United Cities Gas Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 19, 1958119 N.L.R.B. 1665 (N.L.R.B. 1958) Copy Citation SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 1665 Act • all production and maintenance employees at the Employer's Memphis, Tennessee, plant, excluding office clerical employees, pro- fessional and technical employees, watchmen, guards, and supervisors, as defined in the Act. [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.] MEMBEiis RoDGEIis and FANNING took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Southeastern Illinois Gas Co. Division of United Cities Gas Co. and Metrogas, Inc. and United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 551, AFL-CIO, Petitioner. Cases Nos. 14-RC-32I and 14-RC-3257. February 19, 1958 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION, ORDER, AND DIRECTION OF SECOND ELECTION On November 25, 1957, the Board issued its Decision and Direction of Election herein,' placing only the Petitioner on the ballot.' The Petitioner had petitioned only for the Employer's service employees, but upon the request of the Employer, and in accordance with Board policy, the Board included construction employees or laborers in an "all physical" employees unit. On December 13, 1957, International Hod Carriers', Building and. Common Laborers' Union of America, AFL-CIO, herein called the Hod Carriers, requested a place on the ballot in the election which was scheduled for December 17, 1957, requested a postponement of the election to give the employees notice of its intervention, and in support thereof submitted a showing of interest in the form of author- ization and membership cards to support its requested intervention. However, pending, an investigation of the Hod Carriers' showing of interest and the compliance .status of its interested locals, the sched- uled election was held as scheduled and the ballots were impounded. It now appears that : (1) Some of the construction employees or laborers are members of 3 Hod Carriers' locals; (2) the Hod Carriers was not aware of this proceeding prior to December 13, 1957, but as soon as it did become aware of this proceeding and the inclusion in the unit of the construction employees or laborers it filed its request for intervention and submitted its showing of interest; (3) its showing of interest is timely and,adequate to support its requested mterven-- ' Not reported in punted volumes of Board Decisions and Orders 2 The Petitioner was then the only labor organization- involved in this proceeding 119 NLRB No 206 476321-58-vol 119----106 1666 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD tion; and (4) upon notice of the lapsed compliance with the filing requirements of the Act of one of its interested locals, it thereafter expeditiously effected a renewal of such lapsed compliance within a reasonable time of 2 weeks. In all of the circumstances , we are of the opinion that the Hod Carriers is entitled to the requested intervention . Accordingly, we shall set aside the election , and direct a second election placing the Hod Carriers on the ballot in such election. [The Board set aside the election held herein on December 17, 1957, and ordered the ballots cast therein destroyed.] [Text of Direction of Second Election omitted from publication.] MEMBERS BEAN and FANNING took no part in the consideration of the above Supplemental Decision , Order, and Direction of Second Election. Ovaiwood Dish Corporation and United Brotherhood of Carpen- ters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, Petitioner. Case No. 3-RC-1836. February 19, 1958 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION, ORDER, AND DIRECTION OF SECOND ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held in this case as the result of which the Board,.on August 5, 1957, issued a Decision and Order in which it remanded the case for further hearing on the issues; and excluded A. H. Saul, the Petitioner's representative, from further participation in the proceeding because of his misconduct at the hearing.' After the further hearing, the Board issued a Supplemental Decision and Direction of Election on October 11, 1957.2 Thereafter, an election by secret :ballot was conducted- under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Third Region in the unit found appropriate by the Board. A tally of ballots was issued to the parties which shows that -of the 1.74 votes :cast, 86 were for the Petitioner, 81 against, and 7. ballots were challenged. There were no void ballots. The Employer timely filed six objections to the election. ' Since the challenges were sufficient in number to affect the results of the election, the Regional Director investigated the challenged ballots' and the, ob- jections and, on December 20, 1957, issued his consolidated- report on objections and. challenges . He recommended that 6 of the challenges i 118 NLRB 947. 2 Not reported in printed. volumes of Board Decisions and Orders. 119 NLRB No. 205. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation