South Water Market, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 28, 201313-CA-103435 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 28, 2013) Copy Citation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD SOUTH WATER MARKET, INC. and Case 13-CA-103435 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 703 ORDER The petitions to revoke subpoenas duces tecum B-710578 and B-710579, filed by Michael De La Rosa and Ciro Diosdado, respectively, are denied. The subpoenas seek information relevant to the matter under investigation and describe with sufficient particularity the evidence sought, as required by Section 11(1) of the Act and Section 102.31(b) of the Board’s Rules and Regulations. Further, the Petitioners have failed to establish any other legal basis for revoking the subpoenas.1 See generally NLRB v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc., 102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996); NLRB v. Carolina Food Processors, Inc., 81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996). Dated, Washington, D.C., June 28, 2013. MARK GASTON PEARCE, CHAIRMAN RICHARD F. GRIFFIN, JR., MEMBER SHARON BLOCK, MEMBER 1 The Petitioners argue that the subpoenas are void ab initio, because the Board does not have a valid quorum under NLRB v. Noel Canning, 705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013), cert. granted, 81 U.S.L.W. 3629 (U.S. June 24, 2013)(No. 12-1281). For the reasons stated in Bloomingdale’s, Inc., 359 NLRB No. 113 (2013), we reject this argument. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation