Teresa J. Montano, Complainant,v.Tom J. Vilsack, Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Farm Service Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 22, 2011
0120112377 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 22, 2011)

0120112377

12-22-2011

Teresa J. Montano, Complainant, v. Tom J. Vilsack, Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Farm Service Agency), Agency.




Teresa J. Montano,

Complainant,

v.

Tom J. Vilsack,

Secretary,

Department of Agriculture

(Farm Service Agency),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112377

Agency No. FS-2011-00052

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated March 1, 2011, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

for the U.S. Postal Service in New Mexico. Complainant was not employed

by the Agency; rather, her husband was an Agency employee. On December

6, 2010, Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency

subjected her to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian),

national origin (Hispanic), sex (female), and marital status (married

to an Agency employee) when:

1. On or about October 21, 2010, management failed to launch an

investigation or take any corrective action after she reported having

received an anonymous letter at her workplace (U.S. Postal Service),

on October 4, 2010, which detailed her husband’s alleged affairs with

women at his workplace; and

2. On or about on September 20, 2010, management failed to launch an

investigation or take any corrective action after she reported having

received an anonymous letter at her residence, dated September 16, 2010,

which detailed her husband's alleged affairs with women at his workplace.

The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim. The Agency determined that Complainant

was not an employee of the Agency and therefore had not suffered a

present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there was a remedy. As a result, the Agency

dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. Complainant

presented no arguments or contentions on appeal.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) provides for the dismissal

of a complaint which fails to state a claim within the meaning of 29

C.F.R. § 1614.103. In order to establish standing initially under

29 C.F.R. § 1614.103, a complainant must be either an employee or

an applicant for employment of the agency against which the claims

of discrimination are raised. In addition, the claims must concern

an employment policy or practice which affects the individual in his

capacity as an employee or applicant for employment.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because Complainant failed to show that she suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (Apr. 21, 1994). Specifically, the Commission finds

that Complainant is neither an employee nor an applicant for employment

with the Agency and thus, Complainant lacks standing to advance her claims

through the federal sector EEO process. Accordingly, the Agency's final

decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (Nov. 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the

request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as

stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ December 22, 2011

Carlton M. Hadden, Director Date

Office of Federal Operations

2

0120112377

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013