Thomasina B.,1 Complainant,v.Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 10, 2016
0120162480 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 10, 2016)

0120162480

11-10-2016

Thomasina B.,1 Complainant, v. Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Thomasina B.,1

Complainant,

v.

Robert McDonald,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120162480

Agency No. 200I-0516-2016102804

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final Agency decision (FAD) dated June 21, 2016, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Clinical Pharmacist at the Agency's C.W. Young Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Applied Health Services Pharmacy Service in Bay Pines, Florida.

On April 27, 2016, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency discriminated against her based on reprisal for prior protected equal employment opportunity (EEO) activity under Title VII and the ADEA when on February 16, 2016, February 18, 2016, and February 19, 2016, it denied her official time to attend the depositions of management officials in her civil action EEO court case.2 Instead, she used annual leave.

The Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. It reasoned that a complaint regarding the denial of official time does not state a claim, rather it regards a violation of Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), (Revised Aug. 5, 2015) and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605, and the Commission has the authority to remedy a violation of its official time regulation without an EEO complaint being filed and investigated.

On appeal, Complainant argues that her right to attend the depositions in pay status, administrative leave, or court leave for her civil action is protected by EEO law outside EEO MD-110. She argues that Agency supervisors were granted administrative or court leave to attend depositions.

In opposition to the appeal, the Agency argues that there is no evidence that Agency supervisors were granted leave to attend depositions other than their own and that the FAD should be affirmed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission has a policy of considering reprisal claims with a broad view of coverage. See Carroll v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05970939 (April 4, 2000). Under Commission policy, claimed retaliatory actions which can be challenged are not restricted to those which affect a term or condition of employment. Rather, a complainant is protected from any discrimination that is reasonably likely to deter protected activity. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 5-19 (Revised Aug. 5, 2015); Carroll.

While we agree with the Agency's position regarding official time in the administrative EEO complaint process, the official time language in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605 and EEO MD-110 only apply to the EEO administrative process governed by 29 C.F.R. Part 1614, not to civil action proceedings in courts.

Accordingly, we view this case like any other where a Complainant alleges reprisal regarding the denial of being in pay status or denial of requested leave. In this case we find that this would reasonably likely deter EEO activity. Accordingly, the FAD is REVERSED.

ORDER (E1016)3

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision was issued. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision was issued, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0416)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The requests may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The

court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 10, 2016

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

2 Relying on the counselor's report, the Agency incorrectly did not include the February 18, 2016, date in its definition of the complaint.

3 While the Agency used the term "official time" in the definition of the complaint, we find that it should not be viewed as a term of art. Instead, Complainant means not being in pay status or granted some type of paid leave that is not charged against her sick or annual leave balance, like court leave or administrative leave.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120162480

2

0120162480