Stanley Knight Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 5, 194665 N.L.R.B. 813 (N.L.R.B. 1946) Copy Citation In the Matter of STANLEY KNIGHT CORPORATION and UNITED AUTO- MOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O. Case No. 13-RD268.Decided February 5, 1946 Fyffe & Clarke, by 31r. John Harrington, of Chicago, Ill., for the Company. Meyers cC Meyers, by Mr. Ben Meyers, of Chicago, Ill., for the C. I. O. Mr. Albert G. Fox, of Chicago, Ill., for the A. F. L. Mr. John H. Wood, Jr., of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon an amended petition duly filed by United Automobile, Air- craft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the CIO, alleging that a question affecting commerce had alaisen concerning the representation of employees of Stanley Knight Corporation, Chicago, Illinois, herein called the Company, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Leon A. Rosell, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois, on November 8, 1945. The Company, the CIO, and Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union 115, A. F. L., herein called the A. F. L., appeared and partici- pated.' All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bear- ing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error, and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: "The A. F. L. appeared solely for the purpose of protecting its contract interest In journeymen sheet metal workers and registered apprentices who are employed by the Company at its plant 65 N. L. R B, No. 141. 813 814 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Stanley Knight Corporation is an Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture of soda fountains at its sole plant located at Chicago, Illinois. During the year 1944, the Company purchased materials valued in excess of $100,000, approximately 50 percent of which was shipped to its plant from points outside the State of Illinois. Dur- ing the same period, the Company manufactured goods valued in ex- cess of $200,000, of which approximately 50 percent was shipped from its plant to points outside the State of Illinois. We find that the Company is engaged in commerce within the mean- ing of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Work- ers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organiza- tions, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to grant recognition to the CIO as the exclusive bargaining representative of certain of its employees until it has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear- ing, indicates that the CIO represents a substantial number of em- ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate? We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The CIO contends that all production and maintenance employees of the Company, excluding office and clerical employees, journey- men sheet-metal workers and registered apprentices, and supervisors, constitute an appropriate unit. As already indicated, the journey- men sheet-metal workers and registered apprentices are covered by a contract between the Company and the A. F. L. The Company takes no position on the appropriateness of the foregoing unit. 2 The Field Examiner reported that the CIO submitted 23 authorization cards, and that there were 31 employees in the unit alleged to be appropriate. STANLEY KNIGHT CORPORATION 815 We find that all production and maintenance employees of the Com- pany, excluding office and clerical employees, journeymen sheet-metal workers and registered apprentices, and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec- tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. TUE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela- tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIIu c'r1E1) that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Stanley Knight Corporation, Chicago, Illinois, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vaca- tion or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been dis- charged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Im- plement Workers of America, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective ba rgaining. 671)100-46-x of 65--53 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation