Superior Steel & Malleable Castings Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 11, 194238 N.L.R.B. 1099 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of SUPERIOR STEEL & MALLEABLE CASTINGS Co. and INTER- NATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 965, C. I. O. Case No. R-3417.-Decided February 11, 1942 Jurisdiction : steel and malleable iron castings manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal of employer to accord recognition to petitioning union ; dispute as to appropriate unit ; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : single unit comprising production and maintenance employees, excluding supervisory, clerical, and office em- ployees in two plants in close proximity, having services and facilities in common, held appropriate, despite Company's contention that a separate unit for each was appropriate. Mr. Lynn W. Beman, of Chicago, Ill., and Mr. Vance E. Fisher, of Benton Harbor, Mich., for the'Company. Mr. Vane Pickering, of St. Joseph, Mich., and Mr. Robert S. Feld- man; of Benton Harbor, Mich., for the Union. Mr. Robert C. Moore, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On October 6, 1941, International Union, United Automobile, Air- craft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 965, C. I. 0., herein called the United, filed with the Regional Director for the Seventh Region (Detroit, Michigan) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representa- tion of employees of Superior Steel & Malleable Castings Co.,' herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On December 10, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act, and Article III, Section i Erroneously referred to in the formal papers as Superior Steel & Malleable Casting Co. 38 N. L R. B., No 206. 1099 1100 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On December 15, 1941, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which, together with copies of the petition, were duly served upon the Company, upon the United, and upon the follow- ing unions, named in the petition as having an interest in the pro- ceeding: (1) International Moulders & Foundry Workers Union of North America, A. F. L., and (2) Pattern Makers Association of Benton Harbor, A. F. L. Pursuant to notice a hearing was held at St. Joseph, Michigan, on December 22 and 23, 1941, before Jerome H. Brooks, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Ex- aminer. The Company and the United appeared, were represented by counsel, and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evi- dence bearing upon the issues was afforded all parties. During the hearing the Trial Examiner made rulings on motions and on objec- tions to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rul- ings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. On January 7,1942, the Company filed a brief, which the Board has considered. Upon the entire record in the case the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Superior Steel & Malleable Castings Co. is a Michigan corporation having its principal office and plant in Benton Harbor, Michigan. The Company manufactures steel and malleable iron castings. The principal materials used by the Company in its operations are pig iron, steel, and iron scrap, moulding sand, fuel oil, alloys, lumber, wire, nails, and grinding wheels. During the period from January 1, 1941, through October 1941, the Company purchased raw materials and merchandise valued at more that $484,055, of which about 92 pcr- cent was imported from sources outside the State of Michigan. Dur- ing the same period the Company's finished products were valued at more than $1,299,000, and about 88.65 percent of these products was shipped to purchasers outside the State of Michigan. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 965, affiliated with the Congress SUPERIOR SfPEIEL & MALLEABLE CASTI GSI CO. 1101 of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. M. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The United has requested and has been refused recognition by the Company as exclusive bargaining agent for its employees? There exists a dispute between the parties with respect to the unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company as described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The manufacturing operations of the Company are carried on in two main buildings, of which one houses its steel castings plant, and the other its malleable-iron castings plant. It is the contention of the United that all employees in both plants, excluding supervisory, clerical, and office employees, constitute the appropriate bargaining unit. The Company agrees with the United's classification of em- ployees to be included, but contends that two units are proper; one to include employees in the steel plant, and another to include those employed in the malleable plant. In support of its claim that the two plants constitute separate units, the Company points to the fact that each plant has its own superintendent, that the nature of the work and the skills required are different, and that prior collective bar- gaining has taken place on a two-plant basis rather than on the basis of a single unit. The United presented for the Trial Examiner 's inspection a total of about 335 member- ship applications dated between May and December 16, 1941 . Of these, 198 purported to be applications from employees in the Company 's steel plant, while the remaining 137 ap- peared to represent applications from employees in the malleable -iron plant. The unit alleged by the United to be appropriate contained about 560 employees ; I. e., 387 in the steel plant, and 173 in the malleable plant. About 234 of these applications (divided be- tween the steel and malleable plants in the ratio of 158 to 76 , respectively) bore apparently genuine original signatures of employees appearing on the Company ' s November 9, 1941, pay roll . The remainder either (1) bore signatures of persons who did not appear on said pay roll ; ( 2) bore no signatures but named employees on said pay roll ; or (3) bore no signa- tures and named persons who did not appear on said pay roll. 1102 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD When the Company first commenced operating in 1916 and for several years thereafter , it operated only a steel castings plant. About 1922 the malleable -iron castings plant was put into operation. At the time of the hearing, slightly more than twice as many persons were employed in the steel plant as were employed in the malleable plant. The steel and malleable plants are in close proximity, being separated by a small office building. All the Company 's properties are located on a tract of land slightly more than 10 acres in area. The office building houses the Company 's single office , a cafeteria, and a first aid station maintained for the benefit of all employees. Employees in both plants enter through this building and may use either of two time clocks maintained therein. Other facilities and services maintained in common for both plants include a pattern shop, a maintenance crew, watchmen , and a storeroom for small.sup- plies. There is but a single employment office and labor policy is decided for both plants by the president of the Company . There is some, although not extensive , interchange of work between plants in order to utilize special machinery present in only one of the plants, and there has been some interchange of labor. While the nature of the work and the skills required differ to some extent , an analysis prepared by the Company as of December 23, 1941 , shows that 370 of its 561 employees in the 2 plants might be used in either plant with approximately equal facility , while an additional 83 employees could be interchanged after a short training period. Although separate pay rolls are made tip for each - plant, this is done solely for accounting purposes , and identical check forms are used in paying the employees in the 2 plants. There had been no collective bargaining in the Company's estab- lishment prior to about June 1937 , when the Iron Moulders Union of North America conducted an organizational campaign among employees engaged at the malleable plant and ultimately secured the Company 's recognition as representative for those employees. Shortly thereafter an independent organization came into being among the workers at the steel plant. As a result of separate bar- gaining with these two organizations the Company , about June 1937, granted a general pay increase applicable to both plants . The record discloses , however , that these arrangements were short -lived, the Moulders Union apparently having disintegrated within a year, while the independent union appears to have been inactive or non -existent since the original bargaining in June 1937 . We do not believe that the short -lived dealings between the Company and these two organ- izations in 1937 establish that separate units are appropriate, par- ticularly where the only organization now involved has organized a substantial number of the employees at each plant. SUPERIOR STEEL & MALLEABLE C'ASTTNGS CO. 1103 We find that all production and maintenance employees, excluding supervisory, clerical, and office employees, constitute a unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining and that said unit will insure to the employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise will effectuate the policies of the Act.$ VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot. The parties agreed that, in the event of an election, eligibility to vote therein should be determined by reference to a current pay roll. We shall direct that those eligible to vote in the election shall be those within the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period- ending immediately preceding the date of our Direction of Election, subject to the additions and limitations set forth in the Direction. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the rep- resentation of employees of Superior Steel and Malleable Castings Co., Benton Harbor, Michigan, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. All production and maintenance employees of the Company, excluding supervisory, clerical; and office employees, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as a part of the investigation ordered by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Superior Steel and Malleable Castings Co., Benton Harbor, Michigan, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as S See Matter of J C Spach Wagon Works, Inc and Upholsterers International Uni.on of North America, (A. F. L.), 31 N. L. R. B., No. 21; Matter of Harbison -Walker Refractories Company and United Brick and Clay Workers of America , Local #702, 37 N . L. R. B. 785. 1104 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Seventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sec- tion 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all production and maintenance employees of the Company, who were employed during the pay-roll period ending immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay- roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding supervisory, clerical, and office employees and employees who have since quit or have been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Inter- national Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Im- plement Workers of America, Local 965, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation