Tarrie Rucker, ) Appellant, )

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 3, 1999
01983729 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 3, 1999)

01983729

09-03-1999

Tarrie Rucker, ) Appellant, )


Tarrie Rucker, ) Appellant, )

) Appeal No. 01983729

v. ) Agency No. 4H-370-0026-98

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

INTRODUCTION

Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final agency

decision (FAD) concerning his complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination

in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �621 et seq. The FAD

was dated March 27, 1998. The appeal was postmarked on April 9, 1998.

Accordingly, the appeal is timely (see 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a)), and is

accepted in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960.001, as amended.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed one of the

bases in appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

Appellant initially contacted an EEO Counselor on October 17, 1997.

The EEO Counselor noted in her report that "records do not reveal [that]

the complainant has prior EEO activity." Appellant then filed a formal

complaint on February 17, 1998, alleging discrimination on the bases

of sex (male), physical disability (back and leg injury), age (40), and

retaliation (prior EEO activity) when he was assigned tasks outside of

his limitations and was denied union representation on October 11, 1997.

In its FAD, the agency dismissed retaliation as a basis of appellant's

complaint. It was the agency's position that appellant had not engaged

in EEO activity prior to the instant complaint and, could not, therefore,

claim retaliation. This appeal followed.

In his statement on appeal, appellant presented three exhibits

demonstrating that he had, in fact, engaged in EEO activity prior to

October 17, 1997, despite the agency's assertion to the contrary.

Appellant supplied the following: (1) a copy of a Request for EEO

Counseling, dated February 7, 1996, in which appellant requested

precomplaint counseling with regard to working conditions at his work

station; (2) a letter to appellant, dated February 7, 1996, from the

Senior EEO Complaints Processing Specialist for the agency acknowledging

appellant's request for precomplaint counseling; (3) a statement from an

agency EEO office employee verifying that appellant sought EEO Counseling

in March of 1996.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) provides that an agency may

dismiss a complaint which fails to state a claim, pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.103. For employees and applicants for employment, EEOC

Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.103(a) provides that individual and class

complaints of employment discrimination and retaliation prohibited

by Title VII, the ADEA, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Equal Pay Act

shall be processed in accordance with this part. EEOC Regulation

29 C.F.R. �1614.101(b) provides that no person shall be subject to

retaliation for opposing any practice made unlawful by Title VII, the

Equal Pay Act or the Rehabilitation Act or for participating in any

stage of administrative or judicial proceedings under these statutes.

Appellant has clearly demonstrated that he participated in EEO activity

prior to the filing of the instant complaint. We find, therefore,

that the agency must reinstate "retaliation" as a basis for appellant's

complaint.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the decision of the agency is REVERSED and REMANDED for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to reinstate "retaliation" as a basis for

appellant's complaint and to process appellant's complaint in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the complaint within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to appellant

a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant of the

appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved

prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision without

a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60)

days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

___09-03-99___ __________________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations