Timothy P. Gill, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 9, 2009
0120090765 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 9, 2009)

0120090765

07-09-2009

Timothy P. Gill, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Timothy P. Gill,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120090765

Agency No. 4E680005908

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated October 29, 2008, dismissing his complaint

of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In his complaint,

complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases

of physical disability (kidney, ankles, and shoulder) and age (58) when:

1. On May 16, 2008 he was required to obtain medical documentation for

FMLA purposes;

2. On June 23, 2008, the agency attempted to force him to take FMLA for

the end of the tour;

3. On August 1, 2008, complainant's supervisor harassed complainant and

4. On October 6, 2008, complainant was told to provide a doctor's

statement.

The agency dismissed the instant complaint as untimely on the grounds

that complainant failed to contact an EEO Counselor in a timely manner.

Specifically, the agency determined that complainant's counselor

contact on July 10, 2008 regarding the events described in claims 1-4

was untimely. Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's

dismissal of claim 1 as untimely was proper. However, we find that

claims 2, 3 and 4 are more properly analyzed to determine whether or

not they state a claim.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event described in

clam 1 occurred on May 16, 2008, but complainant did not initiate contact

with an EEO Counselor until July 10, 2008, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1)

requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the

attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five

(45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or,

in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the

effective date of the action. The Commission has adopted a "reasonable

suspicion" standard (as opposed to a "supportive facts" standard) to

determine when the forty-five (45) day limitation period is triggered.

See Howard v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February

11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation is not triggered until a complainant

reasonably suspects discrimination, but before all the facts that support

a charge of discrimination have become apparent.

EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend

the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the

time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know

and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or

personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented

by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within

the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency

or the Commission.

On appeal, complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence

warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor

contact regarding claim 1.

Turning now to claims 2, 3, and 4, the Commission determines that

complainant has failed to state a claim of discrimination. Specifically,

the Commission finds that in claim 2, complainant alleged that the agency

"attempted to force him to take FMLA." However, complainant fails to

point to any specific adverse action taken by the agency. Similarly

regarding claims 3 and 4, complainant has failed to demonstrate how

the agency's conduct in asking complainant to provide a doctor's note

affected a term, condition or privilege of employment. In addition,

complainant has failed to describe any specific harassment by his

supervisor occurring on August 1, 2008. Upon review, the Commission

finds that with respect to claims 2, 3, and 4, complainant has failed

to demonstrate that he suffered any harm to the terms or conditions of

his employment. Moreover, complainant has failed to demonstrate that

he was subjected to harassment so severe or pervasive that it altered

the conditions of his employment with the agency.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed for the reasons set forth herein.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 9, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120090765

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120090765