Tricia B.,1 Complainant,v.Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Feb 9, 2016

0520160005 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 9, 2016)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013

Tricia B.,1
Complainant,

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
Agency.

Request No. 0520160005
Appeal No. 0120151680
Agency No. 1B061002115

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in EEOC Appeal No.
0120151680 (August 20, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its
discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the
requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous
interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial
impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c).
In her underlying complaint, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected her to unlawful
discrimination on the bases of her race/national origin (Hispanic Dominican) when: (1) in
November 2014, a threatening letter in another employee's locker was reported and she was
among those chosen to be interviewed as part of the investigation into the threat; and (2) on an
unspecified date, her request for a copy of the investigation that was conducted was denied. In
its final decision, the Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §
1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. On appeal, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s
dismissal, finding that Complainant failed to show that she suffered a harm or loss with respect
to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.

In her request for reconsideration, Complainant fails to address the factual and legal issues
discussed in the appellate decision. We find that Complainant’s arguments do not demonstrate

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name
when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.
0520160005

2
that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law or
will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Accordingly, we find that Complainant has failed to demonstrate that the Commission should
reconsider its appellate decision.

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the
request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the
Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120151680 remains the
Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of
the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal
from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate
United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive
this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the
person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or
her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in
court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office,
facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may
request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or
costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may
request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of
court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court
has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the
time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File
a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations

February 9, 2016
Date