Union Tanning Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsAug 10, 194026 N.L.R.B. 484 (N.L.R.B. 1940) Copy Citation .1 i 'In the Matter of UNION TANNING COMPANY and UNION TANNING COMPANY-EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION ,Case No. R-1954,.-Decided August 10, 19110 Jurisdiction : tanning industry. Investigation , and Certification of Representatives : existence of question where employer refuses to,accord recognition to union; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : production and maintenance em- ployees on' an Hourly basis excluding supervisory and clerical employees. '.Pitney, Flardin• cf; 'Skinner, by Mr. Wittiam J. Brennen, Jr., of Newark, N. J., 'for the' Company.' . ' 1 Mr.t J. N. Seymour, 'Of Salamanca, N. Y., for the Association. Mr. Rudolph. F. Klancer,' of Gowancia, N. Y., for' the International. Mr! Louis.Cokin, of counsel' to the Board DECISION 'AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION 1: STATEMENT OF THE 'CASE On May 22, 1940, Union Tanning Company Employees' Associa- tion, herein called the Association, filed with the Regional Director for the Third Region (Buffalo, New York) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representa- tion of employees of Union Tanning Company, Salamanca, New York, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On July 6, 1940, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations- Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On July 10, 1940, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the Association, and upon International Fur & Leather Workers Union of United States and Canada, herein called the International, a tabor organiza- tion claiming to represent employees directly affected by the investi- 26 N. L. R. B, No. 45 484 UNION TANNING COMPANY 485 gation. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on July 20, 1940, at Salamanca, New York, before Edward D. Flaherty, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The Company and the Association were represented by counsel, the International by its representative, and all participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. The Trial Examiner granted a motion to intervene filed by the International. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on other motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed all the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. These rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Union Tanning Company, a New Jersey corporation, operates a tannery at Salamanca,, New York, where it is engaged in the tanning of hides. The Company tans hides on contract for other companies. The cost of hides shipped to it for'the period from November 1, 1939, to June 30, 1940, was approximately $550,000: During this same period the gross market value of the finished leather produced by the Company was valued at approximately $850,000. Approximately all of the raw materials shipped to the Company are shipped from points outside the State of New York and, approximately all of the finished leather is shipped by the Company to points outside the State of New York. The Company employs approximately 147 employees at its Salamanca tannery. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Union Tanning Company Employees' Association is an unaffiliated labor organization, admitting to membership all production and main- tenance employees of the Company, excluding supervisory and clerical employees. International Fur & Leather Workers Union-of United States and Canada is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Indus- trial Organizations. It admits to membership all production, and maintenance employees of the Company, excluding supervisory and clerical employees. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On May 4, 1940, the Association, claiming to represent a majority of the Company's employees , asked the Company for a conference for 323429-42-vol. 26--32 486 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the purpose of collective bargaining. On May 6, 1940 , the Company replied by letter that it would be willing to bargain with the Associa- tion if it could prove that it represented a majority of the employees. At the hearing a report of the Regional Director concerning the representation claims of the Association and the International was introduced into evidence . The report , based on a copy of the Associa- tion's bylaws and constitution signed by employees and the Inter- national's signed membership application cards, all of which were submitted to the Regional Director, shows that both the Association and the International are the authorized representatives of a sub- stantial number of the employees of the Company. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, Sand substantial rela- tion to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Association, the International, and the Company agreed at the hearing that the appropriate unit should consist of all production and maintenance employees on an hourly basis, excluding supervisory and clerical employees. The only controversy concerning the unit con= cerns Chester Wymar and Joseph Wodarek. The Association and the Company urge the inclusion of these two employees and the Inter- national desires their exclusion. Chester Wymar is employed in the shipping department of the Company, where he is engaged in the loading of freight cars and piling of stock. He works with another employee and although he shows the other employee where to pile the various materials, he has no authority to recommend the hiring or discharging of this employee. We find that Wymar should be included in the unit. Joseph Wodarek is classified by the Company as a repairman. His duties take him to all parts of the tannery and in addition to his regular duties he administers first aid to other employees when necessary. He has no supervisory duties whatsoever and he is in close contact with the production workers. We find that Wodarek should be in- cluded in the unit. We find that all production and maintenance employees on an hourly basis, excluding supervisory and clerical employees, constitute a unit UNION TANNING COMPANY 487 appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining and that said unit will insure to the employees of the Company their full right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question which has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of the Company can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot . The Company , the Association , and the International agreed at the hearing that all the employees of the Company whose names appear on the July 15, 1940, pay roll should be eligible to vote in the election . We shall direct that the employees of the Company eligible to vote in the election shall be those in the appropriate unit whose names appear on the pay roll of July 15, 1940, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation and employees who were then or have since been temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or have been discharged for cause. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case , the Board makes the following: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Union Tanning Company, Salamanca, New York, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. All production and maintenance employees on an hourly basis, excluding supervisory and clerical employees, constitute a unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining , within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act , and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Union Tanning Company, Salamanca, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Third Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and 488 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOAR subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all the production and maintenance employees on an hourly basis whose names appear on the Company's pay roll of July 15, 1940, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were, ill or on vacation and employees who were then or have since been temporarily laid off, but excluding supervisory and .clerical employees and employees who have since quit or been dis- charged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Union Tanning Company Employees' Association, or by Inter- national Fur. & Leather Workers Union of United States and Canada, affiliated with the -Congress of Industrial Organizations, for the -purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. ,MR. EDWIN S. SMITH took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation