Solid Case Work

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

May 12, 2005

344 N.L.R.B. 75 (N.L.R.B. 2005)

344 NLRB No. 75
Joe Kelly and Jeff Sideman, d/b/a Solid Case Work
and Indiana/Kentucky Regional Council of Car-
penters, a/w United Brotherhood of Carpenters
and Joiners of America, AFL–CIO. Case 25–
CA–29354
May 12, 2005
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN BATTISTA AND MEMBERS LIEBMAN AND
SCHAUMBER
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint. Upon a charge filed by the
Union on September 30, 2004, the General Counsel is-
sued the complaint on February 11, 2005, against Joe
Kelly and Jeff Sideman, d/b/a Solid Case Work, the Re-
spondent, alleging that it has violated Section 8(a)(1) and
(5) of the Act. The Respondent failed to file an answer
On March 22, 2005, the General Counsel filed a Mo-
tion for Default Judgment with the Board. On March 23,
2005, the Board issued an order transferring the proceed-
ing to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the
motion should not be granted. The Respondent filed no
response. The allegations in the motion are therefore
undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in a complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively stated
that unless an answer was filed by February 25, 2005, all
the allegations in the complaint could be considered ad-
mitted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Gen-
eral Counsel’s motion disclose that the Region, by letters
dated February 28 and March 8, 2005, notified the Re-
spondent that unless an answer was received by March 7,
2005, and March 15, 2005, respectively, a motion for
default judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s motion for default judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent has been owned
jointly by Joe Kelly and Jeff Sideman, partners, doing
business as Solid Case Work, with an office and place of
business in McCordsville, Indiana (the Respondent’s
facility), where it has been engaged as a carpentry con-
tractor in the construction business.
During the 12-month period ending September 30,
2004, the Respondent, in conducting its business opera-
tions described above, provided services valued in excess
of $50,000 for Wolverine Interiors, Inc., an enterprise
located in the State of Michigan.
At all material times, Wolverine Interiors, Inc., a cor-
poration with an office and place of business in Sanford,
Michigan, has been engaged in the manufacture, sale,
and installation of wood cabinets and related products.
During the 12-month period ending September 30,
2004, Wolverine Interiors, Inc., in conducting its busi-
ness operations described above, sold and shipped from
its Sanford, Michigan facility goods valued in excess of
$50,000 directly to points outside the State of Michigan.
At all material times, Wolverine Interiors, Inc. has
been an enterprise directly engaged in interstate com-
merce.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act, and that Indiana/Kentucky Regional
Council of Carpenters, a/w United Brotherhood of Car-
penters and Joiners of America, AFL–CIO (the Union) is
a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5)
of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, Joe Kelly and Jeff Sideman have
been general partners and owners of the Respondent, and
have been supervisors of the Respondent within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act, and agents of the
Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the
Act.
The employees of the Respondent who are described
in article I of the collective-bargaining agreement be-
tween The Building Contractors Association of Fort
Wayne, Inc. and the Union, which by its terms is effec-
tive from June 1, 2003 through May 31, 2006 (the unit),
constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the
Act.
Since about April 3, 2001, and at all material times, the
Union has been the designated exclusive bargaining rep-
resentative of the unit, and since then the Union has been
recognized as the representative by the Respondent. This
recognition has been embodied in a recognition agree-
ment dated April 3, 2001, and successive collective-
bargaining agreements, the most recent of which is effec-
tive by its terms from June 1, 2003 through May 31,
2006.
At all times since about April 3, 2001, based on Sec-
tion 9(a) of the Act, the Union has been the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
By letter dated September 15, 2004, the Union re-
quested that the Respondent furnish it with certain in-
formation concerning the unit employees. Specifically,
the Union’s letter stated:
On behalf of the Indiana/Kentucky Regional Council of
Carpenters, please supply this Office with the names,
addresses and wages of all bargaining unit employees
employed in the State of Indiana by Solid Case Work
from April 3, 2001 to date. The wage information
should be broken down by straight time hours, over-
time hours and fringe benefits paid for/owed on behalf
of each employee by job in this period and an identifi-
cation (customer name and location) of each job.
The information requested by the Union is necessary
for and relevant to, the Union’s performance of its duties
as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
the unit.
Since about September 15, 2004, the Respondent has
failed and refused to furnish the Union with the re-
quested information.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By failing and refusing to furnish the Union with the
information it requested in its September 15, 2004 letter,
the Respondent has failed and refused to bargain collec-
tively and in good faith with the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of its unit employees, and has
thereby engaged in unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(1) and (5) and
Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(1)
and (5) by failing and refusing to furnish the Union with
information that is relevant and necessary to its role as
the exclusive bargaining representative of the unit em-
ployees, we shall order the Respondent to furnish the
Union with the information it requested in its letter of
September 15, 2004.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Joe Kelly and Jeff Sideman, d/b/a Solid
Case Work, McCordsville, Indiana, its officers, agents,
successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to furnish Indiana/Kentucky
Regional Council of Carpenters, a/w United Brotherhood
of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL–CIO, with
information necessary for and relevant to the perform-
ance of its duties as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the employees of the Respondent who
are described in article I of the collective-bargaining
agreement between The Building Contractors Associa-
tion of Fort Wayne, Inc. and the Indiana/Kentucky Re-
gional Council of Carpenters, a/w United Brotherhood of
Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL–CIO, which by
its terms is effective from June 1, 2003 through May 31,
2006.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Furnish the Union with the information it requested
by letter dated September 15, 2004.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in McCordsville, Indiana, copies of the at-
tached notice marked “Appendix.”1 Copies of the notice,
on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region
25, after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized
representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and
maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous
places, including all places where notices to employees
are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken
by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not al-
tered, defaced, or covered by any other material. In the
event that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the
Respondent has gone out of business or closed the facil-
ity involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall
duplicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the no-
tice to all current employees and former employees em-
ployed by the Respondent at any time since September
15, 2004.
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to com-
ply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board
An Agency of the United States Government

1 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
SOLID CASE WORK 3
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to furnish Indi-
ana/Kentucky Regional Council of Carpenters, a/w
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of Amer-
ica, AFL–CIO, with information necessary for and rele-
vant to the performance of its duties as the exclusive col-
lective-bargaining representative of our employees de-
scribed in article I of the collective-bargaining agreement
between The Building Contractors Association of Fort
Wayne, Inc. and the Union, which by its terms is effec-
tive from June 1, 2003 through May 31, 2006.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL furnish the Union with the information it re-
quested by letter dated September 15, 2004.
JOE KELLY AND JEFF SIDEMAN, D/B/A SOLID
CASE WORK