Thomas M. Long, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Western Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 21, 2011
0120100374 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 21, 2011)

0120100374

04-21-2011

Thomas M. Long, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Western Area), Agency.


Thomas M. Long,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Western Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120100374

Agency No. 1E501023909

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

Agency's decision dated October 5, 2009, concerning his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

for the Agency in a postal facility in Des Moines, Iowa.

On September 16, 2009, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that

the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of disability

when his FMLA information in eRMS contained medical information and was

available for view by individuals without the legal authority to view

such information.

In its final decision, the Agency stated that the Complainant's complaint

was being held in abeyance pending the outcome of a certification

decision in a class complaint. Specifically, the agency determined

that the claim raised in complainant's complaint was identical to

the claim raised in Diana Pevoteaux v. United States Postal Service

(Agency No. 1E-502-0054-09). The proposed class complaint alleges that

the Agency discriminated against class members when medical information

was posted in the eRMS and made available to all personnel with access

to the system in violation of the Rehabilitation Act.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission has previously held that a complainant may appeal an

agency decision to hold an individual complaint in abeyance during the

processing of a related class complaint. See Roos v. United States Postal

Service, EEOC Request No. 05920101 (February 13, 1992). In addition, Equal

Employment Opportunity Management Directive-110, Chapter 8, � III(C)

(November 9, 1999) provides, in relevant part, that "an individual

complaint that is filed before or after the class complaint is filed

and that comes within the definition of the class claim(s), will not be

dismissed but will be subsumed within the class complaint."

Upon review, we find that the Agency correctly held Complainant's claim of

disability discrimination in abeyance. As noted above, both complainant's

complaint and the proposed class allege disability discrimination when

medical information was posted and made available to all personnel with

access to the agency system.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to hold complainant's claim of

disability discrimination in abeyance is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 21, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120100374

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120100374