01A12652_r
06-15-2001
Thomas R. Hooker, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Thomas R. Hooker v. United States Postal Service
01A12652
June 15, 2001
.
Thomas R. Hooker,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A12652
Agency No. 1-H-337-0006-01
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the complaint was properly
dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO
Counselor contact. By notice of removal dated February 2, 2000,
complainant was informed that he would be removed effective March
10, 2000, because he had failed to develop a 95% proficiency rating.
On March 6, 2000, complainant filed a grievance concerning his removal
for scheme failure. In the grievance, complainant claimed, inter alia,
that the agency had failed to comply with disability regulations when he
continued his training although his condition required that he take time
off . By decision issued on March 14, 2000, the grievance was denied
because it was determined that complainant had been given ample time to
throw his zone.
On December 15, 2000, complainant sought EEO counseling claiming that
he had been discriminated against on the bases of sex and age when
on November 2, 2000, he became aware that a female co-worker passed an
assigned zone position after she had been issued a notice of removal.
Complainant further claimed that while he was terminated, the female
co-worker was afforded an extra month to improve her proficiency in the
zone. Subsequently, complainant filed a formal complaint raising this
issue. The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint on the
grounds of untimely EEO Counselor contact, after finding that complainant
should have suspected discrimination when he was removed in March 2000.
A review of the grievance shows that complainant did not raise
discrimination on the bases of sex or age as part of his claim; however,
in his grievance, he did allege discrimination based on disability.
When complainant sought EEO counseling, he claimed that when he was
removed on March 10, 2000, he did not realize he had been discriminated
against until he became aware on November 2, 2000, that a female co-worker
had been treated differently when she was afforded an extra month to
improve her proficiency in the zone. We find that a fair reading of the
record, specifically the grievance, shows that complainant's argument
that he was unaware of discrimination until November 2, 2000, is not
sufficiently persuasive to warrant an extension of the time limit for
initiating EEO Counselor contact. Accordingly, the agency's final
decision dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0900)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 15, 2001
__________________
Date