The Curtis Bay Towing Co. of PennsylvaniaDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsDec 6, 194564 N.L.R.B. 1208 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter of THE CURTIS BAY TOWING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, SHERIDAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, P. F. MARTIN, INC., BERNARD TUCKER'S SONS, INDEPENDENT TOWING COMPANY, CHARLES T. BANKS TOWING LINE, AND TAYLOR & ANDERSON TOWING & LIGHTERAGE COM- PANY and UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, DISTRICT 50, LOCAL UNION 13039 Case No. 4-R-1836.-Decided December 6,1945 Rawle and Henderson, by Mr. Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadel- phia, Pa., for The Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania. Mr. Robert G. Kelly, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Sheridan Transporta- tion Company, P. F. Martin, Inc., Bernard Tucker's Sons, Independent Towing Company, Charles T. Banks Towing Line, and Taylor & Anderson Towing & Lighterage Company. Messrs. William E. Collier, Robert H. Brownley, and Fred Thomas, of Philadelphia, Pa., for District 50. Mr. William L. Standard, of New York City, by Mr. Herman Rosen- feld, and Mr. E. E. Williams, for the N. M. U. Mr. A. Sumner Lawrence, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by United Mine Workers of America, Dis- trict 50, Local Union 13039, herein called District 50, alleging that questions affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of The Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania; Sheridan Transportation Company, P. F. Martin, Inc. ; Bernard Tuck- er's Sons; Independent Towing Company; Charles T. Banks Towing Line; and Taylor & Anderson Towing & Lighterage, Company; 1 all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, herein collectively called the Companies, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hear- ing upon due notice before Herman Lazarus, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on September 21, 'At the hearing the parties agreed to amend the caption of the case to substitute for "Tugboat Owners and Operators of the Port of Philadelphia" the names of the individual Companies as set forth herein and to permit the Board to make similar substitutions throughout the record wherever it is necessary. 64 N. L. R. B., No. 203. 1208 THE CURTIS BAY TOWING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.1209 1945. The Companies, District 50, and National Maritime Union of America, C. I. 0., herein called the N. M. U., appeared and partici- pated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be 'heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bear- ing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error, and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS of FACT 1. T1 1E BUSINESS OF THE COMPANIES The record reveals that all the Companies involved herein are en- gaged in and derive substantial income from the operation of tug boats used in the towing and docking of oceangoing vessels engaged in foreign and interstate commerce. The Companies admit, and we find, that they are engaged in com- merce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 11. THE ORGA14IZATIONS INVOLVED United Mine Workers of America, District 50, Local Union 13039, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Com- panies. National Maritime Union of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, ig a labor organization admitting to mem- bership employees of the Companies. ITT. TIIE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Companies have refused to grant recognition to District 50 as the exclusive bargaining representative of certain of its employees unless and until District 50 has been certified by the National Labor Relations Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear- ing, indicates that District 50 represents a substantial number of employees in the unit it alleges to be appropriate.2 We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Companies, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. E The Field Examiner reported that District 50 submitted 145 authorization cards ; that the names of 91 persons appearing on the cards were listed on the Companies ' pay rolls of August 14 , 1945, which contained the names of 152 employees in the unit claimed appro- priate by District 50; and that 48 were dated in June , 19 in July , and 6 in August, 1945; 18 were undated . The N. M. U. submitted authorizations signed by 26 persons , 11 of whose names were listed on the Companies ' pay rolls of August 14, 1945. 1210 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, in substantial agreement with a stipulation of the parties, that all unlicensed personnel employed on board the tug boats of the Companies operating, except for temporary or occasional opera- tions elsewhere, exclusively upon the Delaware River and Bay and their tributaries, and upon the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, con- stitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9,(b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direc- tion.3 DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain represents= tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with The Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania, Sheridan Transportation Com- pany, P. F. Martin, Inc., Bernard Tucker's Sons, Independent Towing Company, Charles T. Banks Towing Line, and Taylor & Anderson Towing & Lighterage Company, all of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Fourth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period im- mediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during the said pay-roll period because they were a Charges of unfair labor practices (4-C-1523), filed by the N. M. U. against the Com- panies since the date of the hearing, have been settled with the approval of the Board The motion of the N. M U., requesting the Board to set aside the settlement, is accordingly denied. Should the N. M. U. desire not to participate in the election , its name will be removed from the ballot if a request is made to the Regional Director within 5 days from the date hereof. THE CURTIS BAY TOWING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.1211 ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Mine Workers of America, District 50, Local Union 13039, or by National Maritime Union of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation