Sheila Yarbrough, Complainant,v.John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Federal Bureau of Prisons) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 27, 2001
05A10178 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 27, 2001)

05A10178

04-27-2001

Sheila Yarbrough, Complainant, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Federal Bureau of Prisons) Agency.


Sheila Yarbrough v. Department of Justice

05A10178

April 27, 2001

.

Sheila Yarbrough,

Complainant,

v.

John Ashcroft,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

(Federal Bureau of Prisons)

Agency.

Request No. 05A10178

Appeal No. 01991871

Agency No. P-95-8791

Hearing No. 370-97-X2697

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The agency initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Sheila

Yarbrough v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01991871 (October

18, 2000). Complainant alleged that she was discriminated against on the

bases of her race (Black) and sex (female) when the agency removed her

from the position of Special Investigative Supervisor (SIS) in September

1995 in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title

VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

Previously, we affirmed the decision of an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ)

who concluded that complainant established that she was discriminated

against as referenced above. The agency now requests reconsideration

alleging an erroneous interpretation of material fact. After a review

of the agency's request for reconsideration, the previous decision,

and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to

meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b) and it is the decision of

the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No.

01991871 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further

right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this

request for reconsideration.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following remedial action:

1. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall offer complainant the position of Special

Investigative Supervisor or a substantially equivalent position.

Complainant shall be given a minimum of fifteen days from receipt of the

offer within which to accept or decline the offer. Failure to accept

the offer within the time period set by the agency will be considered a

rejection of the offer, unless complainant can show that circumstances

beyond her control prevented a response within the time limit.

2. Within sixty (60) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, the agency is directed to award complainant back pay,

with interest, for all wages and benefits lost between the date she

was removed from the position of Special Investigative Supervisor in

September 1995 and the date complainant accepts or declines the offer.

The agency shall determine the appropriate amount of back pay, interest,

and other benefits due complainant, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(c).

The complainant shall cooperate in the agency's efforts to compute

the amount of back pay and benefits due, and shall provide all relevant

information requested by the agency. If there is a dispute regarding the

exact amount of back pay and/or benefits, the agency shall issue a check

to the complainant for the undisputed amount within sixty (60) calendar

days of the date the agency determines the amount it believes to be due.

The complainant may petition for enforcement or clarification of the

amount in dispute. The petition for clarification or enforcement must

be filed with the Compliance Officer, at the address referenced in the

statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision."

3. The issues of compensatory damages and attorney's fees and costs

are remanded to the Hearings Unit of the San Francisco District Office.

Thereafter, the Administrative Judge shall issue a decision on these

issues in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109, and the agency shall

issue a final action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.110 within forty

(40) days of receipt of the Administrative Judge's decision. The agency

shall submit copies of

the Administrative Judge's decision and the final agency action to the

Compliance Officer at the address set forth below.

4. The agency shall provide training to all the management officials

responsible for this matter in their duties and obligations under the

statutes enforced by this Commission.

5. The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include supporting documentation of the

agency's calculation of back pay and other

benefits due complainant, and the agency's decision regarding

compensatory damages, including evidence that the corrective action

has been implemented.

POSTING ORDER (G1092)

The agency is ORDERED to post at its San Francisco, California facility

copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after being

signed by the agency's duly authorized representative, shall be posted

by the agency within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, and shall remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days,

in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are

customarily posted. The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that

said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.

The original signed notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer

at the address cited in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the

Commission's Decision," within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration

of the posting period.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 27, 2001

Date

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

An Agency of the United States Government

Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission dated ___________ which found that

a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq., has occurred at this facility.

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination or retaliation

against any employee or applicant for employment because of that person's

RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, PRIOR EEO ACTIVITYor

PHYSICAL or MENTAL DISABILITY with respect to hiring, firing, promotion,

compensation, or other terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.

The Federal Correctional Institution in Dublin, California, (hereinafter

referred to as �facility�) supports and will comply with such Federal

law and will not take action against individuals because they have

exercised their rights under law.

The facility has been found to have retaliated against an employee by

taking reprisal against her for engaging in protected EEO activity.

The facility has been ordered to give the supervisors involved training

regarding the requirements of the law referred to in this posting and to

ensure that officials responsible for personnel decisions and terms and

conditions of employment will abide by the requirements of all Federal

equal employment laws.

The facility will not in any manner restrain, interfere, coerce,

or retaliate against any individual who exercises his or her

right to oppose practices made unlawful by, or who participates in

proceedings pursuant to, Federal equal employment opportunity law.

_________________________

Date Posted: ____________________

Posting Expires: _________________

29 C.F.R. Part 1614