The Union News Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 7, 1958121 N.L.R.B. 13 (N.L.R.B. 1958) Copy Citation THE UNION NEWS COMPANY 13 mixing through dumping, mixers or spongers of bread, rolls, cakes, or pies, oven men or drawers, benchhands , underhand on cakes , bread, rolls, or pies , and jobbers and apprentices on bread, rolls , cakes, or pies. These units conformed to the contractual units which came under the jurisdiction of Local 218 , and are the units sought by the Petitioner herein. In those cases , the employers and Local 218 and Local 218A contended that the appropriate units should consist of the foregoing employees as well as the employees in the contractual units which came under the jurisdiction of Local 218A . The same contention is made by these parties in the instant cases. In its decision in the earlier cases, the Board found that the duties and interests of the employees in the units sought by the Petitioner were separate and distinct from those of the employees whom the employers and Locals 218 and 218A would have included and, there- fore, were appropriate . In view of the parties ' stipulation herein, and the Board 's decision in Cases Nos. 17-RC-2686 and 17-RC-2688, we find that the units sought by the Petitioner herein are appropriate. Accordingly , we find that the following employees of The Great Atlantic and Pacific Company, National Bakery Division, and of Fairfax Baking Company, Division of Safeway Stores , Inc., located in Kansas City, Missouri , constitute units appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act: All employees engaged in operations of mixing through dumping, mixers or spongers of bread, rolls , cakes, or pies , oven men or drawers, benchhands , underhand on cakes, bread , rolls , or pies , and jobbers and apprentices on bread, rolls, cakes, or pies, but excluding wrapping machine operators , ingredient scalers , icing makers or fruit cooks, head checkers , receiving and shipping clerks, stationary engineers, machinists , bread salesmen , office clerical employees , professional em- ployees, guards , and all supervisors as defined in the Act. [Text of Direction of Elections omitted from publication.] The Union News Company 1 and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 94, AFL-CIO, Petitioner. Case No. 2-RC-965. July 7,1958 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before John J. Carmody, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. 1 The name of the Employer appears as corrected at the hearing. 121 NLRB No. 4. 14 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Pursuant to the provisions of -Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three- member panel [Chairman Leedom and Members Bean and Jenkins]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds: 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organizations 2 involved claim to represent employees of the Employer. 3. No question, affecting commerce exists concerning the represen- tation of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, for the following reasons: Local 1115-C, Amusement Clerks & Concessionaires Employees Union, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO,3 the Intervenor herein, moves to dismiss the petition, asserting that a current collective-bargaining agreement between the Employer and the Intervenor constitutes a bar to the petition. The Petitioner apparently contends that the contract cannot be a bar because it con- tains a union-security clause and the Intervenor was not in compli- ance with Section 9 (f), (g), and (h) of the Act on the date of its execution. The Employer ,takes no position in this regard. The contract was executed on January 11, 1958, and will terminate January 11, 1961, unless automatically renewed in accordance with its provisions. The petition herein was filed on January 14, 1958. Neither on the face of the petition nor at the hearing did the Peti- tioner indicate that a claim for recognition had been communicated to the Employer prior to the filing of the petition. We have been advised administratively that the Intervenor was not in compliance with Section 9 (f), (g), and (h) of the Act between December 18, 1957, and March 8, 1958, including the intervening date of January 14, 1958, when the petition was filed. However, on March 19, 1957, the Intervenor received notice' from the Board of its com- pliance with Section 9 (f), (g), and (h). Insofar as it is pertinent, Section 8 (a) (3) of the Act provides: ... That nothing in this Act . . . shall preclude an employer from making an agreement with a labor organization . . . to require as a condition of employment membership therein .. . (i) if such labor organization is the representative of the em- ployees . . . and has at the time the agreement was made or within the preceding twelve months received from the Board a 2 The Intervenor, Local 1115-C, Amusement Clerks & Concessionaires Employees Union, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, intervened on the basis of its contract interest. , 3 The name of the Intervenor appears as corrected at the hearing THE EVANS PIPE COMPANY 15 notice of compliance with section 9 (f), (g), (h).... [Emphasis supplied.] We find that as the Intervenor received notice of compliance with Section 9 (f), (g), and (h) of the Act within 12 months prior to the time the contract herein was made, the union-security clause is lawful and the contract is a bar to the untimely petition . Accordingly, we grant the •Intervenor 's motion and shall dismiss the petition. [The Board dismissed the petition.] The Evans Pipe Company; Stillwater Clay Products Company; Robinson Clay Product Company, Factory #6; 1 Clay City Sewer Pipe Company; 1 Larson Clay Products Company; Rob- inson Clay Product Company; 1 McClain Firebrick Division of H. K. Porter Company, Inc ; 1 Universal Sewer Pipe Corpo- ration , Plant No. 1 ; 1 Universal Sewer Pipe Corporation; Den- nison Sewer Pipe Company ; 1 Universal Sewer Pipe Corpora- tion, Plant No . 2 and Plant No. 51 and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 821, AFL-CIO, Petitioner. Cases Nos. 8-RC-3177, 8-RC-3178, 8-RC-3179, 8-RC-3180, 8-RC- 3181, 8-110-39204, 8-R0-39206, 8-RC-3210, 8-R039211,2 8-RC-3212, and 8-RC-3217. July 8,1958 DECISION AND ORDER Upon separate petitions duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the Na- tional Labor Relations Act, consolidated hearings were held before Carroll L. Martin, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearings are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Rodgers, Bean, and Fanning]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds: 1. The Employers are engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organizations involved claim to represent certain em- ployees of the Employers. 3. No question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employers within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, for the following reasons: " The Petitioner seeks to represent the boilerroom firemen of the vari- ous Employers in separate units; alternatively, it will accept a multi- i The name of this Employer appears as amended at the hearing. 2 On Petitioner 's motion , this petition was withdrawn at the hearing. 121 NLRB No. 5. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation