The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Feb 10, 1960

126 N.L.R.B. 580 (N.L.R.B. 1960)

580 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
(2) Morris Gurewitz d/b/a Washington Rendering Company is an employer
within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the Act
(3) All drivers and sales drivers at the Los Angeles, California, rendering plant
of the Company, excluding all other employees, constitute a unit appropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Art
(4) Meat and Provision Drivers, Local 626, International Brotherhood of Team-
sters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Independent, is, and at
all times material herein has been, the exclusive representative of the employees in
the above appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the
meaning of Section 9(a) of the Act
(5) By refusing to bargain collectively with the Company, Meat and Provision
Drivers, Local 626, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-
men and Helpers of America, Independent, has engaged in unfair labor practice&
within the meaning of Section 8(b) (3) of the Act
(6) The above unfair labor practices are unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act
[Recommendations omitted from publication ]
The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company , National Bakery
Division and Bakers Local Union No. 57, American Bakery
and Confectionery Workers International Union , AFL-CIO,
Petitioner. Case No 9-RC-3692 February 10, 1960
DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, a hearing in this case was held before Thomas M
Sheeran, hearing officer The hearing officer's rulings made at the
hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the Act, the Board
has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member
panel [Members Rodgers, Bean, and Fanning]
Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds
1 The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the
Act
2 Bakers Local Union No 57, Bakery and Confectionery Workers
International Union of America, referred to herein as BCW Local
57, and its International, referred to herein as BCW were permitted
to intervene on the basis of the Local's contract interest The Peti-
tioner and the Intervenors are labor organizations claiming to repre-
sent certain employees of the Employer
3 The Intervenors contend that a contract between BCW Local 57
and the Employer, effective August 10, 1958, is a bar to this proceeding
for the first 2 years of its term The Petitioner maintains that the
contract is not a bar because of a schism in BCW Local 57, allegedly
caused by the basic intraunion conflict in BCW which resulted in its
expulsion from AFL-CIO The Intervenors, however, contend that
the schism allegations should be rejected on the ground that the action
occurred an unreasonably long time after the beginning of the basic
126 NLRB No 71
THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, ETC 581
intraunion conflict, and was not in fact related to that conflict 1 The
Employer is neutral
Charges of corruption were brought against the President and other
officers of BCW in March 1957, and soon became a subject of discus-
sion and concern in BCW Local 57 In October 1957, the membership
approved a motion that its officers do everything possible to have BCW
call a convention in order to remedy the alleged abuses and to main-
tain its standing in the AFL-CIO BOW was however expelled by
AFL-CIO in December 1957, and ABC was chartered at the same
time ABC thereafter invited many BCW locals, including Local
57, to affiliate with it, claiming in its invitation that its health and
welfare funds would pay benefits equivalent to those of BCW This
claim was immediately answered by BCW which charged that such
claims were a fraud, and that ABC would be unable to pay any
benefits for at least a year
A special convention of BCW was held in March 1958, at which
its officers made their case against the charges which had led to its
expulsion from AFL-CIO Although the delegates from Local 57
were uninstructed as to the retention of the BCW officers accused of
corrupt practices, they had expressed themselves to the membership,
before leaving for the convention, as being in favor of a BCW cleanup
in accordance with the AFL-CIO mandates The Local 57 delegates
voted for the reelection of Cross who was unopposed as president,
because of assurances that he would be exonerated if reelected and
could then take the necessary steps to reaf Bate with AFL-CIO
However, at the general membership meeting of Local 57 following the
convention, the members were not fully convinced that BCW in-
tended to reaffiliate, and then considered what steps might be taken
to protect their funds from BCW if the Local should leave the
International
The record reveals a continuing concern on the part of Local 57
members and officers from this time on for the protection of its health,
welfare, and pension funds if they sought to disaffiliate from BCW
That such concern was well founded is indicated by the fact that on
several occasions Cross had warned BCW Locals that their-funds
would be imperilled if they sought to join ABC Thereafter,
throughout 1958, Fmck, a BCW International representative and an
influential member of Local 57, threatened the Local with trusteeship
1 In Hershey Chocolate Corporation , 121 NLRB 901 , the Board held that the expulsion
of BCW from the AFL--CIO on charges of corruption, and the chartering of ABC with
substantially the same jurisdiction, established the existence of a basic intraunion con-
flict which was a prerequisite to a finding of schism. The Board also held that henceforth
a schism in a bargaining representative would warrant an immediate election, despite a
current contract, only if such action was taken a reasonable time after the alleged intra-
union conflict arose See also Cincinnati Bakers Club , 121 NLRB 442, and St Louis
Bakery Employers Labor Council, 121 NLRB 1,548
582 DECISIONS, OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
and loss of funds if it sought to leave BCW 3 In June 1958, 3 months
after the special BCW convention, Local 57 was expelled from the
Columbus Federation of Labor, an organization of 66 Locals belong-
ing to internationals affiliated with AFL-CIO Brush, financial
secretary of Local 57, told Greer, an official of the Federation, that
he intended to see that Local 57 took steps to reaf Bate with the Fed-
eration, and at his request a meeting was arranged with Kircher, an
ABC representative who had assisted other BCW Locals in switching
over to ABC About this time Local 57 retained an attorney to
advise it on disaffiliation steps, and at the end of September 1958, the
attorney and two officials of Local 57 met with Kircher at Columbus
Kircher was told that they intended to reaffiliate with AFL-CIO
since BCW had failed to do so
However, BCW President Cross whose offices were in Washington,
learned of this meeting that same day, and immediately assigned
Frock and another BCW representative the job of seeing that Local
57 remained in BCW The two representatives flew to Columbus and
arranged for Brush and Egan, the local officials who had met with
Kircher, to attend a meeting with an officer of a Teamsters local in
the area At the meeting Brush and Egan were asked what their
intentions were since it was known they had met with ABC officials,
and, as the Teamster official put it, he had to call "both Jimmies"
(Hoffa and Cross) who wanted to know. Frock again threatened to
put Local 57 under trusteeship Subjected to this pressure, Brush
and Egan agreed to keep Local 57 in BCW Four days later Finck
and his companion attended the executive board meeting of Local 57
While they were out of the room Brush explained to the board the
circumstances of their recent meeting with the Teamsters, and recom-
mended that they act with caution so as to protect the Local 's funds
The board then approved a motion to remain with BCW
Thereafter Finck inspected the minute book of the Local in which
discussions and actions taken at local meetings were recorded, and
also attended such meetings Brush and Egan, however, remained
secretly in contact with ABC representatives concerning disaffiliation
devlopments of other BCW Locals Matters came to a head in April
1959 when BCW terminated Finck's services with the International
A few weeks later ABC hired Finck as one of its International repre-
sentatives and, relieved of that pressure, Local 57 rapidly took steps
to transfer its funds to ABC for protection Notices of a meeting to
consider disaffiliation were sent to all members, posted in the plants
and announced by newspaper, radio, and television More than 500
of the 1,400 members of Local 57 attended the meeting on May 16, an
attendance about 10 times greater than that at a regular meeting
2 Local 57 had been placed under trusteeship some years before, with Finck acting as
Trustee.
THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, ETC . 583
Brush explained that the close supervision by BCW over the Local's
affairs had made it necessary to act cautiously in attempting dis-
affiliation. The membership then approved without opposition a
resolution to join ABC because BCW had violated its fiduciary obliga-
tion. Two days later BCW placed Local 57 under trusteeship. The
Employer has since held in escrow all dues checked off from its em-
ployees pending a determination as to whether ABC or BCW is the
rightful bargaining representative.
Contrary to the contention of the Intervenors, we are satisfied that
the chief reason for the disaffiliation of Local 57 related to the basic
intraunion conflict which resulted in the expulsion of BCW from
AFL-CIO. The concern of Local 57 over the protection of its funds
and rights to health and pension benefits was a direct consequence of
the wishes of the officers and members of Local 57 that BCW either
comply with AFL-CIO standards and reaffiliate with it, or that the
Local leave BCW. If Local 57 had been disinterested in the merits
of the intraunion conflict in BCW there would have been no need
to be concerned about economic losses which could result from affiliat-
ing with ABC. Nor do we believe that the period between the ex-
pulsion of BCW from AFL-CIO in December 1957 and the disaffilia-
tion of Local 57 in May 1959 was unreasonably long in view of the
threats, surveillance, and intimidation by BCW and its agents. Con-
trary to the Intervenors, we are satisfied that Finck's transference
of his allegiance to ABC in April 1959 was not itself the reason for
Local 57's disaffiliation, but rather provided the opportunity through
which the Local could reach its objective-reaffiliation with AFL-
CIO without economic loss. We conclude, therefore, that the dis-
affiliation taken has resulted in confusion disrupting bargaining
relationships, and that a schism exists which removes the contract as
a bar to an immediate election.' In view of the above finding we need
not consider the Petitioner's other objections to the contract as a bar.
Questions affecting commerce exist concerning the representation
of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1)
and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
4. We find, in accord with the agreement of the parties, that the
unit described below, which conforms to the contract unit, is appro-
priate for purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of
Section 9 (b) of the Act :
All production and maintenance employees of the Employer at its
baking plant at Columbus, Ohio, including shipping, cleaning, and
sanitation department employees, but excluding office clerical and
professional employees, warehousemen and truckdrivers, guards, and
supervisors as defined in the Act.
[Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.]
8 Oregon Macaroni Company, at as., 124 NLRB 1001.