Sunrise Health & Rehab Center

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Nov 30, 2000

332 N.L.R.B. 1304 (N.L.R.B. 2000)

DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 1304
Richmond Health Care d/b/a Sunrise Health and Re-
habilitation Center and 1115 Florida Division of
1199, Service Employees International Union,
AFL–CIO, CLC. Case 12–CA–20900
November 30, 2000
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN TRUESDALE AND MEMBERS FOX
AND LIEBMAN
Pursuant to a charge filed on June 15, 2000, the Gen-
eral Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board is-
sued a complaint on July 24, 2000, alleging that the Re-
spondent has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Act by refusing the Union’s re-
quests to bargain following the Union’s certifications in
Cases 12–RC–8064 (the service unit) and 12–RC–8065
(the licensed practical nurse unit) as amended by stipula-
tion of the parties in Cases 12–AC–37 and 12–AC–38
(Official notice is taken of the “record” in the representa-
tion proceeding as defined in the Board’s Rules and
Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and 102.69(g); Frontier Hotel,
265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The Respondent filed an answer
admitting in part and denying in part the allegations in
the complaint.
On September 29, 2000, the General Counsel filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment. On October 4, 2000, the
Board issued an order transferring the proceeding to the
Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion
should not be granted. The Respondent filed a response.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
In its answer the Respondent admits its refusal to bar-
gain and to furnish information that is alleged to be rele-
vant and necessary to the Union’s role as bargaining rep-
resentative, but attacks the validity of the certifications
on the basis of its objections to the elections in the repre-
sentation proceeding.
The Respondent also argues, as it did in the underlying
representation case, that its licensed practical nurse
(LPN) charge nurses are supervisors within the meaning
of the Act. In its response to the Notice to Show Cause
the Respondent cites decisions of the Second, Third,
Fourth, and Sixth Circuits in support of its argument.
Each case, however, must be decided on its facts and in
the instant matter, the Regional Director carefully con-
sidered the duties of the Respondent’s LPN charge
nurses and found that the assignments and directions
made by them do not involve the exercise of independent
judgment. Furthermore, the evidence fails to establish
that there is a direct causal link between the charge
nurses’ evaluations and their assistants’ wages or job
tenure. See Harborside Health Care, Inc., 330 NLRB
1334 (2000). And finally, the Regional Director found
that the nurse’s role in the disciplinary process is reporto-
rial in nature. In these circumstances, the Board denied
review of the Regional Director’s decision.
Further, the Respondent’s citation to the decisions of
the above listed Circuits is selective and fails to ac-
knowledge that the Board’s standard for determining
supervisory status of nurses has been upheld by the First,
Eighth, Ninth, and District of Columbia Circuits. NLRB
v. Provident Nursing Home, 187 F.3d 133, 142–143 (1st
Cir. 1999), enfg. 324 NLRB No. 46 (1997) (not reported
in Board volumes); Lynwood Health Care Center, Min-
nesota, Inc. v. NLRB, 148 F.3d 1042 (8th Cir. 1998),
enfg. 323 NLRB No. 200 (1997) (not reported in Board
volumes); Grandview Health Care Center v. NLRB, 129
F.3d 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1997), enfg. 322 NLRB No. 54
(1996) (not reported in Board volumes); Providence
Alaska Medical Center v. NLRB, 121 F.3d 548 (9th Cir.
1997), enfg. 321 NLRB No. 100 (1996) (not reported in
Board volumes).
Moreover, we note that the Supreme Court has re-
cently granted certiorari to resolve the conflict in the
circuits over the meaning of the term “independent
judgment” in Section 2(11), as well as the issue of which
party has the burden of proof in establishing supervisory
status. NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc.,
S.Ct. No. 99–1815 (cert granted September 26, 2000).
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941).
We also find that there are no issues warranting a hear-
ing with respect to the Union’s request for information.
The Respondent admits that by letters dated January 19
and June 28, 2000, the Union requested that the Respon-
dent furnish it with the following information with re-
spect to the service unit and the LPN unit:
1. A list of current employees, including their
names, dates of hire, rates of pay, job classification,
department, last known address, and phone number;
2. A copy of all current company personnel poli-
cies and procedures which relate to or have an effect
on bargaining unit employees, including but not lim-
332 NLRB No. 133
SUNRISE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER 1305
ited to, leave of absence, shifts, starting times, hiring
rules, safety rules, vacation, holidays, and overtimes;
3. A copy of all company fringe benefit plans, in-
cluding pension, profit sharing, severance, stock ini-
tiative, health insurance, apprenticeship, training, le-
gal services, child care, or any other plans which re-
late to the employees, and where applicable, copies
of summary plan descriptions for such plans;
4. Copies of all current job descriptions for bar-
gaining unit employees;
5. Copies of any company wage and salary plans,
including schedules for employees on incentive jobs;
6. Copies of OSHA 200 logs for the past 3 years;
7. The Cost Report files with the AHCA for the
last 3 years;
8. Any and all agreements signed with all sub-
contractors that relate to the bargaining unit employ-
ees’ jobs, wages, benefits, and working conditions.
In its answer, the Respondent admits only that “cer-
tain” of this information is necessary and relevant for
purposes of collective bargaining. We find that with the
exception of the cost and subcontracting information
requested in items 7 and 8, the foregoing types of infor-
mation are presumptively relevant for purposes of collec-
tive bargaining and must be furnished on request.1 The
Respondent has not attempted to rebut the relevance of
the information requested in Items 1–6, and we therefore

1 Zeta Consumer Products Corp., 326 NLRB 293 (1998) (OSHA
200 logs); Trustees of Masonic Hall, 261 NLRB 436 (1982) (compen-
sation and employment information); Mobay Chemical Corp., 233
NLRB 109 (1977) (same).
Item 7’s reference to the “Cost Report files with the AHCA” is not
further explained in the record, but it appears that the Union was seek-
ing financial information. The Board has held that financial informa-
tion is not presumptively relevant and that the union must therefore
demonstrate the relevance of the information. See Troy Hills Nursing
Home, 326 NLRB 1465 fn.2 (1998). Similarly, the Board has held that
the subcontracting information sought in item 8 is not presumptively
relevant. Associated Ready Mixed Concrete, 318 NLRB 318 (1995),
enfd. 108 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1997), followed in Dexter Fastener
Technologies, 321 NLRB 612– 613 fn. 2 (1996).
Here, neither the complaint nor the Motion for Summary Judgment
explain why the Respondent had an obligation to provide the cost and
subcontracting information. Based on Troy Hills and Associated Ready
Mixed, we deny the General Counsel’s Motion for Summary Judgment
with respect to the information requested in items 7 and 8, and we
remand those issues to the Regional Director for further appropriate
action. In the event that the subcontracting information issue proceeds
to hearing, the parties are specifically requested to brief the question of
the continued validity of the Associated Ready Mixed line of precedent.
See Torrington Industries, 307 NLRB 809, 810–811 (1992) (holding
that in cases factually similar to Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.
NLRB, 379 U.S. 203 (1964), a decision to subcontract bargaining unit
work is a mandatory subject of bargaining), and Overnite Transporta-
tion Co., 330 NLRB 1275 (2000), enf. denied in relevant part Nos. 00–
3421 and 00–1744 (3d Cir. Nov. 8, 2000).
find that no material issues of fact exist with respect to
the Respondent’s refusal to furnish this information.
Accordingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judg-
ment, and we will order the Respondent to bargain and to
furnish the requested information, with the exception of
the cost and subcontracting information requested in
Items 7 and 8.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
The Respondent, a Georgia corporation, is engaged in
operation of an extended care nursing home at its facility
in Sunrise, Florida. During the past 12 months prior to
issuance of the complaint, the Respondent, in conducting
its business operations, derived gross revenues in excess
of $100,000 and during that same period of time pur-
chased and received at its Sunrise, Florida facility goods
valued in excess of $10,000 directly from points located
outside the state of Florida. We find that the Respondent
is an employer engaged in commerce within the meaning
of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act and that the Union is a
labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of
the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the elections held May 9, 1997, the Union
was certified on July 22, 1999, as the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of the employees in the
following appropriate units:
THE SERVICE UNIT
All full-time and regular part-time certified nursing as-
sistants, dietary employees, cooks, maintenance em-
ployees, medical records employees, unit secretaries,
activities employees, social services assistants and cen-
tral supply employees employed by the Employer at its
Sunrise, Florida facility; excluding all other employees,
housekeeping employees, licensed practical nurses, of-
fice clerical employees, occupational therapists, regis-
tered nurses, physical therapists, guards and supervisors
as defined in the Act.
and
THE LPN UNIT
All full-time and regular part-time licensed practical
nurse (LPN) charge nurses employed by the Employer
at its Sunrise, Florida facility; excluding certified nurs-
ing assistants (CNA’s), dietary employees, cooks,
maintenance employees, medical records employees,
unit secretaries, activities employees, social services as-
sistants, central supply employees, registered nurses,
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 1306
office clerical employees, occupational and physical
therapists, watchmen, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act, and all other employees.
The Union continues to be the exclusive representative
under Section 9(a) of the Act.2
B. Refusal to Bargain
Since January 19, 2000, the Union has requested the
Respondent to bargain and to furnish information with
respect to both the service unit and the LPN unit, and,
since January 19, 2000, the Respondent has refused. We
find that this refusal constitutes an unlawful refusal to
bargain in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By refusing on and after January 19, 2000, to recog-
nize and bargain with the Union as the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of employees in the ser-
vice and LPN units and to furnish the Union requested
information, the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor
practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Sec-
tion 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union, and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement. We also shall order the Respon-
dent to furnish the Union the information requested by
letters dated January 19 and June 28, 2000, with the ex-
ception of the cost and subcontracting information.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by the law, we shall construe the initial period of the cer-
tification as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB
226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert.
denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); Burnett Construction Co.,
149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57 (10th
Cir. 1965).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Richmond Health Care d/b/a Sunrise Health

2 As alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer, on June 13,
2000, in Cases 12–AC–37 and 12–AC–38, the Regional Director for
Region 12 of the Board, pursuant to stipulations executed by the Re-
spondent and the Union, amended the certifications issued by the Board
in Cases 12–RC–8064 and 12–RC–8065, respectively, to substitute the
Union as the certified union with respect to the service unit and the
LPN unit, respectively.
and Rehabilitation Center, Sunrise, Florida, its officers,
agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Refusing to bargain with 1115 Florida Division of
1199, Service Employees International Union, AFL–
CIO, CLC, as the exclusive bargaining representative of
the employees in the bargaining unit, and refusing to
furnish the Union information that is relevant and neces-
sary to its role as the exclusive bargaining representative
of the unit employees.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the following appro-
priate units on terms and conditions of employment, and
if an understanding is reached, embody the understand-
ing in a signed agreement:

All full-time and regular part-time certified nursing as-
sistants, dietary employees, cooks, maintenance em-
ployees, medical records employees, unit secretaries,
activities employees, social services assistants and cen-
tral supply employees employed by the Employer at its
Sunrise, Florida facility; excluding all other employees,
housekeeping employees, licensed practical nurses, of-
fice clerical employees, occupational therapists, regis-
tered nurses, physical therapists, guards, and supervi-
sors as defined in the Act.

(b) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the following appro-
priate units on terms and conditions of employment, and
if an understanding is reached, embody the understand-
ing in a signed agreement:

All full-time and regular part-time licensed practical
nurse (LPN) charge nurses employed by the Employer
at its Sunrise, Florida facility; excluding certified nurs-
ing assistants (CNA’s), dietary employees, cooks,
maintenance employees, medical records employees,
unit secretaries, activities employees, social services as-
sistants, central supply employees, registered nurses,
office clerical employees, occupational and physical
therapists, watchmen, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act, and all other employees.

(c) Furnish the Union information it requested on
January 19 and June 28, 2000, with the exception of the
cost and subcontracting information.
SUNRISE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER 1307
(d) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Sunrise, Florida, copies of the attached no-
tice marked “Appendix.”3 Copies of the notice, on forms
provided by the Regional Director for Region 12 after
being signed by the Respondent’s authorized representa-
tive, shall be posted by the Respondent and maintained
for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places including
all places where notices to employees are customarily
posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respon-
dent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or
covered by any other material. In the event that, during
the pendency of these proceedings, the Respondent has
gone out of business or closed the facility involved in
these proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and
mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all cur-
rent employees and former employees employed by the
Respondent at any time since January 19, 2000.
(e) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered us to
post and abide by this notice.
WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain with 1115 Florida
Division of 1199, Service Employees International Un-
ion, AFL–CIO, CLC as the exclusive representative of
the employees in the bargaining unit, and WE WILL
NOT refuse to furnish the Union information that is rele-

3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States Court of
Appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”

vant and necessary to its role as the exclusive bargaining
representative of the unit employees.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put
in writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and
conditions of employment for our employees in the bar-
gaining unit:

All full-time and regular part-time certified nursing as-
sistants, dietary employees, cooks, maintenance em-
ployees, medical records employees, unit secretaries,
activities employees, social services assistants and cen-
tral supply employees employed by us at our Sunrise,
Florida facility; excluding all other employees, house-
keeping employees, licensed practical nurses, office
clerical employees, occupational therapists, registered
nurses, physical therapists, guards, and supervisors as
defined in the Act.

WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put
in writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and
conditions of employment for our employees in the bar-
gaining unit:

All full-time and regular part-time licensed practical
nurse (LPN) charge nurses employed by us at our Sun-
rise, Florida facility; excluding certified nursing assis-
tants (CNA’s), dietary employees, cooks, maintenance
employees, medical records employees, unit secretar-
ies, activities employees, social services assistants, cen-
tral supply employees, registered nurses, office clerical
employees, occupational and physical therapists,
watchmen, guards, and supervisors as defined in the
Act, and all other employees.

WE WILL furnish the Union the information it re-
quested on January 19 and June 28, 2000, with the ex-
ception of the cost and subcontracting information.
SUNRISE HEALTH & REHABILITATION
CENTER