277 7590 02/01/2021 IP LEGAL SERVICES, LLC P.O. Box 651325 Sterling, VA 20165 EXAMINER FOX, DANIELLE A ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2884 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 02/01/2021 ELECTRONIC Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the following e-mail address(es): email@iplsllc.com PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________ Ex parte TAE WOO KIM, IN JAE BAEK, and SOO BONG LEE ____________ Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, MONTÉ T. SQUIRE, and JANE E. INGLESE, Administrative Patent Judges. INGLESE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant1 requests review under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1–17.2 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We REVERSE. 1 We use the word “Appellant” to refer to the “applicant” as defined in 37 C.F.R. § 1.42. Appellant identifies Vatech Co., Ltd. as the real party in interest. Appeal Brief filed July 15, 2019 (“Appeal Br.”) at 3. 2 Final Office Action entered December 14, 2018 (“Final Act.”) at 1. Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 2 CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER Appellant claims an X-ray emission apparatus (independent claim 1), and an X-ray source (independent claim 7). Claims 1 and 7 illustrate the subject matter on appeal, and read as follows: 1. An X-ray emission apparatus comprising: a main body including a cartridge mounting part configured to allow an X-ray source to be replacebley mounted therein, wherein the X-ray source generates X-rays onto an X-ray irradiation path, and the X-ray source includes: a cathode electrode located at a first end and having a nanostructure to be used as an electron emission source; an anode electrode located at a second end having a target surface to emit the X-rays; and a housing to secure and insulate the cathode electrode and the anode electrode, and the housing configured to expose a cathode electrode terminal connected to the cathode electrode and an anode electrode terminal connected to the anode electrode to an outside thereof, wherein the cathode electrode terminal and the anode electrode terminal differ from each other in at least one of exposure direction, height, size, and shape, and the cartridge mounting part includes first and second connection terminals connected with the anode electrode terminal and the cathode electrode terminal, respectively. 7. An X-ray source comprising: a cathode electrode having a nanostructure to be used as an electron emissions source; an anode electrode having a target surface to emit X-rays by electron collision; and a housing to secure and insulate the cathode electrode and the anode electrode, and the housing configured to expose a cathode electrode terminal connected to the cathode electrode and an anode electrode terminal connected to the anode electrode to an outside thereof, Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 3 wherein the cathode electrode terminal and the anode electrode terminal differ from each other in at least one of exposure direction, height, size, and shape, wherein the X-ray source is adapted to be replaceably mounted to an X-ray emission apparatus in a cartridge-type manner. Appeal Br. 15–16 (Claims Appendix) (emphasis and spacing added). REJECTION The Examiner maintains the rejection of claims 1–17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kim, et al. (KR 10-2007-0038849 A, published April 11, 2007) in view of Sato, et al. (JP 2012-079449 A, published April 19, 2012)3,4 in the Examiner’s Answer entered October 23, 2019 (“Ans.”). FACTUAL FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS Upon consideration of the evidence relied upon in this appeal and each of Appellant’s contentions, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection of 3 The Examiner refers to this reference as “Canon,” the applicant. We, however, refer to this reference as “Sato,” the surname of the first-named inventor. 4 The Examiner cites numerous paragraphs of “Kim” and “Canon” (Sato) in the Final Action. Final Act. 3–4. We note that Kim was published in Korean and Canon (Sato) was published in Japanese, but full-length English translations of these references are not included in the electronic file wrapper of the present application, although it appears that Appellant did submit copies of English translations of both references with an Information Disclosure Statement filed October 3, 2016. The identity of the documents cited by the Examiner in the Final Action, therefore, is not apparent on the record before us. Consequently, in this Decision, we cite to English translations of Kim and Sato available from the European Patent Office. In the event of further prosecution of this application, we advise the Examiner to make of record the Kim and Canon (Sato) documents cited in the Final Action. Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 4 claims 1–17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for reasons set forth in the Appeal and Reply Briefs, and below. We need address only independent claims 1 and 7, which both recite, in part, an X-ray source comprising a cathode electrode, an anode electrode, and a housing configured to expose a cathode electrode terminal connected to the cathode electrode and an anode electrode terminal connected to the anode electrode to an outside thereof. The Examiner finds that Kim discloses an X-ray source comprising a cathode electrode, an anode electrode, and “a housing forming an external appearance, and exposing a cathode electrode terminal connected to the cathode electrode and an anode electrode terminal connected to the anode electrode to an outside thereof.” Final Act. 3–4 (citing Kim ¶¶ 29, 31, 33, Figs. 1 and 2). The Examiner finds that Kim does not “teach wherein the cathode electrode terminal and the anode electrode terminal differ from each other in at least one of exposure direction, height, size, and shape.” Final Act. 4. The Examiner finds, however, that Sato discloses a housing, and exposing a cathode electrode terminal connected to a cathode electrode and an anode electrode terminal connected to an anode electrode to an outside of the housing. Final Act. 4 (citing Sato ¶¶ 11, 24, 25, Figs. 1a–1c). The Examiner finds that Sato discloses that the “cathode electrode terminal and the anode electrode terminal differ from each other in at least one of exposure direction, height, size, and shape.” Id. The Examiner concludes that “[i]t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the invention of Kim with the teachings of Canon [Sato] to provide retrofit Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 5 capabilities to combine electrodes differing in size, shape, or exposure direction.” Final Act. 4. On the record before us, however, the Examiner does not provide a sufficient factual basis to establish that Kim and Sato, when considered individually or in combination, disclose or would have suggested an X-ray source comprising a housing configured to expose a cathode electrode terminal connected to a cathode electrode, and an anode electrode terminal connected to an anode electrode, to an outside of the housing, for reasons expressed by Appellant and discussed below. Kim discloses an X-ray tube consisting of cathode (negative) electrode side 101, anode (positive) electrode side 102, and connecting portion 160. Kim pp. 9–11, Figs. 1 and 2. Kim discloses that cathode (negative) electrode side 101 contains cathode electrode 110 having a plurality of carbon nanotubes 110c densely arranged on its front side. Kim p. 10, Figs. 1 and 2. Kim discloses that anode (positive) electrode side 102 contains anode electrode 130 having target 130s on its bottom surface. Id. Kim discloses that connecting portion 160 allows cathode (negative) electrode side 101 and anode (positive) electrode side 102 to assemble and disassemble to facilitate installation and replacement of cathode (negative) electrode side 101. Kim pp. 6, 11, Figs. 1 and 2. Appellant argues that the Examiner does not identify any disclosure in Kim that teaches or would have suggested a cathode electrical terminal connected to cathode electrode 110, or an anode electrical terminal connected to anode electrode 130, each of which are exposed to an outside of a housing. Appeal Br. 10, 12. Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 6 The Examiner responds to Appellant’s arguments in the Answer by finding that Figures 1 and 2 of Kim show that cathode 110 and anode 130 can be coupled and decoupled via interface 160. Ans. 4. The Examiner finds that “[a] functioning X-ray tube requires the positive terminal (cathode electrode terminal) and the negative terminal (anode electrode terminal) to be in communication,” and “Kim disclose[s] an operable x-ray tube; therefore, the terminals are exposed to allow communication upon coupling.” Id. Appellant argues in the Reply Brief that the Examiner’s statements in the Answer appear to interchange battery technology with X-ray technology. Reply Br. 7–8. Appellant indicates that in a battery, an anode terminal is connected via a circuit (or wire) to a cathode terminal, and when the circuit is closed, electrons from the anode terminal move towards the cathode terminal through the circuit. Id. Appellant indicates that in a battery, therefore, “[i]t is appropriate to describe that the anode electrode is connected (in communication) with the cathode electrode.” Reply Br. 8. In contrast, Appellant argues, “[i]n an X-ray apparatus the anode electrode and the cathode electrode are not connected (communication) as it is in a battery.” Id. Rather, as Appellant’s Specification explains, “[i]n X-ray technology, electrons are field emitted from nanostructures located on a cathode electrode towards a target surface on an anode electrode based on a voltage difference between the cathode electrode and the anode electrode,” and the anode electrode and cathode electrode are connected to an anode electrode terminal and a cathode electrode terminal, respectively. Reply Br. 8 (citing Spec. ¶¶ 41, 42, 77). Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 7 Consistent with Appellant’s arguments, as discussed above, Kim discloses, and illustrates in Figures 1 and 2, that connecting portion 160 of Kim’s x-ray tube allows cathode (negative) electrode side 101 and anode (positive) electrode side 102—rather than cathode 110 and anode 130 as the Examiner asserts—to assemble and disassemble in order to facilitate installation and replacement of cathode (negative) electrode side 101. Figures 1 and 2 of Kim show that connecting portion 160 consists of two distinct parts or pieces that separate in the disassembled state and connect in the assembled state. In both the assembled and disassembled states, one of the respective parts or pieces of connecting portion 160 encloses a side of each of cathode (negative) electrode side 101 and anode (positive) electrode side 102, thereby enclosing cathode 110 in cathode (negative) electrode side 101, and enclosing anode 130 in anode (positive) electrode side 102. The Examiner does not provide any objective evidence to support the Examiner’s assertion that because Kim’s X-ray tube is operable, it necessarily includes a positive terminal (cathode electrode terminal) and a negative terminal (anode electrode terminal) that are “exposed to allow communication upon coupling.” Significantly, the Examiner does not identify any disclosure in Kim of cathode and anode electrode terminals that are exposed to an outside of a housing. The Examiner, therefore, does not provide a sufficient factual basis to establish that Kim discloses or would have suggested that an anode electrode terminal exposed to an outside of a housing assembles and disassembles at connecting portion 160 with a cathode electrode terminal exposed to an outside of a housing. Nonetheless, as discussed above, the Examiner also finds that Sato discloses exposing a cathode electrode terminal connected to a cathode Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 8 electrode and an anode electrode terminal connected to an anode electrode to an outside of a housing. Final Act. 4 (citing Sato ¶¶ 11, 24, 25, Figs. 1a–1c). We find no such disclosure in Sato, however, as Appellant argues. See Appeal Br. 11; Reply Br. 8–9. Sato discloses an X-ray tube consisting of electron gun unit 100, barrel unit 110, and target unit 120. Sato ¶¶ 16, 17, Fig. 1a. Sato discloses that electron gun unit 100 includes cathode 104, while target unit 120 includes X-ray emission target 122. Sato ¶¶ 17, 18, Fig. 1a. The Examiner does not identify with sufficient specificity any disclosure in Sato that teaches or would have suggested a cathode electrode terminal connected to a cathode electrode and an anode electrical terminal connected to an anode electrode, each of which is exposed to an outside of a housing. The Examiner, therefore, does not provide a sufficient factual basis to establish that Sato discloses or would have suggested a cathode electrical terminal connected to a cathode electrode, an anode electrical terminal connected to an anode electrode, and a housing configured to expose cathode and anode electrode terminals to an outside of the housing, as required by claims 1 and 7. We, accordingly, do not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 7, and claims 2–6 and 8–17, which each depend from either claim 1 or claim 7, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kim in view of Sato. CONCLUSION Claims Rejected 35 U.S.C. § Reference(s)/Basis Affirmed Reversed 1–17 103 Kim, Sato 1–17 Appeal 2020-001535 Application 15/301,469 9 REVERSED Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation