Sharon Cross, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 26, 2009
0120070772 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 26, 2009)

0120070772

02-26-2009

Sharon Cross, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Sharon Cross,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120070772

Agency No. 4B030001806

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's October 20, 2006 final decision concerning

her equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Complainant alleged that the agency

discriminated against her on the bases of sex (female), disability

(unspecified), age (aged 56), and in reprisal for prior protected EEO

activity when, on March 14, 2006, her request for reassignment to the

Nashua, New Hampshire Logistics and Distribution Center was denied.

To establish her claim of unlawful discrimination, complainant

must satisfy the three-part evidentiary scheme fashioned by the

Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792

(1973). Complainant must initially establish a prima facie case by

demonstrating that she was subjected to an adverse employment action

under circumstances that would support an inference of discrimination.

Furnco Construction Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 576 (1978). Proof of a

prima facie case will vary depending on the facts of the particular case.

McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804 n. 14. The burden then shifts to

the agency to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for

its actions. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450

U.S. 248, 253 (1981). To ultimately prevail, complainant must prove,

by a preponderance of the evidence, that the agency's explanation is

pretextual. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133,

134 (2000); St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 519 (1993).

After a review of the record in its entirety, it is the decision of the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final

decision because the preponderance of the evidence of record does not

establish that discrimination occurred. We note that complainant failed

to submit information to support her complaint including, but not limited

to, the nature of her claimed disability; neither did she establish

that agency officials were aware of her claimed disability; nor that she

had ever requested reasonable accommodation for her claimed disability.

Further, the agency articulated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason

for denying the requested reassignment; namely, that complainant had

a poor attendance record. Complainant failed to present any evidence

to support a finding that the agency's explanation was more likely a

pretext for discrimination. For the foregoing reasons, the agency's

decision is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 26, 2009

Date

2

0120070772

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120070772