Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 31, 194564 N.L.R.B. 650 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter Of SULLIVAN DRYDOCK & REPAIR CORP. and INDUSTRIAL UNION OF MARINE AND SHIPBUILDING WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 13, C. I. O. Case No. 2-R-5672.-Decided October 31, 1945 Mr. J. Read Smith, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for the Company. Mr. William L. Standard, by Ruth H. Saslow, of New York City, for the Union. Mr. Stanley B. Korengold, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by Industrial Union of America, Local 13, C. I% 0., herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., Brooklyn, New York, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Jerome I. Macht, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at New York City, on July 26, 1945. The Company and the Union appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross- examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prej- udicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. TIIE BUSINESS OF TILE COMPANY Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp. is a New York corporation lo- cated at Brooklyn, New York. It is engaged in manufacturing pro- peller wheels and repairing and converting ships for the United States Army, the Navy, the Maritime Commission, and for commercial cus- tomers. The ships repaired and converted by the Company during 64 N L It . B., No. 110 650 0 SULLIVAN DRYDOCK & REPAIR CORP. 651 the past year were valued in excess of $500,000, and were used in intercoastal commerce. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Local 13, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative of certain of the Company's em- ployees until the Union has been certified by the Board in an appro- priate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate? We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, in substantial accord with a stipulation of the parties, that all storeroom and toolroom employees of the Company at its Brooklyn yard, excluding the head storeroom keepers and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively rec- ommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purpose of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. ' The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 4 dues record cards, that all 4 cards were dated April 2, 1945, and that there are 13 employees in the alleged appro- priate unit . At the hearing the Union submitted to the Trial Examiner 7 additional cards, of which S were dues record cards and 2 were membership and authorization cards. Of these 7 additional cards , 5 bore the names of persons appearing on the Company's pay roll. -652 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Sullivan Drydock and Repair Corp., Brooklyn, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because -they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the 'election, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Local 13, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. a MR. GERARD D. REU.rr took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation