Tide Water Associated Oil Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJan 31, 194238 N.L.R.B. 889 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of TIDE WATER ASSOCIATED OIL COMPANY and MARINE DIVISION , COMMERCIAL TELEGRAPHERS UNION, A. F. OF L. , Case No. R-3386.-Decided January 31,,1942 Jurisdiction : petroleum , production , refining, and marketing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives :' existence , of question: •re- fusal to accord union recognition until certified by the Board : election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all radio operators on the Com-, pany's • vessels operated by the Marine Department of, its Eastern Division, New York City. , Mr. Mathew F. McCue, of New York'City, for the Company. Ornstein'& Silverman, by Mr. Henry'H. Silverman, of New York City,'and Mr:-Fred M. Howe, of New York City; for the C. T. U. ' Boudin, Cohn ct; Gliclcstein,.by Mr. Irving Robert Feinberg, of New York City, and Mr. Wayne P. Paschal, of New York City, for the A. C. A. Mr. Thomas B. Sweeney, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION , STATEMENT OF THE CASE On July 1, 1941, Marine Division, Commercial Telegraphers" Union, A. F. of L., herein called the C. T. U., filed with the Regional Director for the Second Region (New York City) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Tide Water Associated Oil' Company, Eastern Division, New York City, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of , the'National Labor RelationsAct, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On, October 11, 1941, the: National, Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant,to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section,3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to, provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On October 16, 1941,' the' Regional' Director' issued a"notice of hear- ing, and on November 5, 19, and 28, 1941, notices of postponement .of •38 N. L. R. B., No . . 156.. 890 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD hearing, copies of all of which were duly served upon the Company, the C. T. U., and the Marine Department, American Communications Association, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called the A. C. A., a labor organization claiming to represent employees directly affected by the investigation. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on December 10, 1941, at New York City, before Drexel A. Sprecher, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Company, the C. T. U., and the A. C. A. were represented and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing, the Trial Examiner made several rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Company is a Delaware corporation, engaged in the production, refining, marketing, and transportation of petroleum and petroleum products. Through the Marine Department of its Eastern Division (New York City), the Company operates a fleet of vessels for the purpose of transporting its products from the States of Texas and Louisiana to ports in New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Maine. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. We find that the Company is engaged in trade, traffic, transporta- tion, and commerce among the several States, and that its employees on the Company's vessels are directly engaged in such trade, traffic, transportation, and commerce. H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Marine Division, Commercial Telegraphers Union, is a labor organ- ization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. Marine Department, American Communications Association, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organ- izations, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company refuses to recognize the C. T. U. as the exclusive rep- resentative of the employees in the unit hereinafter found to be TIDE WATER ASSOCIATED OIL COMPANY 891 appropriate unless and until it is certified as such representative by the Board. The A. C. A. contends that a collective ' bargaining agreement it entered into with the Company on December 1, 1938,1 as automatically renewed under its terms, constitutes a bar to a present determination of representatives. This agreement, in so far as material, provides that it "shall continue until April 1, 1940, and thereafter this agree- ment shall continue from year to year unless written notice to ter- minate or modify the agreement is filed by either party thirty days prior to the expiration date of any one year." The Company maintains that by notice dated February 28, 1940, it terminated the afore-mentioned agreement at its expiration date in accordance with its terms. The Company claimed that the notice of termination, a copy of which was received in evidence at the hear- ing, was addressed and mailed to American Radio Telegraphists Association, Local No. 2, attention Mr. Fred M. Howe, Secretary, at its office, 10 Bridge Street, New York City. The Company con- tends that it did not meet with the A. C. A. or observe any of the requirements of the agreement after such notice of termination. The A. C. A. denies that it ever received notice of termination and argues that the agreement was automatically renewed for a 1-year.term in 1940 and again in 1941, and will remain in force until April 2, 1942. The A. C. A. maintains that it had several telephone con- versations with a representative of the Company after February 18, 1940. It admits, however, that it had not met or otherwise com- municated with the Company. We are of the opinion that the contract should not constitute a bar to a determination of representatives. It appears from a statement of the Regional Director that the C. T. U. and the A. C. A. each represent a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.' We find that a question has arisen concerning the representatives of employees of the Company, and that such question tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. ' This contract , a copy of which was introduced into evidence at the hearing, was executed by and between the Company and American Radio Telegraphists Association, Local No. 2 . The record , however, reveals that the American Radio Telegraphists Asso- ciation, Local No. 2, changed its name by a vote of its membership in 1939 to the A. C. A. I The Regional Director in a statement prepared by him and introduced in evidence at the hearing states that the C. T. U. submitted dues payment records and authorization cards bearing apparently genuine signatures of 12 of the employees in the alleged appro- priate unit , which consists of 13 employees . Nine of the apparently genuine signatures are of employees whose names appear on the Company 's pay roll of August 1,_1941.- He also reported that A. C. A. submitted 16 authorization cards, 5 of which contain apparently genuine original signatures of employees whose , names appear on the Company 's pay roll of August 1, 1941. 892 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL ' LABOR RELATIONS' BOARD IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Company, .the C. T. U., and the A. C. A. have agreed and, we find that all radio,. operators employed on the Company' s vessels operated by the Marine Department of its Eastern Division, New York City, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of col- lective bargaining. We further find that said unit will insure to the employees of, the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and, to collective bargaining and otherwise will effectuate the policies of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question which has arisen concerning representa- tion can best be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot. The Company and the C. T. U. agree that all radio operators em- ployed on the vessels at the time the notice of election is posted shall be, eligible to vote. The A. C. A. contends that eligibility should be based on the pay rolls 3' of the Company at the date of the hearing. In accordance with. our usual practice, we shall direct that those eligible to vote in the election shall be the employees in the' appro- priate unit who were employed by the Company during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the additions and limitations set forth in the Direction. We shall direct that the election be held as promptly as is prac- ticable after the date of this Direction under the direction and super- vision of, the Regional Director for the Second, Region, who shall determine in her discretion the exact time, place, and procedure, for posting notices of election and for balloting on the vessel, provided, however, that each vessel be posted with a notice of election, a sample ballot, a list of employees eligible to vote, and a notice of time and place when balloting will be conducted, at least 48 hours in advance ,of said balloting. • Upon the basis of the above findings of fact ,and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : , , . , CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A' question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the rep- resentation of employees of the Tide Water Associated' Oil Com- pany, Eastern Division , New York City, within the meaning of Sec- tion 9 ( c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 8 The Company explained at the hearing that it had no general pay roll for all its employees, but that there were "separate ' ship's pay rolls " TIDE WATER ASSOCIATED OIL COMPANY 893 2. All radio operators employed on the Company's vessels operated by the Marine Department of its Eastern Division , New York City, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. . . DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board, by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat. 449,, and 'pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DumcrED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with the Company, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as soon as convenient, and beginning as promptly as is practicable after the date of this Direction, in conformity with the rules set forth, in Section V abovefor the conduct of such election, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section '9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all radio operators employed on vessels operated by the Marine, Department of the Eastern Division of the Company, during. the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Election, including employees who did not work during said pay- roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active mili- tary service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding those who have since quit 'or been discharged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Marine Division, Commercial Telegraphers Union, A. F. of L., by Marine' Division, American Communications Association, C. I. O. for the ,purposes of collective bargaining or by neither. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation