05990478
03-15-2000
Ute Baker, Complainant, Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.
Ute Baker v. Department of the Treasury
05990478
March 15, 2000
Ute Baker, )
Complainant, )
) Request No. 05990478
) Appeal No. 01982352
) Agency No. 98-4040
Lawrence H. Summers, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Treasury, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
On March 15, 1999, Ute Baker (complainant) initiated a request to
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to reconsider the
decision in Baker v. Dept. of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 01982352
(February 12, 1999).<1> EEOC regulations provide that the Commissioners
may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous decision where the party
demonstrates that: (1) the previous decision involved clearly erroneous
interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the decision will have a
substantial impact on the policies, practices or operation of the agency.
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405(b)). Complainant's request is denied.
After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous
decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds complainant's
request does not meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.405(b), and it
is the decision of the Commission to deny complainant's request. The
decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01982352 remains the Commission's final
decision in this matter. There is no further right of administrative
appeal from a decision of the Commission on a request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P1199)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive
this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT
IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
March 15, 2000
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify
that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
_______________________
Date
1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.