Stanley Harrison, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 13, 2002
01A22918_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 13, 2002)

01A22918_r

08-13-2002

Stanley Harrison, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Stanley Harrison v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A22918

August 13, 2002

.

Stanley Harrison,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22918

Agency No. BGABFO0203C0240

DECISION

Complainant initiated an appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 3, 2002, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In his

complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on

the bases of race, sex, color, and reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

In July 2001, complainant was accused of destroying bone tissue;

Complainant was denied promotion for three and one-half years, which

hampered complainant's promotion for a vacancy in the Hospital Logistics

Branch and Directorate of Logistics; and

Complainant seeks restoration of all sick and annual leave for the period

he was sick and in the hospital.

The agency dismissed claims 1 and 3 for failure to state claims, pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The agency dismissed claim 2 as untimely,

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,

.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined

an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which

there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

The Commission has previously held that being subject to an internal

investigation does not render an individual aggrieved under the EEOC

regulations. See Johnson v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request

No. 05960699 (April 16, 1998); Mattocks v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05950549 (August 29, 1996).

The Commission concurs with the agency in finding that complainant was

not aggrieved when his supervisor told him (in connection with the loss of

$11,000 bone tissue for transplant) that "somebody would have to pay"and

complainant became the subject of an agency investigation into the loss.

Further, we find that complainant's claim 3 is a requested remedy, and

does not state a claim for relief. The agency's dismissal of claims 1

and 3 pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) was proper.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)

day limitation period is triggered. See Howard v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation

is not triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination,

but before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have

become apparent.

EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend

the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the

time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know

and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or

personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented

by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within

the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency

or the Commission.

After review of the complaint, complainant's statement on appeal and the

entire record, we find complainant has not presented any circumstances

that warrant an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO counseling

regarding his claim that his promotion was delayed for over three years

and in turn, he was denied promotion to a vacant position in 1999.

The agency's dismissal of claim 2 for untimely EEO contact was proper.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the agency's dismissal of the complaint for the

reasons stated herein.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 13, 2002

__________________

Date