Susan Peterson, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 20, 2003
05A30494 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 20, 2003)

05A30494

03-20-2003

Susan Peterson, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Susan Peterson v. Department of the Army

05A30494

March 20, 2003

.

Susan Peterson,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30494

Appeal No. 01A21250

Agency No. BKEXFO9904J0040

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Complainant timely initiated a request to the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to reconsider the decision in Susan Peterson

v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01A21250 (January 27, 2003).

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,

reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party

demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision

will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations

of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In her request for reconsideration, complainant states that she never

received a transcript of the proceedings from a hearing before an EEOC

Administrative Judge. Complainant requests that the agency be sanctioned

for failing to produce the transcript. Upon review of the record, we find

that complainant requested the agency issue a final agency decision based

on the evidence of record when she learned that the Administrative Judge

who had presided over her hearing had left the EEOC. The agency issued a

final decision pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.110(b). Complainant appealed

the agency's final decision to the Commission without raising her concern

about the agency's failure to provide her with a transcript. We remind

complainant that a �request for reconsideration is not a second appeal

to the Commission.� Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17.

This Commission carefully considered all of the record evidence at the

time it rendered the initial decision in question, and complainant has

offered no persuasive reason why this decision should be reconsidered

now. After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it

is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01A21250 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 20, 2003

Date