Valerie F. Downey, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 11, 2000
05a01097 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 11, 2000)

05a01097

10-11-2000

Valerie F. Downey, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Valerie F. Downey v. United States Postal Service

05A01097

October 11, 2000

.

Valerie F. Downey,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Request No. 05A01097

Appeal No. 01A02996

Agency No. 1F-908-0004-00

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Valerie

F. Downey v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A02996

(June 23, 2000).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

The prior decision affirmed the agency's dismissal of complainant's

complaint for raising the same claim raised in a prior complaint, and for

failing to state a claim. After a review of the complainant's request

for reconsideration, the previous decision, and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of

29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission

to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A02996

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 11, 2000

__________________

Date

FOR OFO INTERNAL CIRCULATION ONLY

Initial

Date

To: Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

To: Hilda Rodriguez, Director

Appellate Review Programs

Request Number

05A01097

Appeal Number

01A02996

Agency Number

1F-908-0004-00

Hearing Number

THE ATTACHED DECISION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Title

Name

Initial

Date

Attorney:

Doreen Kaufmann

October 4, 2000

Supervisor:

Mary Jean Moore

Division Director:

Marie Fitzgerald

Complainant(s):

Valerie F. Downey

Agency:

United States Postal Service

Decision:

Denied

Statute(s) Alleged:

Title VII, ADEA, Rehab

Basis(es) Alleged:

RW, AO, GF, NO, OA, HP, OR

Issue(s) Alleged:

A4

Where Discrimination Is Found (Only):

(A) Basis(es) for Finding:

(B) Issues in Finding:

Typist/date/diskette

DK01 / October 4, 2000

Spell Check

YES

Team Proofed

Date

05 CASE DISPOSITION SHEET

Complainant

Agency

Request No.

Cornielus G. Singletary

United States Postal Service

05A01100

Check ALL applicable codes

PROCEDURAL DECISION

No finding by OFO on allegations of discrimination or no discrimination,

or on allegations of breach of settlement agreement or lack of breach

of settlement agreement.

X 3K - Procedural Decision

MERITS DECISION

Must include finding by OFO of discrimination or no discrimination,

or of breach of settlement agreement or lack of breach of settlement

agreement on at least one issue.

? 4A - Merits Decision? 6Q - 01 decision was procedural

? 6R - 01 decision was merits? 6Q - 01 decision was procedural

? 6R - 01 decision was merits? 3L - RTR vacated / remanded ALL of

agency's merits decision

? 3M - RTR reversed / remanded agency's procedural

decision

? 6E - RTR found discrimination

List Basis codes:

List Issue codes:

? 6F - RTR found no discrimination? 6H - RTR affirmed 01 decision

? 6I - RTR reversed 01 decision

? 6J - RTR modified 01 decision (NOTE: if affirmed in

part and reversed in part, then 3M code required)

? 6M - RTR vacated 01 decision (NOTE: 01 decision MUST

be merits and ALL issues vacated)

? 6U - Reconsider on own motion? 6S - RTR found settlement breach

? 6T - RTR found no settlement breach? 6H - RTR affirmed 01 decision

? 6I - RTR reversed 01 decision

? 6J - RTR modified 01 decision

(affirmed in part, reversed in part)

? 6U - Reconsider on own motion? 4H - RTR affirmed FAD

? 4I - RTR reversed FAD

? 4J - RTR modified FAD? 4H - RTR affirmed FAD

? 4I - RTR reversed FAD

? 4J - RTR modified FAD (NOTE: if affirmed in part and

reversed in part, then 3L code required if at least one

issue is remanded)

? 3L - RTR remanded PART of agency's merits decision. If

breach is basis, use of 3L also requires 4I code.

? 3P - Adverse inference? 4Q - Compliance requiredRTR DENIED

Denials require only 3K and 6Q or 6R (above) and 6D and 6N or 6P (below),

for a total of 4 codes, and 4Q if applicable

X 6D - RTR Denied? 4N - RTR affirmed AJ

? 4O - RTR reversed AJ

? 4P - RTR modified AJ

? 4T - AJ issued Summary Judgment decision

? 4U - RTR affirmed AJ Summary Judgment

? 4V - RTR reversed AJ Summary JudgmentX 6N - Failure to meet RTR

criteria

? 6P - Other procedural defect? 3H - RTR denied attorney's fees

? 3I - RTR approved attorney's fees

? 3J - RTR modified attorney's fees

? 4Q - Compliance required on 01OTHER CLOSURE CODES

Do NOT include 3K or 4A codes

? 3C - Duplicate docket #

? 3D - Withdrawal

? 3E - Complaint settled

? 3G - Other letter closure

? 3R - Return to agency for consolidation

? 3S - Return to AJ for consolidation

? 7N - Civil action filed? 4Q - Compliance required on 01

Revised - 2/3/00Appellate Review Program Companion Case Checklist

COMPLAINANT

AGENCY

Appeal/Request/Petition No.

Cornielus G. Singletary

United States Postal Service

05A01100

OPEN

CASES (#)

ORADS

STATUS

RELATED

(YES/NO)

ACTIONS

TAKEN

CLOSED

CASES (#)

ORADS

STATUS

RELATED

(YES/NO)

ACTIONS

TAKEN

______________________ _______________

ATTORNEY DATE

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.