Stewart-Warner Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 10, 194243 N.L.R.B. 1233 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter Of STEWART DIE CASTING DIVISION OF STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION and UNITED AUTOMOBILE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 298, .C. I. O. Case No. R-40'75.Decided September 10,194 Jurisdiction : metal castings and ordnance materials manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal to accord petitioner recognition ; persons whose employee status was in dispute allowed to vote subject to challenge and their ballots directed to be impounded awaiting further determination by the Board ; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all hourly and piece-rate produc- tion and maintenance employees, excluding supervisory and office employees, draftsmen, and watchmen ; agreement as to. Mr. F. H. Towner, of Chicago, Ill., for the Company. . Owens & Owens, by Mr. Thomas L. Owens, of Chicago, Ill., and Meyers & Meyers,'by Mr. Ben Meyers, of Chicago, Ill., for the Union. Mr. "Louis Cokin and Mr. J. Benson Saks, of counsel to the Board. DECISION - AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION, STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petition duly filed by United Automobile Workers of America, Local 298, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen, concerning the representation of employees of Stewart Die Casting Division of Stewart-Warner Corporation, Chicago, Illi- nois, herein called the Company,'the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Lester Asher, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois, on July 28, 1942. The Company and the Union appeared, partici- pated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed., 43 N. L. R. B No. 193. 481039-42-vo1 43-78 1233 1234 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Stewart-Warner Corporation is a Virginia corporation engaged in manufacturing enterprises in various States of the United States and in Canada. The present controversy involves only the Stewart Die Casting Division of the corporation, }which is located at Chicago, Illinois. At this plant the Company is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of metal castings, tools and similar products, and in the manufacture of ordnance materials under contracts with'the United States Government. During the year 1941 the Company used at this plant raw materials from sources outside the State of Illinois approxi- mating $500,000 in value. During the same period the Company sold products valued at approximately $2,000,000, over 30 percent of which represented sales of goods to places outside the State of Illinois. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED United Automobile Workers of America, Local 298, is ,,l, labor organi- zation affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations. It admits to membership employees of the Company. II'I. THE QUESTION 'CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On December 4, 1941, the Union addressed.a letter to the Company requesting recognition as sole bargaining agent for employees of the Company in an alleged 'appropriate unit. The Cbmpany denied the request. A report of the Regional Director, introduced in evidence at the hearing, shows that the Union represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.' We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of. this company, within the meaning of Section 9 .(c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, in accordance with the agreement of the parties, that all hourly and piece-rate production and maintenance employees, exclud- ing supervisory and office employees, draftsmen, and watchmen, consti- tute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. 1 The Regional Director's statement shows that the Union submitted 255 cards, all of which contain apparently genuine signatures and bear dates between January and De- cember 1941. The Company declined to submit its pay roll against which to check these signatures. STEWART DIE CASTING DIVISION 1235 V. DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the employees in the appropriate unit. The Company and the Union are in disagreement as to the eligibility of certain persons to vote. The Company contends that these persons, former employees, are not eligible to vote because they are no longer employed by the Company and are not entitled to employment by it. The Union contends that these persons are still employees 'of the Com- pany or, in the alternative, entitled to employment by it and as such are employees within the iileaning of the Act and eligible to vote. The following are' the categories of persons whose eligibility`'to vote is in dispute.' 1. Those persons on a preferential hiring list now maintained by the Company pursuant to court decree enforcing a previous order of the Board.' 2. Those persons to whom the Company addressed letters. requesting them to return to work. . 3., Those persons who did not receive such letters to return to work but who are covered by the previous decision and order of the Board.3 4. Those personswha returned to work in answer to the Com- pany's letter_ but were not offered substantially equivalent em- ployment. 5. Those persons who returned to work and in a'short time were discharged as inefficient or violators of Company rules. 6. Those persons offered reinstatement but refused to return be- cause of alleged discriminatory action on the part of the Company with respect to other employees. 7. Those persons who, though in receipt of the_ Company's letter, did not return to work because at that time they were not informed of the true facts, but who would return to work at present on re- ceipt of another offer from the Company. We shall direct that these persons be allowed to vote, subject to chal- lenge, and that their ballots be impounded awaiting the further deter- mination of the Board. . The Company and the Union are also in disagreement 'as to the pay- roll date to be used in the determination of eligibilty to vote. The Company requests a current pay roll while the Union requests that pay roll in effect nearest to July 28, 1942. Under all the circumstances, we 2 Stewart Die Ca,tmg Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 114 F. (2d) 849 C. C A. 7) 1 940; enfoicing as modified Matter of Stewart Die Casting Corporation and United Automobile Workers of America, Local 298, 14 N L R B 872 a Matter of Stewart Die Casting Corporation and United Automobile Workers of America, Local 298, 14 N. -L R B. 872. '1236 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD shall direct that an- election be held within thirty (30) days from the date of our Direction of Election and that persons eligible to vote in such- election shall be those employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period nearest July 28, 1942, and the persons in the categories mentioned above, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part -of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Stewart Die Cast- ing Division of Stewart-Warner Corporation, Chicago, Illinois, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible but not later than thirty (30) days from the, date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of Said Rules and Regula- tions, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the Pay-roll period nearest July 28, 1942, including those persons in the categories set forth in Section V, above, and under the limitations set forth therein, and in- cluding any such employees who did not work during said' pay-roll period because they were ill, or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding any, who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to-be represented by United Auto- mobile Workers of America, Local 298, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, for the purpose of collective ,bargaining. Chairman MILLIS took no part in the consideration of the ' above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation