Shirley M. Barringerv.United States Postal Service 01993071 July 13, 2000 . Shirley M. Barringer, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 13, 2000
01993071 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 13, 2000)

01993071

07-13-2000

Shirley M. Barringer v. United States Postal Service 01993071 July 13, 2000 . Shirley M. Barringer, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Shirley M. Barringer v. United States Postal Service

01993071

July 13, 2000

.

Shirley M. Barringer,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01993071

Agency No. 4B-120-0009-99

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's decision dated February 5, 1999,

dismissing claim (1) in complainant's complaint due to untimely EEO

Counselor contact is proper pursuant to the regulation set forth at 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (to be codified as and hereinafter cited as 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2)), however, the dismissal of claim (2) for failure

to state a claim is improper pursuant to the regulation set forth at 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (to be codified as and hereinafter cited as 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)).<1> In her complaint, complainant alleged that:

(1) since 1993, she was subjected to sexual harassment from her coworker,

forcing her to resign from her employment effective April 18, 1998;

and (2) on September 21, 1998, her request for reinstatement as Rural

Carrier Associate was denied.

In its decision, the agency stated that complainant's July 1998 EEO

contact, through an identified Post Office Operations Manager, was beyond

the 45-day time limit with regard to claim (1). The EEO Counselor's

Report indicates that complainant contacted an EEO Counselor with regard

to her complaint on October 29, 1998. With regard to complainant's claim

that she was not informed of the EEO process, the agency indicated that

it displayed EEO posters at the postal facility where complainant was

employed. The agency also submitted a Postmaster's affidavit confirming

that

the EEO posters, including the requisite time limit, were on display

at complainant's workplace when complainant was employed.<2> Thus,

the Commission finds that complainant had constructive knowledge of her

EEO rights, including the requisite time limit. Thompson v. Department

of the Army, EEOC Request 05910474 (September 12, 1991).

With regard to claim (2), the agency stated, in its decision, that the

Collective Bargaining Agreement between the agency and the National

Rural Letter Carriers' Association, Article 30.2, prohibited the

reinstatement of former non-career employees into vacant Rural Carrier

Associate positions. The agency indicated that since complainant was

formerly employed as a non-career Rural Carrier Associate, the alleged

denial of reinstatement failed to state a claim. Upon review, it appears

that the agency has improperly addressed the merits of claim (2) in a

procedural decision. See Lee v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05930220 (August 12, 1993) (citing Odoski v. Department of Energy,

EEOC Appeal No. 01901491 (April 16, 1990)). The Commission finds that

complainant is aggrieved as a result of the allegedly discriminatory

denial of reinstatement and, thus, states a claim within the purview of

the regulations.

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing claim (1) is AFFIRMED. The

agency's decision dismissing claim (2) is hereby REVERSED and claim (2)

is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with this

decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER (E0400)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claim in accordance with

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to the

complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall

issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue

a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's

request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The complainant also has

the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the

Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition

for enforcement. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be

codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. ��1614.407, 1614.408)

and 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the

right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance

with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29

C.F.R. ��1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a

civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline

stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant

files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint,

including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9,

1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director,

Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible

postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it

is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable

filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified

and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.604). The request or

opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0400)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER

ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until such

time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint. If you

file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE

PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING

THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to

do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or

"department" means the national organization, and not the local office,

facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to

reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will

terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court

appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to

file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e

et seq .; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791,

794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion

of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE

COMMISSION:

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 13, 2000

__________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2It is noted that although the agency's EEO poster, printed January

1990, contains outdated information with regard to the requisite time

limit to contact an EEO Counselor, i.e., 30 days, instead of 45 days,

complainant does not claim that her untimely EEO contact was due to

such information. The agency is hereby advised to update its EEO posters

in accordance with the current law, including the 45-day time limit to

contact an EEO Counselor.