0120161909
08-11-2016
Stephen F,1 Complainant, v. Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.
.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Stephen F,1
Complainant,
v.
Ashton B. Carter,
Secretary,
Department of Defense
(Defense Commissary Agency),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120161909
Agency No. DECA000292016
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated April 7, 2016, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Commissary Contract Monitor at the Agency's AFB Commissary in Charleston, South Carolina.
On March 1, 2016, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian) and color (white) when: (1) on April 9, 2015, his supervisor directed him to sign off on training that he did not attend and denied him proper training on filling out a time sheet; (2) on June 22, 2015, he felt intimidated when the Store Director made an inappropriate comment about a coworker during a meeting; (3) on June 22, 2015, and August 26, 2015, his supervisor changed his work schedules that included errors and he had to work outside normal duty hours; and (4) on October 15, 2015, he was issued a memorandum for termination during his probationary period.
The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.
Here, the record discloses that the latest alleged discriminatory event occurred on October 5, 2015, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until December 28, 2015, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period.
EEOC regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency or the Commission.
In the instant case, the record contains a sworn statement that an EEO poster was on a bulletin board at the facility where Complainant was employed. The poster had the time limits for contacting an EEO counselor and information on initiating the EEO process. It is well-established by Commission precedent that EEO posters on display in the workplace constitute a presumption of constructive notice of EEO time limits. See Drake v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120131871 (August 5, 2013); Tutwittler v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121325 (April 18, 2013); Pride v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930134 (August 19, 1993). Here, Complainant has failed to rebut this presumption.
On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0416)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The requests may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 11, 2016
__________________
Date
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0120161909
2
0120161909