Sheree Turnage, Complainant,v.Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 28, 2009
0120093023 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 28, 2009)

0120093023

10-28-2009

Sheree Turnage, Complainant, v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.


Sheree Turnage,

Complainant,

v.

Robert M. Gates,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093023

Agency No. 06AFIS046

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the agency's

dismissal of her complaint dated June 10, 2009. The agency noted that

the matter was being closed pursuant to the terms of the April 7, 2009

settlement agreement into which the parties entered. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.402; 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(b); and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

The settlement agreement provided, in pertinent part, that the agency

agreed to:

(1) Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Agreement,

rescind and remove from [complainant's] Official Personnel Files as well

as 'unofficial" personal files...

(2) Immediately voluntarily transfer complainant to the Facilities

Department of DMA Alexandria;

(3) Provide complainant an appraisal of at least "meets expectations"

in each job objective for her current job;

(4) Reinstate forty (40) hours annual leave within 30 days of the

effective date of this Agreement;

(5) This agreement becomes effective upon the date of the last

signature. Either party acknowledges that they have the right to withdraw

from this agreement by 5:00 p.m., Monday, April 13, 2009.

On April 8, 2009, the EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) issued his order

dismissing the matter with prejudice based on the settlement agreement

dated April 7, 2009. By e-mail dated April 13, 2009 at 4:49 p.m.,

complainant informed the agency that she was withdrawing from the

settlement agreement. On June 10, 2009, the agency dismissed the complaint

from processing based on the settlement agreement. Based on the agency's

dismissal, complainant filed an appeal with the Commission arguing that

she had withdrawn from the settlement agreement prior to the deadline

as evidenced by a copy of her e-mail dated April 13, 2009 at 4:49 p.m.

Therefore, her complaint should be processed.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(a) provides that any settlement

agreement knowingly and voluntarily agreed to by the parties, reached at

any stage of the complaint process, shall be binding on both parties.

The Commission has held that a settlement agreement constitutes a

contract between the employee and the agency, to which ordinary rules of

contract construction apply. See Herrington v. Department of Defense,

EEOC Request No. 05960032 (December 9, 1996). The Commission has further

held that it is the intent of the parties as expressed in the contract,

not some unexpressed intention, that controls the contract's construction.

Eggleston v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05900795

(August 23, 1990). In ascertaining the intent of the parties with regard

to the terms of a settlement agreement, the Commission has generally

relied on the plain meaning rule. See Hyon O v. United States Postal

Service, EEOC Request No. 05910787 (December 2, 1991). This rule states

that if the writing appears to be plain and unambiguous on its face,

its meaning must be determined from the four corners of the instrument

without resort to extrinsic evidence of any nature. See Montgomery

Elevator Co. v. Building Eng'g Servs. Co., 730 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1984).

In the instant case, we find that complainant timely contacted the

agency to withdraw from the settlement agreement within the time frame

stated within the agreement. As such, we find that the agency and the

AJ prematurely dismissed the complaint from processing. We note that the

settlement agreement required the agency to take various actions such as

restoring leave to complainant and to reassign complainant. The record

does not indicate the extent the agency has implemented the provisions

with the settlement agreement. Since complainant timely withdrew from

the settlement agreement, the agency shall rescind any action taken in

compliance with the settlement agreement and complainant will return to

the status quo. The matter shall also be returned to point where the

complaint process ceased. As such, the Commission remands the matter

back to the agency to forward the complaint back to the AJ.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, we REVERSE the agency's decision dismissing the complaint

at hand and REMAND the matter for further processing in accordance with

the ORDER below.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to process the remanded complaint at the point where

processing ceased. The agency shall insure that complainant returns any

benefits received. The agency will within fifteen (15) calendar days

shall issue complainant an acknowledgement letter informing complainant

of the processing of her complaint. Within thirty (30) calendar days,

the agency shall forward the matter to the EEOC Administrative Judge.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the file to the EEOC AJ must be sent

to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 28, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120093023

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120093023