The Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins CountyDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 6, 1967167 N.L.R.B. 691 (N.L.R.B. 1967) Copy Citation NATURAL GAS UTILITY DIST. OF HAWKINS COUNTY 691 The Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, Tennessee and United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Amer- ican Federation of Labor , Local No. 102, Peti- tioner . Case 10-RC-7070 October 6, 1967 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION BY CHAIRMAN MCCULLOCH AND MEMBERS FANNING , BROWN , AND JENKINS Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, a hearing was held before Hearing Officer George L. Card, Jr. Thereafter, the Employer and the Peti- tioner filed briefs. The National Labor Relations Board has reviewed the Hearing Officer's rulings made at the hearing and finds that they are free from prejudicial error. They are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board finds: 1. The Employer, also referred to as the District, moved to dismiss the petition on grounds that, as an exempt political subdivision of the State of Tennes- see, the Board may not assert jurisdiction herein. In rejecting this contention, we find that the Employer is not a political subdivision within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the Act.' In this connection, the facts show that the Em- ployer was incorporated in December 1957 under the provisions of the Tennessee Utility District Act and is engaged in the sale and distribution of natural gas to residential houses, commercial businesses, and industrial firms, all of which are located within Hawkins County, Tennessee. The Employer is organized to supply gas utility service without pecuniary profit. The Employer conducts its business without supervision of the State or any political subdivision thereof. It hires its own employees, and sets their terms and conditions of employment. It also has the usual powers of a private corporation, e.g., it may sue and be sued, incur obligations, issue bonds, sell and encumber its property, and enter into contracts necessary or con- venient to the exercise of the powers granted to it. The Employer contends, however, that it is not the customary public utility inasmuch as the Ten- nessee statute under which it is organized specifi- cally declares that a utility district is a "municipali- ty" or "public corporation,"2 and the Supreme Court of Tennessee has held that utility districts are "arms or instrumentalities" of the State of Tennes- see.3 However, while such State law declarations and interpretations are given careful consideration by the Board, they are not necessarily controlling.4 Rather, the determination of whether a particular entity falls within the exemption for political sub- divisions entails an assessment of all relevant fac- tors. Upon examination of the instant record in the light of the "economic realities and statutory pur- poses,"5 we are satisfied that the Employer exists as an essentially private venture, with insufficient identity with or relationship to the State of Tennes- see to support the conclusion that it is an exempt governmental employer under the Act. Thus, unlike the usual situation where jurisdiction has been declined on political subdivision grounds,6 the Em- ' Sec. 2(2) reads in material part- "The term 'employer '. . . shall not in- clude ... any State or political subdivision thereof 11 2 Tennessee Code, title 6 , ch. 26, sec. 7, District as municipality - Powers. From and after the date of the making and filing of such order of in- corporation , the district so incorporated shall be a "municipality" or public corporation in perpetuity under its corporate name and the same shall be a body politic and corporate with power of perpetual succession , but without any power to levy or collect taxes. Charges for services authorized herein , shall not be construed as taxes The powers of each district shall be vested in and exercised by a majority of the members of the Board of commissioners of the district . So long as the district continues to furnish any of the services which it is herein authorized to furnish , it shall be the sole public corporation empowered to furnish such services in the district unless and until it shall have been established that the public convenience and necessity requires other or additional services. [Acts 1937, ch. 248, sec 3, C. Supp . 1950, sec. 3695.28.1 'First Suburban Water Utility Dist . v. McCanless, 177 Tenn. 128, 146, S.W. 2d 948 (1941) ' In N.L.R.B. v. Randolph Electric Membership Corporation, and N.L.R.B. v. Tri-County Electric Membership Corporatiom 343 F.2d 60, 62 (C.A. 4), the court , in sustaining the Board 's finding that the companies were not "political subdivisions" despite the State legislatures declara- tion to the contrary and similar interpretations by State Attorney 167 NLRB No. 100 Generals, held: In the absence of a plain indication to the contrary, however, it is to be assumed when Congress enacts a statute it does not intend to make its application dependent on State law. In accord N L R.B. v Hearst Publications, 322 U S. 111, 123 (1944), 11. . Nothing in the Statute 's background, history, terms or purposes in- dicates its scope is to be limited by varying local conceptions, either statutory or judicial, or that it is to be administered in accordance with whatever different standards the respective States may see fit to adopt for the disposition of unrelated, local problems." s See Randolph, supra at 62 6 See, e g , Mobile Steamship Association, 8 NLRB 1297 , where the State Docks Commission, one of the employers , was created by specific legislation of the State of Alabama, Oxnard Harbor District, 34 NLRB 1285, a harbor district organized by district residents under a general enabling act of California, but governed by a board of commissioners elected for a term of office by qualified voters of the district, New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 2-RC-2245, April 16, 1954, an authority specifically created by the Legislature and governed by members appointed by the Governor with advice and consent of the Senate, New Bedford, Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket Steamship Authority, 127 NLRB 1322, a body corporate created by Massachusetts, consisting of members appointed and removed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Executive Council. 310-t41 0 - 70 - 45 692 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL ployer in this case is neither created directly by the State,7 nor administered by State-appointed or elected officials." Furthermore, its operations and services do not differ significantly from those of en- terprises in private industry including utilities whose employees are entitled to the benefits of the Act. The Employer is completely autonomous in the conduct of its day-to-day affairs, with the State exercising no supervisory role with respect thereto, or reserving any power to remove or otherwise discipline those responsible for the Employer's operations. In these circumstances, we are satisfied that the State pronouncements are not determina- tive of the public nature of the Employer's functions and activities. We are also not persuaded that mere possession of the power of eminent domain which, as here, has been conferred in aid of a venture which is essentially private in nature, requires us to find that the Employer constitutes a political sub- division under Section 2(2) of the Act. In this re- gard, we think it significant that legislatures have frequently delegated such power to nonexempt privately owned and operated service corpora- tions.`' Indeed, the Tennessee Legislature itself has delegated such authority to private corporations. " In these circumstances we find that the District is an Employer within the meaning of Section 2(2) The Utility Districts are not created directly by the State They are formed by petition of property owners upon a County Judge's determina- tion of the feasibility thereof Thus, the District is no more a direct crea- tion of the State than such privately owned public service companies as railroads and motor carriers , which also require some form of governmen- tal approval , such as a certificate of convenience and necessity 8 The County Judge exercises no independent discretion in naming the members of the board of commissioners He must by statute appoint those persons nominated in the petition seeking formation of a district " N C Public Service Co v Southern Power Co , 282 F 2d 837 (C A 4), writ of cert denied 263 U S 508, Whiting Mfg Co v Carolina Alu- minum Co, 207 N C 52, 175 S E 698, Berry v Southern Pine Electric Power Assn , 222 Miss 260, 76 So 2d 212, Bookhart v Central Electric Power Coop , 219 S C 414, 65 S E 2d 781, as explained in Black River LABOR RELATIONS BOARD of the Act. Accordingly, and as the record shows and the parties agree that the Employer's opera- tions satisfy the Board's commerce standards for public utilities, we find that the Employer is en- gaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain employees of the Employer. 3. A question affecting commerce exists con- cerning the representation of employees of the Em- ployer within the meaning of Section 9(c)(1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. 4. In accordance with the parties' stipulation, we find that the following employees of the Employer constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of col- lective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act: All pipe fitters employed at the Employer's Rogersville, Tennessee, operation, but exclud- ing all other employees, office clerical em- ployees, salesmen, warehousemen, profes- sional employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act. [Direction of Election" omitted from publica- tion.] Electric Coop., v Public Service Commission, 238 S C 232, 120 S E 2d 6, 12, Hagans v Excelsior Electric Membership Corp, 207 Ga 53, S E 2d 162, Alabama Power Co v Cullman County Electric Membership Corp , 234 Ala. 396, 174 So 866 "'Tennessee Code, title 48 , ch 1, sec I, et seq " An election eligibility list, containing the names and addresses of all the eligible voters, must be filed by the Employer with the Regional Director for Region 10 within 7 days after the date of this Decision and Direction of Election The Regional Director shall make the list available to all parties to the election No extension of time to file this list shall be granted by the Regional Director except in extraordinary circumstances Failure to comply with this requirement shall be grounds for setting aside the election whenever proper objections are filed Excelsior Underwear Inc, 156NLRB 1236 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation