Tennessee Valley Broadcasting Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 6, 194773 N.L.R.B. 1509 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY BROADCASTING COMPANY, EM- PLOYER and RADIO BROADCAST TECHNICIANS LOCAL UNION 1564 of THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS (AFL), PETITIONER Cases Nos. 10-R-3562 and 10-R-2564.Decided June 6, 1947 1't1r. S. A. Lynn, of Decatur, Ala., for the Employer. Jfr. Edmund J. Flynn, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES Upon two petitions duly filed, the National Labor Relations Board on March 20, 1947, conducted two prehearing elections among em- ployees of the Employer in the units alleged to be appropriate to determine whether or not they desired to be represented by the Petitioner for the purposes of collective bargaining., At the close of the elections, Tallies of Ballots were furnished the parties. These Tallies show that the two eligible voters in each of the two units cast their ballots for the Petitioner. Thereafter, a hearing 2 was held at Decatur, Alabama, on April 7J, 1947, before Charles M. Paschal, Jr., hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF TIIE EMPLOYER Tennessee Valley Broadcasting Company is an Alabama corpora- tion operating Radio Station WMSL, a 250-watt station located at Decatur, Alabama. In addition to local features the Employer broad- casts programs originating with the Mutual Broadcasting Company, press releases supplied by United Press, and national advertising. These cases were ordered consolidated by the Board on April 3, 1947. The Petitioner did not appear at the hearing. 73 N. L. R. B., No. 255. 1509 1510 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD The Employer's effective broadcasting'area covers a radius of approxi- mately 50 miles, reaching into the State of Tennessee. We find that the Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclu- sive bargaining representative of the employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in appropriate units. We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer , within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and ( 7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNITS The Petitioner requests two separate bargaining units, one unit for regular announcers and another unit covering radio technicians. There are two employees in each of these units.3 We find that (1) all regular staff, announcers and (2) all radio technicians of the Employer's Radio Station WMSL, at Decatur, Alabama, excluding all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute two separate units appropriate for the purposes of collective bargain- ing within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act' V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES Inasmuch as the Petitioner has received a majority of the valid votes cast in each unit, we shall certify it as the exclusive bargaining representative of all the employees in the two appropriate units. CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that Radio Broadcast Technicians Local Union 1564 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (AFL) has been designated and selected by a majority of the em- ployees in the units described in Section IV, above, as their repre- 3 The Board has frequently held that any number of employees , exceeding one, may properly constitute an appropriate unit See, for example , Matter of A. S Campbell Co., Inc, 69 N L R B 1285, 1287 4 See Matter of Badger Broadcasting Co , 64 N L R B 1456, 1458. TENNESSEE VALLEY BROADCASTING COMPANY 1511 sentative for the purposes of collective bargaining and that, pursuant to Section 9 (a) of the Act , the aforesaid organization is the exclusive representative of all such employees for the purposes of collective bargaining with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, and other conditions of employment. CHAIRMAN HERZOG took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Certification of Representatives. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation