Terry B. Braaten, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 26, 2009
0120091965 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 26, 2009)

0120091965

08-26-2009

Terry B. Braaten, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Terry B. Braaten,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091965

Agency No. 4E-800-0025-09

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final

agency decision dated March 5, 2009, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim.

On November 17, 2008, complainant initiated EEO contact alleging that

the agency treated him disparately and subjected him to a hostile work

environment on the basis of disability (neck, back and hip injuries).

Specifically, complainant alleged that, between May 10, 2007 and January

7, 2008, the agency required him to attend four Family and Medical Leave

Act (FMLA) evaluations without cause; between August 16, 2007 and July 7,

2008, it delayed and denied his FMLA requests on numerous occasions; and,

after the denial of his FMLA requests, it issued him disciplinary actions.

In a formal EEO complaint dated February 11, 2009, complainant alleged

that the agency discriminated against him based on disability when it

improperly denied his FMLA certification. Complainant noted that he

included incidents that occurred more than 45 days prior to his initial

EEO contact date as background only.

In its March 5 dismissal, the agency stated that FMLA falls within the

jurisdiction of the Department of Labor and that an EEO complaint based

on FMLA matters lodges a collateral attack on that forum. The instant

appeal from complainant followed, without substantive comment.

After a careful review of the record, we agree with the agency's

dismissal of complainant's claim. The regulation set forth at 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part, that an agency shall

dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. Complainant's claim

challenges the process for another forum and constitutes a collateral

attack upon that process, and therefore fails to state a claim. See Wills

v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998); Kleinman

v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940585 (September 22, 1994).

Such an attack is not actionable under EEO statutes. The proper forum

for complainant to have raised his challenges to actions which occurred

during the FMLA process is within that process itself. Accordingly,

we AFFIRM the final agency decision dismissing complainant's complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 26, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120091965

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120091965