Theodore McGary, Complainant, Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 26, 2000
05a00176 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 26, 2000)

05a00176

04-26-2000

Theodore McGary, Complainant, Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Theodore McGary v. Department of the Army

05A00176

April 26, 2000

Theodore McGary, )

Complainant, ) Request No. 05A00176

) Appeal No. 01991658

) Agency No. AQWFDF091010320

)

Louis Caldera, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Army, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission to reconsider its decision in Theodore McGary v. Army, EEOC

Appeal No. 01991658 (September 9, 1999).<1> EEOC Regulations provide

that the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1)

the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and

hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b)).

After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it

is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in

EEOC Appeal No. 01991658 remains final. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0400)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 26, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

FOR OFO INTERNAL CIRCULATION ONLY

Initial

Date

To: Carlton M. Hadden

Acting Director, Office of Federal Operations

To: Hilda Rodriguez

Request Number 05A00176

Appeal Number 01991658

Agency Number AQWFDF091010320

Hearing Number

THE ATTACHED DECISION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Title

Name

Initial

Date

Attorney: Oscar M. Holloway, II

April 24, 2000

Supervisor: Mary Jean Moore

Division Director: Marie Fitzgerald

Complainant(s): Theodore McGary

Agency: Army

Decision: Denied

Statute(s) Alleged: Title VII

Basis(es) Alleged: RB, OR

Issue(s) Alleged: C2

Where Discrimination Is Found (Only):

(A) Basis(es) for Finding:

(B) Issues in Finding:

Typist/date/diskette

oh0/April 24, 2000/p:x folder

Spell Check YES

Team Proofed

Date

05 CASE DISPOSITION SHEET

Complainant

Agency

Request No.

Theodore McGary

Army

05A00176

Check ALL applicable codes

PROCEDURAL DECISION

No finding by OFO on allegations of discrimination or no discrimination,

or on allegations of breach of settlement agreement or lack of breach

of settlement agreement.

X 3K - Procedural Decision

MERITS DECISION

Must include finding by OFO of discrimination or no discrimination,

or of breach of settlement agreement or lack of breach of settlement

agreement on at least one issue.

? 4A - Merits Decision

? 6Q - 01 decision was procedural

? 6R - 01 decision was merits

? 6Q - 01 decision was procedural

? 6R - 01 decision was merits

? 3L - RTR vacated / remanded ALL of agency's merits decision

? 3M - RTR reversed / remanded agency's procedural decision

? 6E - RTR found discrimination

List Basis codes:

List Issue codes:

? 6F - RTR found no discrimination

? 6H - RTR affirmed 01 decision

? 6I - RTR reversed 01 decision

? 6J - RTR modified 01 decision (NOTE: if affirmed in part and reversed

in part, then 3M code required)

? 6M - RTR vacated 01 decision (NOTE: 01 decision MUST be merits and

ALL issues vacated)

? 6U - Reconsider on own motion

? 6S - RTR found settlement breach

? 6T - RTR found no settlement breach

? 6H - RTR affirmed 01 decision

? 6I - RTR reversed 01 decision

? 6J - RTR modified 01 decision (affirmed in part, reversed in part)

? 6U - Reconsider on own motion

? 4H - RTR affirmed FAD

? 4I - RTR reversed FAD

? 4J - RTR modified FAD

? 4H - RTR affirmed FAD

? 4I - RTR reversed FAD

? 4J - RTR modified FAD (NOTE: if affirmed in part and reversed in part,

then 3L code required if at least one issue is remanded)

? 3L - RTR remanded PART of agency's merits decision. If breach is

basis, use of 3L also requires 4I code.

? 3P - Adverse inference

? 4Q - Compliance required

RTR DENIED

Denials require only 3K and 6Q or 6R (above) and 6D and 6N or 6P (below),

for a total of 4 codes, and 4Q if applicable

X 6D - RTR Denied

? 4N - RTR affirmed AJ

? 4O - RTR reversed AJ

? 4P - RTR modified AJ

? 4T - AJ issued Summary Judgment decision

? 4U - RTR affirmed AJ Summary Judgment

? 4V - RTR reversed AJ Summary Judgment

X 6N - Failure to meet RTR criteria

? 6P - Other procedural defect

? 3H - RTR denied attorney's fees

? 3I - RTR approved attorney's fees

? 3J - RTR modified attorney's fees

? 4Q - Compliance required on 01

OTHER CLOSURE CODES

Do NOT include 3K or 4A codes

? 3C - Duplicate docket #

? 3D - Withdrawal

? 3E - Complaint settled

? 3G - Other letter closure

? 3R - Return to agency for consolidation

? 3S - Return to AJ for consolidation

? 7N - Civil action filed

? 4Q - Compliance required on 01

Revised - 2/3/00

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.