Steven W. VanDesande, Sr., Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 29, 2005
01a52605 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 29, 2005)

01a52605

09-29-2005

Steven W. VanDesande, Sr., Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Steven W. VanDesande, Sr. v. United States Postal Service

01A52605

September 29, 2005

.

Steven W. VanDesande, Sr.,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A52605

Agency No. 4H 330 1138-96

Hearing No. 150-2000-0841X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.

For the following reasons, it is the decision of the Commission to

MODIFY the final agency decision with regard to attorneys' fees and

relief sought in pursuing the appeal in this case.

The complainant was a Letter Carrier employed at the agency's Promenade

Station at Hialeah, Florida. The complainant alleged that the agency

retaliated against him when he was subjected to continued harassment

and retaliation. On December 10, 2001, the Administrative Judge issued

a Default Judgment against the agency with regard to the complainant's

consolidated complaints. Following a damages hearing and by decision

dated September 4, 2003, the AJ awarded the complainant certain

specified relief, including attorney's fees, but the AJ did not award the

complainant with all of the relief requested. Both parties appealed. The

Commission consolidated the appeals under appeal 07A40037. On September

28, 2004, the Commission modified the AJ's award of compensatory

damages and reversed the agency's final order that rejected the AJ's

judgment against the agency in Steven W. VanDesande, Sr. v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 07A40037 (September 28, 2004)

and other relief awarded.<1> The Commission remanded the matter to the

agency for compliance.

The complainant seeks an additional $16,537.50 in attorney fees at an

hourly rate of $225 for work on his previous appeal to the Commission

and the separate and distinct cross-appeal. On January 18, 2005, the

agency issued it final action reducing the requested fee petition by 30%

and awarded $11,537.00 in attorney's fees.<2> The agency contends that the

complainant's attorney claimed excessive hours and the complainant did not

prevail on the issues for which he cross-appealed. This appeal followed.

We are not persuaded that the claimed hours were excessive. We note

that the research time (3 hours and 35 minutes and 4 hours and 20 minutes

respectively) for the research of more than sixty cases is not excessive.

We also note the claimed research was undertaken on the issue of attorney

fees, which had not been previously undertaken. Moreover, we note that

the complainant was a prevailing party, as evidenced by the Commission's

finding of discrimination which was a reversal of the FAD.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, we find that the complainant's

request for attorney's fees is supported by the record before us. It is

the decision of the Commission to MODIFY the agency's final order which

denied the complainant the full amount of the requested attorney's fees

for his previous appeal. Accordingly, the agency is directed to take

corrective action in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (D0403)

To the extent that it has not already done so, the agency is ordered to

take the following remedial action:

Within 30 calendar days of the date that this decision becomes final,

the agency will pay complainant $16,537.50 in attorney's fees.

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H0900)

If complainant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(1)(iii)), he/she is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the complaint.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall be paid

by the agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees

to the agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for

attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court

appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you

to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security.

See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �

2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of

1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the

request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for

an attorney does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 29, 2005

__________________

Date

1 On September 4, 2003, after conducting an extensive hearing on the issue

of damages, the AJ issued a decision finding that the complainant was

entitled to the make whole relief, which we affirmed in substantial part.

Our order, affirming the AJ award, provided for expert witness fees and

attorney's fees and costs. The order also permitted the complainant to

seek an award of reasonable attorney's fees to which he may be entitled.

2 The complainant notes that a 30% reduction from the $16,537.50 results

in $11,576.25, not the $11,537.00 actually awarded by the agency.