St. Regis Paper Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 7, 1957118 N.L.R.B. 1560 (N.L.R.B. 1957) Copy Citation 1560 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (b) All production and maintenance employees including inspec- tors, shipping and receiving clerks, stock handlers, and truckdrivers, but excluding office clerical employees, professional employees, em- ployees included in group (a) above, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act. If a majority of the employees in voting group (a) select the Welders Union, that group will be taken to have indicated their desire to constitute a separate bargaining unit, which the Board, under those circumstances, finds to be appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining, and the Regional Director conducting the elections is hereby instructed to issue a certification of representatives to such union for such unit. In that event, if a majority of employees in voting group (b) select the Aircraft Workers or the Intervenor, then the Regional Director is instructed to issue a certification of representatives to the winning union for a unit of such employees, which the Board under the circumstances finds to be appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining. However, if a majority of the employees in voting group (a) do not vote for the Welders Union, such group will be appropriately included in the same unit with the employees in voting group (b) and their votes will be pooled with those in that voting group.' If a majority of employees in the pooled group select either the Aircraft Workers or the Intervenor, the Regional Director is instructed to issue a certification of representatives to the winning union for such unit, which under such circumstances the Board finds to be appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining. [Text of Direction of Elections omitted from publication.] sought to include specifically apprentices and trainees . The record shows , however, that the Employer employs no such employees . As for the spot welders , the record shows that they work on fully automatic equipment which they cannot regulate , that their work is not skilled, and that they are not certified. a If the votes are pooled , they are to be tallied in the following manner : The votes for the welders Union shall be counted as valid votes , but neither for nor against a union seeking the production and maintenance employees ; all other votes are to be accorded their face value, whether for representation by a union or for no union. St. Regis Paper Company and Stationary Engineers Local #86, International Union of Operating Engineers , AFL-CIO, Peti- tioner. Case No. 1-RC-49418. October 7, 195' SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES Pursuant to a Decision and Direction of Election issued by the Board on July 29, 1957,1 an election by secret ballot was conducted 1 Not reported in printed volumes of Board Decisions and Orders. ...t8 NLRB No.. 21-6. ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY 1561 on August 13, 1957, under the direction and supervision of the Re gional Director for the First Region of the National Labor Relations Board among the employees in the unit found appropriate by the Board. At the close of the election the parties were furnished with a tally of ballots which shows that, of approximately 19 eligible voters, 9 cast ballots for the Petitioner, 8 cast ballots for Local Union No. 534, United Papermakers and Paperworkers,2 AFL-CIO, and 1 ballot was challenged. The challenged ballot being determinative of the results of the election, the Regional Director, pursuant to Section 102.61 of the Rules and Regulations of the Board, caused an investigation to be made and on August 23, 1957, issued and served on the parties his report on challenged ballot, in which he recommended that the chal- lenge to the ballot be sustained and that Petitioner be certified as the exclusive bargaining agent of the employees in the unit found by the Board to be appropriate. Thereafter, the Papermakers filed timely exceptions to the Regional Director's report, and Petitioner filed a memorandum in support of the report. Pursuant to Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chair- man Leedom and Members Murdock and Rodgers]. The Regional Director found that Lawrence was employed by the Employer on July 9, 1953, as a first-class electrician, a position outside the unit found herein to be appropriate; that on January 4, 1957, Lawrence was awarded the position of powerhouse operator with seniority in that position from June 20, 1956, the approximate date of his application for that position, but that, at the time of the elec- tion on August 13,, 1957, Lawrence was still. working as an electrician because the Employer had not as yet obtained a replacement for him in the electrician's job. The Regional Director concluded therefrom that Lawrence was ineligible to vote because he was not actually working in the appro- priate unit during the payroll eligibility period and was not absent for one of the reasons set out in the Direction of Election. The Papermakers does not dispute the facts as found by the Regional Director, but takes issue with his conclusions. As Lawrence was not actually working in the appropriate category in the unit during the payroll eligibility period and on the date of the election, we find him ineligible to vote. The fact that he was awarded the job in the appropriate category and was accruing senior- ity therein on the critical dates is insufficient reason to depart from a Herein referred to as " the Papermakers." 1562 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the Board's established voting eligibility rules.' Accordingly, like the Regional Director, we sustain the challenge to Lawrence's ballot. As the Petitioner has received a majority of the valid ballots cast in the election, we shall certify the Petitioner as the collective- bargaining representative of the employees in the appropriate unit. [The Board certified Stationary Engineers Local #86, Interna- tional Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, as the designated collective-bargaining representative of the employees in the appro- priate unit.] 3 Cf. Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation , 116 NLRB 552 , 553, wherein the Board interpreted a unit finding excluding temporary employees as making ineligible an employee who was working as a temporary during the payroll eligibility period, although he had already been promised a permanent job which was to take effect and did take effect before the election date. Pet Dairy Products Company and D. H. Edwards, Petitioner and Milk and Ice Cream Drivers and Dairy Employees, Local Union No. 23, International Brotherhood of Teamsters , Chauf- feurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America , AFL-CIO. Case No. 11-RD-68. October 8, 1957 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before John M. Dyer, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.' Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has delegated its powers in-connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Leedom and Members Murdock and Rodgers]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The Petitioner, an employee of the Employer, asserts that the Union is no longer the bargaining representative, as defined in Section 9 (a) of the Act, of certain employees of the Employer. 3. No question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, for the following reasons: The petition sought a decertification election in a unit of employees at the Employer's Greenville, South Carolina, plant.2 The Union 1 The Union 's motion to dismiss the petition , which was referred by the hearing officer to the Board, is granted-for the reasons stated infra. 2 The petition described a unit of "office, clerical, wholesale milk delivery, retail milk delivery , ice cream delivery , shipping , ice cream production , milk processing and storage, 118 NLRB No. 213. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation